|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 4, 2019 7:57:51 GMT
I think that the central and the most important thing in our whole life is our family. The family is a male father, a female mother, and their children. And the importance of this structure is what we mainly need to protect.
This concept of family is constantly being attacked by the groups of leftism vision of the world. And it's necessary that this concept is needed to be protected, but how? A protection with using force is good, but it's rather a decision of a barbarian, not a civilized way. However, if a person would be about to be killed, he'd rather do his best to protect oneself. So, force methods seem to be relevant in the situation, 'cause to lost the concept of family is something like to lost your own image, or the image of how to be normal.
Also, striking on the family by antiChristians. A white male Christian is now under attack too. And the word "Christian" is important here. So, maybe a ruining of the family is a move of destruction of Christianity.
What do you think about the family I described in first paragraph? How to protect the concept of the family? And what is needed of protection most: the family, or Christianity?
|
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Feb 4, 2019 14:28:30 GMT
That is the only family structure that we've always had. Why? Because it's the only family structure that can bring a real biological family. Men don't give birth and women don't have sperm. Men are XY and women are XX. The sooner transgenders and other weirdos return to normal life the faster families will be preserved. Otherwise, they're killing off families and taking kids away from a standard mom/dad family and raising kids who don't know how the world works. Such people are a shame to humanity.
Why is a white male Christian under attacked? I didn't know about this.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 4, 2019 16:45:57 GMT
That is the only family structure that we've always had. Why? Because it's the only family structure that can bring a real biological family. Men don't give birth and women don't have sperm. Men are XY and women are XX. The sooner transgenders and other weirdos return to normal life the faster families will be preserved. Otherwise, they're killing off families and taking kids away from a standard mom/dad family and raising kids who don't know how the world works. Such people are a shame to humanity. Why is a white male Christian under attacked? I didn't know about this. Here's one of the video, but I'm not sure it will be suited well: I apologize that this video isn't so representative as I expected. Actually, the info is commonly shared. Paul Watson, Jordan Peterson, Lauren Southern, Daisy Cousens and many others talk about it in their vlogs time to time. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Feb 4, 2019 17:42:07 GMT
I think that the central and the most important thing in our whole life is our family. The family is a male father, a female mother, and their children. And the importance of this structure is what we mainly need to protect. This concept of family is constantly being attacked by the groups of leftism vision of the world. And it's necessary that this concept is needed to be protected, but how? A protection with using force is good, but it's rather a decision of a barbarian, not a civilized way. However, if a person would be about to be killed, he'd rather do his best to protect oneself. So, force methods seem to be relevant in the situation, 'cause to lost the concept of family is something like to lost your own image, or the image of how to be normal. Also, striking on the family by antiChristians. A white male Christian is now under attack too. And the word "Christian" is important here. So, maybe a ruining of the family is a move of destruction of Christianity. What do you think about the family I described in first paragraph? How to protect the concept of the family? And what is needed of protection most: the family, or Christianity? All problems are root in an ideology. The idea is the form we mold materiality too.
How to Deal with Philosophy, Science, Religion.
Kill the ideology of the Left with the Munchausseen Trillima. Kill the Right too, for they are just tomorrow's left. Kill capitalism. Kill Communism. Kill Nazism. Kill the Nihilism which fathered them all.
War, restructuring society, etc.... none of it will do any good if the ideologies which give form to these phenomenon are still ingrained within the structure of man. Philosophy must die. Religion must die. Modern Reason must die. What we understand of "family" from weak father figures who could not guide there wives with any sense of compassion or respect, and the "whores" of mother we have who go threw life trying to fill themselves with whatever "newness" unfoldinging from the will...all must die. It's all polluted. Let it all die.
Kill the ideology and you kill the problem...because that is all an idea is: a little cookie cutter knife that fragments reality into cute little shapes...that mean nothing except some deluded cathartic stagnation.
Most leftist ideology is strictly an extension of unbounded self-defeating science, where a continual atomism occurs and gives an illusion of knowledge through the perpetual division of facts. We create a tool to make make things more efficient, to "control" time, that is...considering all phenomena that are material effectively are just one thing: "time".
In dividing time we divide the inherent identity of the self interwoven into it. There is no "rest" because there is no ability to lose oneself to a continuum. There is no work...because there is no real continuum. And why is there no continuum, because continuuity is a subjective experience set within the hearts and minds of man.
What there is is a dark fog of philosophies, theologies, fun little factoids and viagra commercials showing how sterile we really are in obtaining any sense of creative meaning. Noone thinks. Noone works. Noone even really fucks.
We divided one activity into another, one concept into another...hell we make tools just to make tools... all in a simple attempt to do one thing:
Create a singularity where we are everything and everywhere in one moment. The problem occurs is that 1=0 and the singularity, the "whole", was already observed by the ancients...cutting up reality into interesting little...well "whatever's" because even language is turning into a homogenous mass of emojis, is just a perpetual movement to point zero.
It is an institutionalized death drive. Hell I can just walk down the street and all the "signs" (no trespassing, stop, etc.) just scream "stay away" from unknown master's who perfected some little masturbatory craft of creating there own little universe...there own little "ego's" where they control something.
What we control, noone really knows because it is just a process of "imagining" stuff...which is really fitting since the most powerful industry is the entertainment industry.
The problem is the in being "everywhere", in watching all the forms fold into further forms...everything is just a burning fire, a chaos of perpetual folding dramas where everyone is trying to "heroically" create some sense of the "I"...just so they can fit in and avoid being an outcast. Heroism is the new cowardice.
This applies to the nature of human relations as well, the psyche so to speak, where what constitutes any natural identity is effectively broken apart and rearranged. The problem is that in rearranging one requires "nature" so the fabric of reality, given time, will revert to its natural structure. We use circular reasoning to avoid circular reasoning, not realizing it is just an attempt to control not just our own judgements but how we will be judged.
And that is the problem...judgement. Seperating the wheat from the chaff, never really realizing the wheat existed all along because of the chaff. And that is the problem, which is a problem of a problem of a problem of a problem...blah, blah, blah.
The greatest problem is the problem.
The problem with philosopher's today is that they really are without any sense of depth. They want to fit in with the scientists, the theologians...etc. They want to be "loved" and "admired" by the masses by producing some little clever...whatever. And it is reduced to producing a "whatever" considering the sole mantra of the generations they are trying to impress is "whatever".
They want to produce something, but all there kids are what the other kids beat up. They think if they cloth themselves in the fancy conceptualization of the romans somehow they will carry out the maxim "when in Rome...". And they all think this and where they don't it pops up as a wet dream.
What the philosopher's fail to realize is that Rome was built in a day, it was built when the smaller man realized all he had to do what stab the "stronger barbarian" in the throat with
And that is history. There was no glorious battle, just men castrating and cutting the throats of other men. Then someone came along and said "Well...this seems to work...let's build off these foundations."
Munchhausen Trillema the f'ck out of everything, and when that is villified point out it is only villified because people want to believe it is some other way...when it really isn't.
Let circular reasoning be the crown he places on his the head of his enemy to mock his kingship.
Let the thorns of infinite regress pierce his psyche.
Run the pointed tip of "accepted axioms" through his side into his heart.
Mock the anti-christ, the great nazi intellectualism brought about by Neitzche, the repressive "zeitgeist" we all know we gain our identities from under the current state. It claims "immortality"...let is prove itself.
