|
1=0
May 4, 2022 23:07:05 GMT
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 4, 2022 23:07:05 GMT
1. Nothingness is sameness and sameness is 1. 1 and 0 equate.
2. Being at its core is without definition as the totality of being is without comparison. The no-thingness of being is the totality of being. 1 and 0 equate again as the totality is 1 and this 1 is no thing thus 0.
|
|
|
1=0
May 6, 2022 5:06:45 GMT
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 6, 2022 5:06:45 GMT
If 1=0, then none of your words are true, since your claim works for both sides of contradiction. So, 1=0 doesn't make any sense: to say 1=0 is the same as to say "it is true that 1=0, but there is no true".
|
|
|
1=0
May 11, 2022 23:06:04 GMT
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 11, 2022 23:06:04 GMT
If 1=0, then none of your words are true, since your claim works for both sides of contradiction. So, 1=0 doesn't make any sense: to say 1=0 is the same as to say "it is true that 1=0, but there is no true". If my claim works for both sides of the contradiction then my words are both true and false; as true and false there is an element of truth in these words. Truths and falsity are one; it is true that there are certain falsities which exist, it is false that there are certain truths that exist.
|
|
|
1=0
May 12, 2022 5:14:08 GMT
via mobile
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 12, 2022 5:14:08 GMT
If 1=0, then none of your words are true, since your claim works for both sides of contradiction. So, 1=0 doesn't make any sense: to say 1=0 is the same as to say "it is true that 1=0, but there is no true". If my claim works for both sides of the contradiction then my words are both true and false; as true and false there is an element of truth in these words. Truths and falsity are one; it is true that there are certain falsities which exist, it is false that there are certain truths that exist. So, as your words have both they have got elements of falsely, therefore truth and false might not be one. No, it isn't you who makes mistakes, you may be right. By the way, it is possible that 1=0. I think there are some connections in the world, thus: A. If 1=1, 0=0, then 2=2, 3=3, ..., n=n. B. If 1=0, then 2=1, 3=2, ..., n=n–1. So, that was my thought. I expressed it in a not good manner.
|
|
|
1=0
May 12, 2022 17:16:04 GMT
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 12, 2022 17:16:04 GMT
If my claim works for both sides of the contradiction then my words are both true and false; as true and false there is an element of truth in these words. Truths and falsity are one; it is true that there are certain falsities which exist, it is false that there are certain truths that exist. So, as your words have both they have got elements of falsely, therefore truth and false might not be one. No, it isn't you who makes mistakes, you may be right. By the way, it is possible that 1=0. I think there are some connections in the world, thus: A. If 1=1, 0=0, then 2=2, 3=3, ..., n=n. B. If 1=0, then 2=1, 3=2, ..., n=n–1. So, that was my thought. I expressed it in a not good manner. All phenomenon are subject to context; under one context the phenomenon is true under another it is false. In comparing the phenomenon to both contexts the phenomenon is both true and false simultaneously.
|
|