|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 17, 2023 22:39:07 GMT
To understand this point better I will begin with the nature of form:
A form is space as evidenced by a circle. There is an inner space, an outer space and the space between the inner and outer space as the form, in this case the circle, itself. Form is just space contradicting itself as space distinguishes itself from itself.
Thought is the same thing; There is the thought(s) that composes the thought, the thought or thoughts the thought composes other thoughts, and the thought between what the thought is composed of and what the thought composes...all of which are thoughts. Thought distinguishes itself from thought.
Phenomena follow this same structure; There are the phenomena which compose the phenomena, the phenomena which composes other phenomena, and the phenomena which is between that which composed of and that which composes...all of which are phenomena. A phenomenon distinguishes itself from itself.
All of this is the distinguishment of an existence from existence as existence thus leaving all things as contradictory.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 18, 2023 15:51:28 GMT
Well, I remember one young female student practicant was talking us, students (back then I studied Chemistry) about dimensions in Math, and she proposed some kind of illustration to it. (I guess since she was a young female I remember her :) )
She said something like this (I might be wrong about details): if you imagine 0d, then if there's a dot, then it can exist, or it cannot exist: there are only two alternatives. If you imagine 1d, you can imagine a line. So, if there's a dot and it's moving along that line, if there occurred an obstacle, that dot couldn't pass through. So, there's a limit to that dot. If you imagine 2d, it's a field, and if a dot appeared to be circled, then there could be no way out, so that dot would be trapped into that circle. If you imagine 3d, then you can imagine a dot being captured into the sphere without any ins and outs. However, if you imagine 4d and others then that dot could go out from that sphere... Then I don't remember exactly what she was talking about, but I guess the idea is quite clear here.
To yours: I don't think we can be sure about all the forms. The variety of forms are such we cannot sure are there any forms that can have not only the inner and the outer space. At least your notifications are well for only certain dimenstion cases. Must be added also, that dimenstion aren't the only restrictions to the forms. What if a certain form exist trancendentally?
By the way, do you think God have form?
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 24, 2023 19:39:23 GMT
Well, I remember one young female student practicant was talking us, students (back then I studied Chemistry) about dimensions in Math, and she proposed some kind of illustration to it. (I guess since she was a young female I remember her  ) She said something like this (I might be wrong about details): if you imagine 0d, then if there's a dot, then it can exist, or it cannot exist: there are only two alternatives. If you imagine 1d, you can imagine a line. So, if there's a dot and it's moving along that line, if there occurred an obstacle, that dot couldn't pass through. So, there's a limit to that dot. If you imagine 2d, it's a field, and if a dot appeared to be circled, then there could be no way out, so that dot would be trapped into that circle. If you imagine 3d, then you can imagine a dot being captured into the sphere without any ins and outs. However, if you imagine 4d and others then that dot could go out from that sphere... Then I don't remember exactly what she was talking about, but I guess the idea is quite clear here. To yours: I don't think we can be sure about all the forms. The variety of forms are such we cannot sure are there any forms that can have not only the inner and the outer space. At least your notifications are well for only certain dimenstion cases. Must be added also, that dimenstion aren't the only restrictions to the forms. What if a certain form exist trancendentally? By the way, do you think God have form? 1. The dot exists as a dot and seperates the forms from eachother; it is an observation of relation thus exists. 2. The dot in itself is formless thus does not exist as existence requires form. 3. The dot as relative exists. The dot as absolute does not exist as it has no comparison. 4. The dot is a paradox. As to God we can follow the same logic of the dot and say God is a paradox. This is considering the dot is the origin of all things just as God is the origin of all things. |
|
)