Post by Onetrack on Aug 12, 2018 14:45:57 GMT
It has been 10 months since the attack on the concert from Stephen Paddock at the Mandalay Bay.
Since that day there have been questions. Survivors have had ' accidents ' videos have been released showing no bullet holes, and on the very same day, Clinton had a press conference slamming the NRA and trying to impose gun laws.
I have always had questions.
How did an old man carry so many long weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition up 37 floors without assistance?
If there are over 4000 cameras, why is there only 2 pictures of him in the hotel?
He was there for 10 days, did a maid not enter his room and see stacks of weapons and ammunition?
Why were the windows not broken that he supposedly shot through (shown very clearly in his room from police video)?
Why did the police WANT the cameras off (female officer making sure that they are)?
Why are the majority of injuries from falling/trampling and not bullets if thousands of rounds hit the ground?
The only weapon capable of the fire rate they claim is a belt-fed M246 (you can have an M249 (.50 cal) but its so heavy you have to be prone to use it, and its a 2 man operation) And it'll only run on full auto for 3-5 min without the barrel melting.
An M246 can be wielded can be used by a trained military person, but youth and strength is something Paddock didn't have.
Isn't it convenient the ' lone killer ' was dead when the police breached the room he was in?
I encourage you to watch this through - question the narrative always.
Since that day there have been questions. Survivors have had ' accidents ' videos have been released showing no bullet holes, and on the very same day, Clinton had a press conference slamming the NRA and trying to impose gun laws.
I have always had questions.
How did an old man carry so many long weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition up 37 floors without assistance?
If there are over 4000 cameras, why is there only 2 pictures of him in the hotel?
He was there for 10 days, did a maid not enter his room and see stacks of weapons and ammunition?
Why were the windows not broken that he supposedly shot through (shown very clearly in his room from police video)?
Why did the police WANT the cameras off (female officer making sure that they are)?
Why are the majority of injuries from falling/trampling and not bullets if thousands of rounds hit the ground?
The only weapon capable of the fire rate they claim is a belt-fed M246 (you can have an M249 (.50 cal) but its so heavy you have to be prone to use it, and its a 2 man operation) And it'll only run on full auto for 3-5 min without the barrel melting.
An M246 can be wielded can be used by a trained military person, but youth and strength is something Paddock didn't have.
Isn't it convenient the ' lone killer ' was dead when the police breached the room he was in?
I encourage you to watch this through - question the narrative always.
Attachments:
