|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 30, 2022 22:38:53 GMT
1. There are x number of phenomena.
2. Amidst these phenomena are similarities.
3. These similarities connect x number of phenomena as one thing, the similarity, repeats itself.
4. This repetition of said phenomenon, within the phenomena, allows for the equivocation of phenomena.
5. This equivocation is one phenomenon within multiple states; repetition is oneness.
6. This oneness reflects itself across the different contexts of the x number of phenomena themselves thus is definite because of the various contrasts.
7. However without these various phenomena, which the similar phenomenon exist within, there is no contrast thus the similarity is indefinite.
8. A paradox ensues from this considering the similar phenomenon that exists across x becomes indefinite if the number of phenomena it exists through is indefinite; the x number of phenomena is indefinite given one phenomenon must continuously exist through another if the underlying quality of being is to be maintained.
9. The oneness of a phenomenon, within phenomena, is thus void of characteristics allowing x phenomena to have nothing between them; nothing between phenomenon is the sameness of a phenomenon existing across multiple phenomena.
|
|