|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 12, 2023 23:38:39 GMT
A perfectly balanced life is effectively nothing as one extreme is counterbalanced by another extreme. This equilibrium results in a self negation of the qualities involved and as such observes a state of no-thingness, i.e. the absence of thingness. From this it may be implied that a morality of balance is a morality promoting a state of cessation of form.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 7, 2023 19:36:12 GMT
But I would say that such a situation is impossible: there is a contradiction, because either there are no absolute powerful bullet, or no absolutely bulletproof vest. If you put, let's say, gods there the contradiction will be increased: the absolutely powerful god1 vs absolutely powerful god2 There must be only the one of them, or none of them. Those 'gods' doesn't result in nothing. Your version, as far as I can assume (I might be wrong also) that both those gods might exist, while logic says it's impossible. I guess you havent seen the 4-BAR its a single shot T-rex rifle that shoots a 2225g led slug thats 1" wide and to give you an idea of how powerful it is A 12 gauge with +P buck shot has a 35lb shoulder recoil whereas the 4-BAR has 212 lb shoulder recoil and that 2000 plus grain bullet will go through 8 cinder blocks side by side from 100 yards away and is said to have 4x the take down power of a 50-BMG sniper rifle . I should say! That thing is no doubt completely lethal. I wonder could it kill a big whale or something more greater?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 17, 2023 17:29:28 GMT
Up and down exist and even though both are relative their existence within certain contexts, due to said contexts, is absolute...yet both exist. Up is absolute within a given context (i.e. the starting point of the ground pointed away from it). Down is absolute within another context (i.e. the starting point of the sky pointed away from it). Both exist as absolute within a context yet are complete opposites. Absolutes may be opposites. Sorry, but no. "up & down" are irrelevant as well as North & South, or "right vs left". To be relevant your "ups" or "downs" should be the absolute ups or the absolute downs. There are no absolute dominance of the ups or downs. They co-exist. The simplest example is balance in Galileo sense. (From his definition on movement.) There are absolute opposites as explained before, right and left are absolutes within a given context. As to dominance it is also absolute in a given context. If a bullet cannot be stopped within a given context then it has absolute dominance in that given context...context allows for absolutes as a thing can only occur within a given context.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 17, 2023 19:32:40 GMT
Sorry, but no. "up & down" are irrelevant as well as North & South, or "right vs left". To be relevant your "ups" or "downs" should be the absolute ups or the absolute downs. There are no absolute dominance of the ups or downs. They co-exist. The simplest example is balance in Galileo sense. (From his definition on movement.) There are absolute opposites as explained before, right and left are absolutes within a given context. As to dominance it is also absolute in a given context. If a bullet cannot be stopped within a given context then it has absolute dominance in that given context...context allows for absolutes as a thing can only occur within a given context. Without contexts? It's impossible. Metaphysics isn't allowed since the positivism hasn't completely destroyed it. The Earth's North and The Earth's South, right movement and left movement, absolute left amd absolute right spin of quarks... The truth is – there are no non-context things, because only things exist, only materialism is correct. Ideal deities don't exist. Of course we can use language whatever we want to, and in almost every time it is going on. Words have no firm meaning. Under "absolute" you can think yours, I can think mine. But in reality we can't have it. This is the proof why reality is strong and only the reality exist. In the reality there are no absoluteness, there are only phenomena.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 17, 2023 21:53:55 GMT
There are absolute opposites as explained before, right and left are absolutes within a given context. As to dominance it is also absolute in a given context. If a bullet cannot be stopped within a given context then it has absolute dominance in that given context...context allows for absolutes as a thing can only occur within a given context. Without contexts? It's impossible. Metaphysics isn't allowed since the positivism hasn't completely destroyed it. The Earth's North and The Earth's South, right movement and left movement, absolute left amd absolute right spin of quarks... The truth is – there are no non-context things, because only things exist, only materialism is correct. Ideal deities don't exist. Of course we can use language whatever we want to, and in almost every time it is going on. Words have no firm meaning. Under "absolute" you can think yours, I can think mine. But in reality we can't have it. This is the proof why reality is strong and only the reality exist. In the reality there are no absoluteness, there are only phenomena. 1. The phenomena existing is absolute. The relation of one phenomenon to another, which in the great chain of contexts, is absolute. A phenomenon only occuring in x,y,z contexts is absolute as it can only exist within those contexts. Relativity results in absolutes, this is a paradox. 2. The statement "words have no firm meaning" has no firm meaning if words have no firm meaning...this ends in contradiction. 3. If everything is only matter then matter is the same as no-thing as it means everything. It is the same as saying "there is only space". But considering space self-contradicts itself through form, i.e. a form is a space between spaces as in the division of space through space, then anything can occur.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 18, 2023 9:17:41 GMT
