Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 25, 2022 15:41:46 GMT
xxxxxxxxx was right saying that absolute nothing is sameness. I've got another type of proof of it.
Imagine that anything doesn't change at all. To be completely certain about that we would have to have some registration of it whether or not anything changed. Since we don't have anything like that - because everything is frozen - then cannot say or do anything. All what is possible - is nothing.
But what about the sameness? How this thing is related here, you may ask? The point is that if anything doesn't change then everything is the same, or this sameness is all what is presented. So, we may generalize it saying that asbolute nothing = sameness.
The same is about any spacial things. If all the things/elements/atoms/whichever would be the same, then among those elements therer would be no way to get anything. I mean if everything is the same (each element, atom, etc), then there's no way to say what exists, or what does not exist, or whatever.
So, if everything is the same, or the sameness is everywhere, then each of those elements (of course if there are any; because we don't even know about this either) is impossible to be viewed or understood. All what we can say about such the sameness is that it does not change, and if it doesn't, then it automatically gets to the previous proof.
Imagine that anything doesn't change at all. To be completely certain about that we would have to have some registration of it whether or not anything changed. Since we don't have anything like that - because everything is frozen - then cannot say or do anything. All what is possible - is nothing.
But what about the sameness? How this thing is related here, you may ask? The point is that if anything doesn't change then everything is the same, or this sameness is all what is presented. So, we may generalize it saying that asbolute nothing = sameness.
The same is about any spacial things. If all the things/elements/atoms/whichever would be the same, then among those elements therer would be no way to get anything. I mean if everything is the same (each element, atom, etc), then there's no way to say what exists, or what does not exist, or whatever.
So, if everything is the same, or the sameness is everywhere, then each of those elements (of course if there are any; because we don't even know about this either) is impossible to be viewed or understood. All what we can say about such the sameness is that it does not change, and if it doesn't, then it automatically gets to the previous proof.