|
Post by jonbain on Oct 5, 2019 16:20:59 GMT
If you have not read Dostoevsky, you may not fully appreciate the gravity of this idea; but you do not have to have read him to appreciate the concept.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Oct 5, 2019 19:46:58 GMT
No, true ruthlessness is ruthless even to itself thus is completely objective as it negates the desire for even the pleasure of destruction as something irrational, unnecessary and sick.
Maliciousness eventually cancels itself out into objective compassion if taken to far enough of an extreme...or one could say that maliciousness is weak ruthlessness.
|
|