Let the current priest class see if they can act as the messiah's they claim to be. Crucify them because we all want to seem some rabbit pulled out the hat type of miracle. We want to see the rabbit pulled out the hat because we want to see how deep the rabbit hole goes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 4, 2019 18:04:06 GMT
I think that the central and the most important thing in our whole life is our family. The family is a male father, a female mother, and their children. And the importance of this structure is what we mainly need to protect. This concept of family is constantly being attacked by the groups of leftism vision of the world. And it's necessary that this concept is needed to be protected, but how? A protection with using force is good, but it's rather a decision of a barbarian, not a civilized way. However, if a person would be about to be killed, he'd rather do his best to protect oneself. So, force methods seem to be relevant in the situation, 'cause to lost the concept of family is something like to lost your own image, or the image of how to be normal. Also, striking on the family by antiChristians. A white male Christian is now under attack too. And the word "Christian" is important here. So, maybe a ruining of the family is a move of destruction of Christianity. What do you think about the family I described in first paragraph? How to protect the concept of the family? And what is needed of protection most: the family, or Christianity? All problems are root in an ideology. The idea is the form we mold materiality too.
How to Deal with Philosophy, Science, Religion.
Kill the ideology of the Left with the Munchausseen Trillima. Kill the Right too, for they are just tomorrow's left. Kill capitalism. Kill Communism. Kill Nazism. Kill the Nihilism which fathered them all.
War, restructuring society, etc.... none of it will do any good if the ideologies which give form to these phenomenon are still ingrained within the structure of man. Philosophy must die. Religion must die. Modern Reason must die. What we understand of "family" from weak father figures who could not guide there wives with any sense of compassion or respect, and the "whores" of mother we have who go threw life trying to fill themselves with whatever "newness" unfoldinging from the will...all must die. It's all polluted. Let it all die.
Kill the ideology and you kill the problem...because that is all an idea is: a little cookie cutter knife that fragments reality into cute little shapes...that mean nothing except some deluded cathartic stagnation.
Most leftist ideology is strictly an extension of unbounded self-defeating science, where a continual atomism occurs and gives an illusion of knowledge through the perpetual division of facts. We create a tool to make make things more efficient, to "control" time, that is...considering all phenomena that are material effectively are just one thing: "time".
In dividing time we divide the inherent identity of the self interwoven into it. There is no "rest" because there is no ability to lose oneself to a continuum. There is no work...because there is no real continuum. And why is there no continuum, because continuuity is a subjective experience set within the hearts and minds of man.
What there is is a dark fog of philosophies, theologies, fun little factoids and viagra commercials showing how sterile we really are in obtaining any sense of creative meaning. Noone thinks. Noone works. Noone even really fucks.
We divided one activity into another, one concept into another...hell we make tools just to make tools... all in a simple attempt to do one thing:
Create a singularity where we are everything and everywhere in one moment. The problem occurs is that 1=0 and the singularity, the "whole", was already observed by the ancients...cutting up reality into interesting little...well "whatever's" because even language is turning into a homogenous mass of emojis, is just a perpetual movement to point zero.
It is an institutionalized death drive. Hell I can just walk down the street and all the "signs" (no trespassing, stop, etc.) just scream "stay away" from unknown master's who perfected some little masturbatory craft of creating there own little universe...there own little "ego's" where they control something.
What we control, noone really knows because it is just a process of "imagining" stuff...which is really fitting since the most powerful industry is the entertainment industry.
The problem is the in being "everywhere", in watching all the forms fold into further forms...everything is just a burning fire, a chaos of perpetual folding dramas where everyone is trying to "heroically" create some sense of the "I"...just so they can fit in and avoid being an outcast. Heroism is the new cowardice.
This applies to the nature of human relations as well, the psyche so to speak, where what constitutes any natural identity is effectively broken apart and rearranged. The problem is that in rearranging one requires "nature" so the fabric of reality, given time, will revert to its natural structure. We use circular reasoning to avoid circular reasoning, not realizing it is just an attempt to control not just our own judgements but how we will be judged.
And that is the problem...judgement. Seperating the wheat from the chaff, never really realizing the wheat existed all along because of the chaff. And that is the problem, which is a problem of a problem of a problem of a problem...blah, blah, blah.
The greatest problem is the problem.
The problem with philosopher's today is that they really are without any sense of depth. They want to fit in with the scientists, the theologians...etc. They want to be "loved" and "admired" by the masses by producing some little clever...whatever. And it is reduced to producing a "whatever" considering the sole mantra of the generations they are trying to impress is "whatever".
