|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 14, 2022 22:35:49 GMT
There is no full transcendence if one cannot transcend above the phenomenon of transcendence; dually if one transcends above the phenomenon of transcendence there is no transcendence. Transcendence is relative and as relative is nothing in its totality.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 17, 2022 4:48:09 GMT
Yeah, the transcendence is only imaginary. Even the transcendental numbers are written down using non-transcendental numbers.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 31, 2022 22:49:11 GMT
Yeah, the transcendence is only imaginary. Even the transcendental numbers are written down using non-transcendental numbers. If it is within the nature of one to transcend, and they transcend in some relative point, then they did not transcend above their nature to transcend. However if they do transcend above their nature to transcend then they do not transcend at all as transcendence negates itself. Either way there is no complete non-relative transcendence unless one observes each facet of being as being an absolute given it is part of the whole of being which is absolute.
|
|