Who is America and Why are they so Divided?

Missing the vital pieces of the puzzle.

Its history was based on the pillage of Native land.
That karma will divide america until it destroys itself.

The alternative would be to embrace that ancient spirit.
The length of the video I skipped thru does not even mention them.

And thats the problem.

Embrace that ancient spirit? So, to avoid destruction we should adopt the culture of the Natives of our land? Well, for me that would mean building great cities with giant earthen pyramids in the in the center, ruled autocratically by preist-god-kings that claim descent from the sun, which is worshipped as the chief god of our polytheistic pantheon, that is appeased by mass human sacrifices. I'm down for it but its going to be very hard to convince the people around me that I am am a living god that is descended from the sun. 

It's not a nation, it's a corporation, which poses as a nation. Powerful in what terms? Even UK was the powerful nation, in 1700's,but what has happened to it now? US is developed because of army, but, still, it does not mean that they have got everything right. There are lot of issues, within US itself, and that power is only yielded by some , not by everyone.

In today's time, USA is well beyond past of it's yester years, and has already collapsed. I don't know, what power does it hold anyways? They have hardly won any war after 1945. Their only exports were software and hollywood, apart from that, what have they been manufacturing? 

China itself is a nation which is built on  pillaging  it's own people, then, what else to expect? 

Yes, you are right. It were European settlers, who borrowed the continent, by creating laws, and they gave useless lands of American continent to natives, where, no one can even yield anything. You are right, the time is coming that natives will claim their own continent back, because, America belongs to the native indians.

It's coming anyways.

Well, I was simply making a joke, but it is a joke that contains an important truth. The jokes' premise is that it actually DOESN'T conform to the stereotypes any white person fetishizing Native Americans will have. When white people, whether American or foreign, fetishize the Natives of this continent (not mentioning you specifically or implying that you are, just a lot of white people in general), they always choose as the object of their obsession the Natives of the United States and Canada specifically, and not say... the Aztecs or the Mayans, because the Aztecs and Mayans were brutal, imperialistic, human sacrificing civilizations that can't be romanticized as noble savages.

The white man fetishizing Native North Americans have this idea of this pure, peaceful, egalitarian, hunter gatherer culture on horseback that lives in harmony with nature and thanks the spirit of the deer when he kills the deer, and is so much more moral than the white man lecturing him about environmentalism like Captain Planet, constantly crying about the buffalo, and whose hands are completely clean of any historical crimes against each other or the white man whatsoever.

This noble savage stereotype of Natives is a very simplified picture of a very diverse and very complex multitude of peoples (there is no homogeneous Native American culture) invented by the Hippies and the counter culture movement in the 1960's that reflects more the values of white West Coast hippies in opposition to their WW2 veteran 1950s era traditional American parents rather than any actual Native culture that ever existed in pre-Columbian America. This kind of fetishization of so called, 'less civilized peoples' has a long precedent in the history of Western Civilization going back to the Roman Empire and Tacitus's Germania where he gave the same, 'noble savage' treatment to my ancestors.

The point of the joke that I told is that the Native Americans that lived in my area and over almost the entirety of the Southern and Midwestern United States were far more similar to the Aztecs and the Mayans then they were to any notion of the hunter gatherer noble savage. The land where I am sitting right now was in pre-Columbian times part of a Native American kingdom called Cofitachequi, which itself was the Easternmost extent of the vast Mississippian civilization that covered a truly enormous part of the United states. This civilization was an urban one with great cities on the Aztec or Mayan model centered around great earthen pyramids, that possessed plazas for ball games, temples, market places, and residential areas, with one of these cities being larger and more populous than London was at the same time. If you go to Illinois you can visit this city, called Cahokia, which has a great pyramid in the center that has a base the size of the Great Pyramid of Giza.

The Mississippian culture was hierarchical being run by preist-god-kings that were thought to be descended from the sun. This was important because like the Aztecs they were polytheistic and, like the Japanese, their chief deity was the sun god. In the name of these gods they committed mass human sacrifices like the Aztecs or Mayans. They had a kind of feudalism in which lesser cities in the region were vassals and had to pay tribute to the most important settlement in the kingdom. Their society fed itself by farming vast quantities Maize farmed by peasants, they had art, sculptures, rudimentary metal working, and when our 'Hernando Cortez' the conquistador Hernando De Soto came to conquer their land they were formidable enough to defeat him outright and repel the Spanish from their territory. It was like an outpost of Central America in the mainland United States, indeed, their civilization almost certainly began in Central America.

My point behind all of this is that the noble savage characterization of Native North Americans is largely a myth and a revolting and offensive one that actual Natives tend to cringe at when they see white people perpetuating it. They are in fact far more interesting and varied than this. Some Indians were agriculturalists, some were hunter gatherers, some were very primitive tribes, others carved whole cities into stone, some were akin to Mongol horse tribes, some were nomadic desert wanders, some were very peaceful, others, like the Comanche were the Native American version of ISIS in their brutality, some were monotheistic, some were polytheistic, most were animistic in some manner, some fought viciously against the encroaching Europeans, others sided with the Europeans against other Native tribes that were their ancestral enemies who they indeed saw just as foreign as the Europeans and hated much more. They also took land from one another, genocided  other tribes, and enslaved them as well, the five civilized tribes in the American South that were famously put on the trail of tears owned plantations with black slaves, and were the last peoples to free their slaves fighting to the end to keep them. In many native societies how much honor you could gain from a defeated foe came from how brutally you tortured them. They have fascinating folkloric creatures in their mythologies like Wendigos, raven mockers, dragons, fairies, cannibalistic flying heads, skin walkers, owl witches, deer women, and a vigorous spiritual world, and interesting religious traditions with fanciful cosmologies, gods, and myths.

In my state there were two tribes that lived here near one another whose languages were as distinct from each other as English is from Mandarin Chinese, so when you say we need to embrace that, "ancient spirit". Which ancient spirit are you talking about?