The Impossibility of Randomness

The simpler version is this:

1. All axioms are self-evident truths ranging from a simple thought to the empirical sensation of drinking orange juice to the feeling of disgust when seeing injustice. An axiom strictly is an observation, both subjective and objective in nature. Subjective in the respect of the observer's angle, objective in the respect there is clear cut definition to the phenomenon.

1a) A synonymous interpretation to "axiom" may be "phenomenon", "a reality", "an experience", "observation" etc. However these are all "axioms" as all words/symbols/definitions are variation of the "one axiom": ie "I AM" in Abrahamic faiths/philosophies of "The All" in Eastern Faiths/philosophies.

2. All axioms, using point 1a as an example in just describing the axiom alone, observes all axioms exist through a form of variation. One axiom progresses to another axiom so on and so forth. This progression of one axiom to another is universal. It can be observed in the linear movement of a rock through time resulting in the change of the rock, a simple equation where one value is directed towards another, or even the writing and reading of this sentence itself under the manifestation of a continual progressive variation in letters/words/symbols/etc.

3. All axioms unfold from "void". We can observe this in an almost "vacuum" state where particles "spontaneously" come in and out. It can also be observed with some "spontaneous" feeling about an event that comes from "nowhere". Other examples may be a "thought" coming from nothing or simply staring into space at a single point (either in the mind or physically through the senses) moving towards it and watching reality unfold through a series of variations.

4. Observing Point 3, the particles which come in and out of the vacuum always move in 1 direction, then another 1 direction, etc. as 1 direction in itself (example: a particle may appear at point A move in some series of appearing random curves then disappear at point B, however this particle as moving from Point A to Point B always observes a linear direction from Point A to Point B). The same occurs for other phenomenon such as a driving a car from point A to destination point B. A train of thought or some emotion.

5. All axioms always appear at some defined point of origin, project to another point of origin, and dissappear.

6. This variation of not just axioms but the movements between the axioms gives an impression of randomness, primarily because of the variation itself gives weight to such a high degree of relations or movements that a full definition of "order" appears impossible. The problem occurs that this variation is a repetition of 1 variable through itself as itself: linear movement. Because all phenomenon are grounded in linear movement, what we understand of randomness is strictly an approximation of one constant boundary of symmetry manifesting itself

7. The line itself, sets not just a foundation for all axioms as existing in a state of directed movement (with this directed movement existing as the boundaries for further directed movements; ie the movement on one particle is composed of further particles) but that all phenomenon exist as a means of definition where the nature of "reality unfolding" is strictly definition.

One phenomenon seperates from another; another set of phenomenon are connected. The line exists as a process of definition, akin to "intelligence" in both the practical and intuitive sense of "connect/seperating the dots" relative to problem solving or the act of creating art, and in itself is everpresent if not omnipresent; thus observing all phenomenon as rooted in a Divine Mind.

8. Because all phenomena are premised in linear space, with linear space self-referencing itself through variations of axioms as linear space itself, randomness is impossible as linear space is the foundational order through which all phenomenon exist. Even a simple curve still observes a linear projection from Point A to Point B while the curve (as evidenced by an close up observation of natural phenomenon, such a rock or leave, as inherently "jagged") is composed of multiple lines projecting to further lines as angles. So even curvature is both linear in projection from point A to Point B while being composed of or composing further linear space.

9. Even this forum is about connecting and seperating the axioms, or points of awareness, to give a clear cut definition over certain facets of the culture.

10. Order is inevitable, randomness is just an approximation of a unified reality through various forms. Randomness, however as an approximation, is still a clear cut definition of order by observing "seperation" as a law. Thus Randomness is conducive to disunity, however this disunity is still premised upon a uniform law of linear seperation.

well, i determined axiom according to a literal statement,not a hypothetical particle.its not lost on me,though,that your inability to determine the defining measures justifies the term random.spontaneous apparently,as no cause measured prior to the activity.......no one can argue either way.my sincerest apologies.my axiom,now having a red face and anxious disposition,would have been(loosens collar)"kinda hot in here..."