They want to produce something, but all there kids are what the other kids beat up. They think if they cloth themselves in the fancy conceptualization of the romans somehow they will carry out the maxim "when in Rome...". And they all think this and where they don't it pops up as a wet dream.
What the philosopher's fail to realize is that Rome was built in a day, it was built when the smaller man realized all he had to do what stab the "stronger barbarian" in the throat with
And that is history. There was no glorious battle, just men castrating and cutting the throats of other men. Then someone came along and said "Well...this seems to work...let's build off these foundations."
Munchhausen Trillema the f'ck out of everything, and when that is villified point out it is only villified because people want to believe it is some other way...when it really isn't.
Let circular reasoning be the crown he places on his the head of his enemy to mock his kingship.
Let the thorns of infinite regress pierce his psyche.
Run the pointed tip of "accepted axioms" through his side into his heart.
Mock the anti-christ, the great nazi intellectualism brought about by Neitzche, the repressive "zeitgeist" we all know we gain our identities from under the current state. It claims "immortality"...let is prove itself.
Let the current priest class see if they can act as the messiah's they claim to be. Crucify them because we all want to seem some rabbit pulled out the hat type of miracle. We want to see the rabbit pulled out the hat because we want to see how deep the rabbit hole goes.
I beg your pardon, but can't you be more politely with your expressions? You're a very talented, and since that you're able to show the greatest potential of the culture. This situation is the most dramatic, I think: the really talented man, instead of show the maximum of the cultural good abilities, shows his rather animal nature... It hurts... really hurts. You remembered the name of Nietzsche, but it would be better to use the other poets, normal ones. What do you think about Pushkin? Have you read his poems? |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Feb 4, 2019 18:10:24 GMT
All problems are root in an ideology. The idea is the form we mold materiality too.
How to Deal with Philosophy, Science, Religion.
Kill the ideology of the Left with the Munchausseen Trillima. Kill the Right too, for they are just tomorrow's left. Kill capitalism. Kill Communism. Kill Nazism. Kill the Nihilism which fathered them all.
War, restructuring society, etc.... none of it will do any good if the ideologies which give form to these phenomenon are still ingrained within the structure of man. Philosophy must die. Religion must die. Modern Reason must die. What we understand of "family" from weak father figures who could not guide there wives with any sense of compassion or respect, and the "whores" of mother we have who go threw life trying to fill themselves with whatever "newness" unfoldinging from the will...all must die. It's all polluted. Let it all die.
Kill the ideology and you kill the problem...because that is all an idea is: a little cookie cutter knife that fragments reality into cute little shapes...that mean nothing except some deluded cathartic stagnation.
Most leftist ideology is strictly an extension of unbounded self-defeating science, where a continual atomism occurs and gives an illusion of knowledge through the perpetual division of facts. We create a tool to make make things more efficient, to "control" time, that is...considering all phenomena that are material effectively are just one thing: "time".
In dividing time we divide the inherent identity of the self interwoven into it. There is no "rest" because there is no ability to lose oneself to a continuum. There is no work...because there is no real continuum. And why is there no continuum, because continuuity is a subjective experience set within the hearts and minds of man.
What there is is a dark fog of philosophies, theologies, fun little factoids and viagra commercials showing how sterile we really are in obtaining any sense of creative meaning. Noone thinks. Noone works. Noone even really fucks.
We divided one activity into another, one concept into another...hell we make tools just to make tools... all in a simple attempt to do one thing:
Create a singularity where we are everything and everywhere in one moment. The problem occurs is that 1=0 and the singularity, the "whole", was already observed by the ancients...cutting up reality into interesting little...well "whatever's" because even language is turning into a homogenous mass of emojis, is just a perpetual movement to point zero.
It is an institutionalized death drive. Hell I can just walk down the street and all the "signs" (no trespassing, stop, etc.) just scream "stay away" from unknown master's who perfected some little masturbatory craft of creating there own little universe...there own little "ego's" where they control something.