Without contexts? It's impossible. Metaphysics isn't allowed since the positivism hasn't completely destroyed it. The Earth's North and The Earth's South, right movement and left movement, absolute left amd absolute right spin of quarks... The truth is – there are no non-context things, because only things exist, only materialism is correct. Ideal deities don't exist. Of course we can use language whatever we want to, and in almost every time it is going on. Words have no firm meaning. Under "absolute" you can think yours, I can think mine. But in reality we can't have it. This is the proof why reality is strong and only the reality exist. In the reality there are no absoluteness, there are only phenomena. 1. The phenomena existing is absolute. The relation of one phenomenon to another, which in the great chain of contexts, is absolute. A phenomenon only occuring in x,y,z contexts is absolute as it can only exist within those contexts. Relativity results in absolutes, this is a paradox. 2. The statement "words have no firm meaning" has no firm meaning if words have no firm meaning...this ends in contradiction. 3. If everything is only matter then matter is the same as no-thing as it means everything. It is the same as saying "there is only space". But considering space self-contradicts itself through form, i.e. a form is a space between spaces as in the division of space through space, then anything can occur. 1. Paradoxes are in your head. Removing thinking cut this problem out. 2. "Contradiction" is oxymoron. Since words have no firm meaning, no contradictions occur. 3. If there's matter, no need to say anything. Words have no meaning, it results in: words is the source of plenty confuses. Paradoxes will be occurring unless a person becomes a silent keeper.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 24, 2023 19:22:26 GMT
1. The phenomena existing is absolute. The relation of one phenomenon to another, which in the great chain of contexts, is absolute. A phenomenon only occuring in x,y,z contexts is absolute as it can only exist within those contexts. Relativity results in absolutes, this is a paradox. 2. The statement "words have no firm meaning" has no firm meaning if words have no firm meaning...this ends in contradiction. 3. If everything is only matter then matter is the same as no-thing as it means everything. It is the same as saying "there is only space". But considering space self-contradicts itself through form, i.e. a form is a space between spaces as in the division of space through space, then anything can occur. 1. Paradoxes are in your head. Removing thinking cut this problem out. 2. "Contradiction" is oxymoron. Since words have no firm meaning, no contradictions occur. 3. If there's matter, no need to say anything. Words have no meaning, it results in: words is the source of plenty confuses. Paradoxes will be occurring unless a person becomes a silent keeper. 1. 'To remove thinking' is a thought...albeit a negative one (i.e. describing a thing by what it is not) but a thought none the less. 2. If words have no firm meaning then the statement "Words have no firm meaning" has no firm meaning and it negates itself. 3. Paradoxes and contradictions occur outside of language, an example of this is space. For example: a. There is a circle. b. There is the space inside a circle. c. There is the space outside the circle. d. There is the space between the inner and outer spaces which is the circle itself. f. Space is divided against itself through forms as forms are space dividing space as space. g. Space contradicts itself.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on May 28, 2023 10:15:41 GMT
Dude give it a rest your not leaving a legacy or anything like that so stop spamming with so many topics you dont need 4 new stupid no thing topics a day just to talk about the same dumb short buss stuff that you always talk about .
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jun 2, 2023 19:26:30 GMT
Dude give it a rest your not leaving a legacy or anything like that so stop spamming with so many topics you dont need 4 new stupid no thing topics a day just to talk about the same dumb short buss stuff that you always talk about . And your whole post applies to itself. Really? "4 new stupid no thing topics a day"...I am here once or twice a week...facepalm...
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Jun 4, 2023 22:23:50 GMT
Dude give it a rest your not leaving a legacy or anything like that so stop spamming with so many topics you dont need 4 new stupid no thing topics a day just to talk about the same dumb short buss stuff that you always talk about . And your whole post applies to itself. Really? "4 new stupid no thing topics a day"...I am here once or twice a week...facepalm... I'm sorry I should have said 10 to 20 each time you're here. Obviously it's an exaggeration to point out the ridiculous amount of unneeded new topics you start when you could jumble up three or four nonsensical pseudo philosophy question / rhetorical statements into one post because they definitely don't need their own separate thread that's for sure especially when they all circle around to the same no thing concept that you keep humping
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jun 21, 2023 17:51:54 GMT
And your whole post applies to itself. Really? "4 new stupid no thing topics a day"...I am here once or twice a week...facepalm... I'm sorry I should have said 10 to 20 each time you're here. Obviously it's an exaggeration to point out the ridiculous amount of unneeded new topics you start when you could jumble up three or four nonsensical pseudo philosophy question / rhetorical statements into one post because they definitely don't need their own separate thread that's for sure especially when they all circle around to the same no thing concept that you keep humping And where are your threads?
|
|