Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 24, 2022 21:59:14 GMT
1. Infinite fullness and infinite emptiness both share the same quality of being indefinite thus one indefinite state is equal to another.
2. Being, ie fullness, and non-being, ie emptiness, thus both equate.
3. What negates this equivocation is if being/fullness and non-being/emptiness are both finite, however each as finite causes both again to equate under the quality of "finiteness".
4. Infinity and finiteness both differ however but this difference dissolves as infinity/finiteness both equivocate respectively through being/non-being ("being" is both infinite/finite and "non-being" is both infinite/finite).
5. What negates this equivocation is if being is infinite and non-being is finite or vice versa; however this results in obscurity as well given infinite "x" and finite "y" require infinite "x" existing through a continuity of finite "y" and the finite "y" existing through the non-continuity of the singular infinite "x".
6. One quality existing through the other necessitates equivocation and this equivocation results in sameness therefore P=-P.
2. Being, ie fullness, and non-being, ie emptiness, thus both equate.
3. What negates this equivocation is if being/fullness and non-being/emptiness are both finite, however each as finite causes both again to equate under the quality of "finiteness".
4. Infinity and finiteness both differ however but this difference dissolves as infinity/finiteness both equivocate respectively through being/non-being ("being" is both infinite/finite and "non-being" is both infinite/finite).
5. What negates this equivocation is if being is infinite and non-being is finite or vice versa; however this results in obscurity as well given infinite "x" and finite "y" require infinite "x" existing through a continuity of finite "y" and the finite "y" existing through the non-continuity of the singular infinite "x".
6. One quality existing through the other necessitates equivocation and this equivocation results in sameness therefore P=-P.