What we control, noone really knows because it is just a process of "imagining" stuff...which is really fitting since the most powerful industry is the entertainment industry.
The problem is the in being "everywhere", in watching all the forms fold into further forms...everything is just a burning fire, a chaos of perpetual folding dramas where everyone is trying to "heroically" create some sense of the "I"...just so they can fit in and avoid being an outcast. Heroism is the new cowardice.
This applies to the nature of human relations as well, the psyche so to speak, where what constitutes any natural identity is effectively broken apart and rearranged. The problem is that in rearranging one requires "nature" so the fabric of reality, given time, will revert to its natural structure. We use circular reasoning to avoid circular reasoning, not realizing it is just an attempt to control not just our own judgements but how we will be judged.
And that is the problem...judgement. Seperating the wheat from the chaff, never really realizing the wheat existed all along because of the chaff. And that is the problem, which is a problem of a problem of a problem of a problem...blah, blah, blah.
The greatest problem is the problem.
The problem with philosopher's today is that they really are without any sense of depth. They want to fit in with the scientists, the theologians...etc. They want to be "loved" and "admired" by the masses by producing some little clever...whatever. And it is reduced to producing a "whatever" considering the sole mantra of the generations they are trying to impress is "whatever".
They want to produce something, but all there kids are what the other kids beat up. They think if they cloth themselves in the fancy conceptualization of the romans somehow they will carry out the maxim "when in Rome...". And they all think this and where they don't it pops up as a wet dream.
What the philosopher's fail to realize is that Rome was built in a day, it was built when the smaller man realized all he had to do what stab the "stronger barbarian" in the throat with
And that is history. There was no glorious battle, just men castrating and cutting the throats of other men. Then someone came along and said "Well...this seems to work...let's build off these foundations."
Munchhausen Trillema the f'ck out of everything, and when that is villified point out it is only villified because people want to believe it is some other way...when it really isn't.
Let circular reasoning be the crown he places on his the head of his enemy to mock his kingship.
Let the thorns of infinite regress pierce his psyche.
Run the pointed tip of "accepted axioms" through his side into his heart.
Mock the anti-christ, the great nazi intellectualism brought about by Neitzche, the repressive "zeitgeist" we all know we gain our identities from under the current state. It claims "immortality"...let is prove itself.
Let the current priest class see if they can act as the messiah's they claim to be. Crucify them because we all want to seem some rabbit pulled out the hat type of miracle. We want to see the rabbit pulled out the hat because we want to see how deep the rabbit hole goes.
I beg your pardon, but can't you be more politely with your expressions? You're a very talented, and since that you're able to show the greatest potential of the culture. This situation is the most dramatic, I think: the really talented man, instead of show the maximum of the cultural good abilities, shows his rather animal nature... It hurts... really hurts. You remembered the name of Nietzsche, but it would be better to use the other poets, normal ones. What do you think about Pushkin? Have you read his poems? Barbarianism is the foundation of all cultures. It is the foundation for all "gentlemanly" conduct as a gentleman cannot be a gentleman unless he has the choice to be a barbarian. |
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Feb 4, 2019 23:36:16 GMT
To protect the family, reject modern culture and withdraw from it. This is what the conservative Mennonites have done successfully without using force. This is what I want to promote with Undepraved.org. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 5, 2019 0:00:28 GMT
I beg your pardon, but can't you be more politely with your expressions? You're a very talented, and since that you're able to show the greatest potential of the culture. This situation is the most dramatic, I think: the really talented man, instead of show the maximum of the cultural good abilities, shows his rather animal nature... It hurts... really hurts. You remembered the name of Nietzsche, but it would be better to use the other poets, normal ones. What do you think about Pushkin? Have you read his poems? Barbarianism is the foundation of all cultures. It is the foundation for all "gentlemanly" conduct as a gentleman cannot be a gentleman unless he has the choice to be a barbarian.  It doesn't matter what grounds under any culture, as it doesn't matter on what grounds the beautiful roses have raised. No, no, no... there's no such routes for 'gentlemen'. Gentlemen is a man who can handle a woman. And to handle it - as you said half a year ago - is to be able to control her. I agree on it (but, I don't remember precisely the words, so I apologize if I presented them incorrectly), and, however, I think that the ability of finding something really beautiful is come in handy here. The gentleman is a magnificent gardener for a culture. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Feb 5, 2019 17:42:52 GMT
Barbarianism is the foundation of all cultures. It is the foundation for all "gentlemanly" conduct as a gentleman cannot be a gentleman unless he has the choice to be a barbarian. It doesn't matter what grounds under any culture, as it doesn't matter on what grounds the beautiful roses have raised. No, no, no... there's no such routes for 'gentlemen'. Gentlemen is a man who can handle a woman. And to handle it - as you said half a year ago - is to be able to control her. I agree on it (but, I don't remember precisely the words, so I apologize if I presented them incorrectly), and, however, I think that the ability of finding something really beautiful is come in handy here. The gentleman is a magnificent gardener for a culture. To pick up a rose is to bleed, and cut oneself off from beauty
curving itself by a beautiful loss.
A finger pricked is the first lead, towards a path of futility, concealed by a futile cross.
The blood is but the soul's reed, swaying gently in a hand's winding flurry, a hidden fury, subtle.
A print of the finger but a blossoming beed, the rose a passive impression, Red, a mirror to impress.
A warning of garnet, sown as a seed, the crystalization of two bloods as one a simple gesture left undone.
Oh, the fading of beauty, a quiet need
for a season of winter in the mind of a children, but this sacrifice is the child.
How much more is the rose to bleed, through the hands of intention? Was all of this ever really my intent?
I think this is a good poem, or at least I will tell myself that. It appears my hands are full, debating through poetry, math/logic, standard language, contradiction, facts...who is too know the path of tomorrow?
|
|
PISTON1246
Full Member
Posts: 361 
Likes: 90
Ethnicity: I HAVE ANCESTORS OF DIFFERENT SKIN COLOR AND EYE COLOR AND I MET SOME OF THEM WHILE THEY WERE STILL LIVING
Politics: REGISTERED VOTER
Religion: ISLAM
|
Post by PISTON1246 on Feb 6, 2019 0:20:34 GMT
I WOULD SAY A FELLOW MUSLIM IS GREATER FAMILY THAN A NON MUSLIM OF BLOOD RELATION.
GOING WITH ALLAH'S CAUSE JUST MIGHT REQUIRE THAT YOU LEAVE BEHIND A "FAMILY" MEMBER WHO IS NOT WITH ALLAH.
ALLAH IS THE FIRST PRIORITY FOR MANKIND.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 9, 2019 21:24:12 GMT
It doesn't matter what grounds under any culture, as it doesn't matter on what grounds the beautiful roses have raised. No, no, no... there's no such routes for 'gentlemen'. Gentlemen is a man who can handle a woman. And to handle it - as you said half a year ago - is to be able to control her. I agree on it (but, I don't remember precisely the words, so I apologize if I presented them incorrectly), and, however, I think that the ability of finding something really beautiful is come in handy here. The gentleman is a magnificent gardener for a culture. To pick up a rose is to bleed, and cut oneself off from beauty
curving itself by a beautiful loss.
A finger pricked is the first lead, towards a path of futility, concealed by a futile cross.
The blood is but the soul's reed, swaying gently in a hand's winding flurry, a hidden fury, subtle.
A print of the finger but a blossoming beed, the rose a passive impression, Red, a mirror to impress.
A warning of garnet, sown as a seed, the crystalization of two bloods as one a simple gesture left undone.
Oh, the fading of beauty, a quiet need
for a season of winter in the mind of a children, but this sacrifice is the child.
How much more is the rose to bleed, through the hands of intention? Was all of this ever really my intent?
