Post by Eugene 2.0 on Apr 2, 2022 18:08:38 GMT
This example can be taken to illustrate the idea of why there are no analysis, but only a synthesis.
Let's have a look at the sentence:
It's raining at the moment
To analyze this sentence syntactically we can do the next:
- find a subject;
- find an object;
- find other grammatical categories
In this sentence the subject is: It
the object is: __
the action: (is) raining
the when: at the moment
It can be done by other principle like that:
- find nouns;
- find pronouns;
- find verbs;
- find adjectives;
- find adverbs;
- find prepositions.
In this sentence: the pronoun is: it
the verbs are: is, raining
the preposition is: at (the)
the noun is: moment
What we have been doing by all this? An analysis? No, the synthesis.
Now, it's time to explain the steps more precisely:
a) we've got a sentence
b) we've got the rules of how to analyze it with syntax
c) we've got the rules of how to analyze it with grammar
1) we took the sentence
2) found a word that corresponds to a word that has the parametres of a subject
3) there was a word that corresponds by its parametres as a subject, and that word was it
4) found a word that corresponds to a word that has the parametres of an object
5) there was a word that corresponds by its parametres as an object, and that word was __
6) (we skip some steps, because they almost repeat the previous)
...
n) found a word that corresponds to a word that has the parametres of a pronoun
n+1) there was a word that matched by its parametres to the pronoun, and that word was it
n+2) (we can skip here too)
These lines are also rough, because if we got more deeper, we would find a corresponding of letters or lines (geometrically) as the machines do.
But each machine does it my instructions as such:
P1) process a symbol from (1;1)
P2) write the result into (x1;y1)
P3) take a symbol from the tablet 1
P4) write the result into (x2;y1)
P5) if x1 is bigger, than x2, then do P6), else do Pn)
Each step for a machine looks like this:
abc xyz 000
xbc ayz 121
xyc abz 222
xyz abc 323
In other words, we've got some data and the instructions, and we add the data or mix it to/with the instructions, and get the result. But this is not an analysis, it is a synthesis. As I said previosly, this example can be taken to illustrate that there are no analysis, but synthesis.
Let's have a look at the sentence:
It's raining at the moment
To analyze this sentence syntactically we can do the next:
- find a subject;
- find an object;
- find other grammatical categories
In this sentence the subject is: It
the object is: __
the action: (is) raining
the when: at the moment
It can be done by other principle like that:
- find nouns;
- find pronouns;
- find verbs;
- find adjectives;
- find adverbs;
- find prepositions.
In this sentence: the pronoun is: it
the verbs are: is, raining
the preposition is: at (the)
the noun is: moment
What we have been doing by all this? An analysis? No, the synthesis.
Now, it's time to explain the steps more precisely:
a) we've got a sentence
b) we've got the rules of how to analyze it with syntax
c) we've got the rules of how to analyze it with grammar
1) we took the sentence
2) found a word that corresponds to a word that has the parametres of a subject
3) there was a word that corresponds by its parametres as a subject, and that word was it
4) found a word that corresponds to a word that has the parametres of an object
5) there was a word that corresponds by its parametres as an object, and that word was __
6) (we skip some steps, because they almost repeat the previous)
...
n) found a word that corresponds to a word that has the parametres of a pronoun
n+1) there was a word that matched by its parametres to the pronoun, and that word was it
n+2) (we can skip here too)
These lines are also rough, because if we got more deeper, we would find a corresponding of letters or lines (geometrically) as the machines do.
But each machine does it my instructions as such:
P1) process a symbol from (1;1)
P2) write the result into (x1;y1)
P3) take a symbol from the tablet 1
P4) write the result into (x2;y1)
P5) if x1 is bigger, than x2, then do P6), else do Pn)
Each step for a machine looks like this:
abc xyz 000
xbc ayz 121
xyc abz 222
xyz abc 323
In other words, we've got some data and the instructions, and we add the data or mix it to/with the instructions, and get the result. But this is not an analysis, it is a synthesis. As I said previosly, this example can be taken to illustrate that there are no analysis, but synthesis.