I think this is a good poem, or at least I will tell myself that. It appears my hands are full, debating through poetry, math/logic, standard language, contradiction, facts...who is too know the path of tomorrow?
A mathematician, a philosopher, a poet, a logician, a thinker, a good man with a heart is... Omar Khayyam?... Yes, this time it is Eod (xxxxxxxxx, and your real name (I remember it, but I decided not to print it here). p.s. Also, the poetry is fulfilled with some imagines and deities like 'mirror', 'wave', 'curving' (I take 'em as objects, because I think it's also possible to do. Often we take things as nouns, and why not to take something as a noun?), etc. And all those things have a strange nature. It's something like a core of a life principle. A curve, or a not straight line (or 'not a line') is a symbol of life (or of something lively, something is alive, etc). A circle - is a symbol of a continually process of life. And your logic (or what is supposed to be like that - I don't know for sure, just guessing) is trying to get to those cores of the 'curving inferences', or kinda. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Feb 9, 2019 21:32:59 GMT
To pick up a rose is to bleed, and cut oneself off from beauty
curving itself by a beautiful loss.
A finger pricked is the first lead, towards a path of futility, concealed by a futile cross.
The blood is but the soul's reed, swaying gently in a hand's winding flurry, a hidden fury, subtle.
A print of the finger but a blossoming beed, the rose a passive impression, Red, a mirror to impress.
A warning of garnet, sown as a seed, the crystalization of two bloods as one a simple gesture left undone.
Oh, the fading of beauty, a quiet need
for a season of winter in the mind of a children, but this sacrifice is the child.
How much more is the rose to bleed, through the hands of intention? Was all of this ever really my intent?
I think this is a good poem, or at least I will tell myself that. It appears my hands are full, debating through poetry, math/logic, standard language, contradiction, facts...who is too know the path of tomorrow?
A mathematician, a philosopher, a poet, a logician, a thinker, a good man with a heart is... Omar Khayyam?... Yes, this time it is Eod (xxxxxxxxx, and your real name (I remember it, but I decided not to print it here). p.s. Also, the poetry is fulfilled with some imagines and deities like 'mirror', 'wave', 'curving' (I take 'em as objects, because I think it's also possible to do. Often we take things as nouns, and why not to take something as a noun?), etc. And all those things have a strange nature. It's something like a core of a life principle. A curve, or a not straight line (or 'not a line') is a symbol of life (or of something lively, something is alive, etc). A circle - is a symbol of a continually process of life. And your logic (or what is supposed to be like that - I don't know for sure, just guessing) is trying to get to those cores of the 'curving inferences', or kinda. Here is another one: A heart moving from thread to threads Searing cracks in the mind, heated by cold deprivation. Weaving Fate's Golden Cord, knotted and entangled, Vortices of one deep intuition giving holes to reason, twisting a sense of the self. Tears run down the face, Streams of broken glass, prisms of lost dreams, cutting softly through a hardened face, hammered by a cloud of time. Empty space, blued by fog of serene thought, an opening of the eye. Gated by atoms of memories, Dissolved through the stirring of time's sharp movements. A flickering hope within the womb of unknowing. Head rested in her lap, she runs her finger's along old scars, light folding through light. Sealed within a veil of the vacuum, oblivious to desire or intent. Waves resonating unpitched sound unravel as a bed, Images of time, flooded in tranquility. Finger's calloused by a burdened mind a caressing her , softening the coarseness of a disturbed sea, hardening and lengthening the vitality of reason. The "I" folds into her, penetrating mysteries, the "I" thrusts deeper and deeper. "Will" released, a neck bejeweled by the tear's of a lover's pain, bending the curvature of space, she arches back. Her lips breath into the psyche, spreading open she receives to birth thought and feeling, all unknowing. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 10, 2019 13:43:19 GMT
A mathematician, a philosopher, a poet, a logician, a thinker, a good man with a heart is... Omar Khayyam?... Yes, this time it is Eod (xxxxxxxxx, and your real name (I remember it, but I decided not to print it here). p.s. Also, the poetry is fulfilled with some imagines and deities like 'mirror', 'wave', 'curving' (I take 'em as objects, because I think it's also possible to do. Often we take things as nouns, and why not to take something as a noun?), etc. And all those things have a strange nature. It's something like a core of a life principle. A curve, or a not straight line (or 'not a line') is a symbol of life (or of something lively, something is alive, etc). A circle - is a symbol of a continually process of life. And your logic (or what is supposed to be like that - I don't know for sure, just guessing) is trying to get to those cores of the 'curving inferences', or kinda. Here is another one: A heart moving from thread to threads Searing cracks in the mind, heated by cold deprivation. Weaving Fate's Golden Cord, knotted and entangled, Vortices of one deep intuition giving holes to reason, twisting a sense of the self. Tears run down the face, Streams of broken glass, prisms of lost dreams, cutting softly through a hardened face, hammered by a cloud of time. Empty space, blued by fog of serene thought, an opening of the eye. Gated by atoms of memories, Dissolved through the stirring of time's sharp movements. A flickering hope within the womb of unknowing. Head rested in her lap, she runs her finger's along old scars, light folding through light. Sealed within a veil of the vacuum, oblivious to desire or intent. Waves resonating unpitched sound unravel as a bed, Images of time, flooded in tranquility. Finger's calloused by a burdened mind a caressing her , softening the coarseness of a disturbed sea, hardening and lengthening the vitality of reason. The "I" folds into her, penetrating mysteries, the "I" thrusts deeper and deeper. "Will" released, a neck bejeweled by the tear's of a lover's pain, bending the curvature of space, she arches back. Her lips breath into the psyche, spreading open she receives to birth thought and feeling, all unknowing. Look, this is gonna be a very intimate question, but... I think I can dare to ask it (if you don't mind): Are you really in love with a someone? |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Feb 11, 2019 17:55:12 GMT
Here is another one: A heart moving from thread to threads Searing cracks in the mind, heated by cold deprivation. Weaving Fate's Golden Cord, knotted and entangled, Vortices of one deep intuition giving holes to reason, twisting a sense of the self. Tears run down the face, Streams of broken glass, prisms of lost dreams, cutting softly through a hardened face, hammered by a cloud of time. Empty space, blued by fog of serene thought, an opening of the eye. Gated by atoms of memories, Dissolved through the stirring of time's sharp movements. A flickering hope within the womb of unknowing. Head rested in her lap, she runs her finger's along old scars, light folding through light. Sealed within a veil of the vacuum, oblivious to desire or intent. Waves resonating unpitched sound unravel as a bed, Images of time, flooded in tranquility. Finger's calloused by a burdened mind a caressing her , softening the coarseness of a disturbed sea, hardening and lengthening the vitality of reason. The "I" folds into her, penetrating mysteries, the "I" thrusts deeper and deeper. "Will" released, a neck bejeweled by the tear's of a lover's pain, bending the curvature of space, she arches back. Her lips breath into the psyche, spreading open she receives to birth thought and feeling, all unknowing. Look, this is gonna be a very intimate question, but... I think I can dare to ask it (if you don't mind): Are you really in love with a someone? Or do I have a really filthy mind and romanticized Lady Wisdom? |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 12, 2019 12:39:59 GMT
Look, this is gonna be a very intimate question, but... I think I can dare to ask it (if you don't mind): Are you really in love with a someone? Or do I have a really filthy mind and romanticized Lady Wisdom?   (John, I apologize that I haven't answered right after your comments. Last months I usually have not time to concentrate myself and answer something non-brief.) There's a spread meaning about narcotics that they are just the same as any other liquors, beer, or cigarettes. "Fight Club" says that O2 is a dope too. I agree with it. And I think that it's not bad to being love with someone for your rest and for healthiness of your soul. Love is a drug, and I like it as drugs, because they are pure and undiluted. I wish you to find your love and will be happy with her. |
|
