Creation of Everything and God's Masterplan

I agree. It must be that the consciousness (I believe it was God) must exist before. Or else, I don't even know what to think. 
Reading your articles and comment I understand one important thing for me - I guess I do know know physics, or what I had learn in school was crap. Unfortunately, I'm not so well-minded. I have to read, and reread books to get thoughts in a more straight, clear way. 

This is one thing you've said that remarks my attention in the most bright way: "the material is not free to go were consciousness goes" ('were' means 'where', right?). You know, I guess this is something that hits (or strikes, etc) the materialism intensively hard. 

You can't logically wrap any god from any religion into a conceptual box and it not have with it tons of contradictions because their all man made attempts to conceptually understand and convey the "thing" and or "things" that is and or are responsible for the cosmos, can't me done yet over and over again (over 5200 times currently) people have created a model and have failed because theirs always going to be someone that's smarter then the person and or persons that created said religion that can and does find the flaws and discrepancies hidden within said religion and then there are the followers of these religions going behind with duct tape trying to patch the spots that are falling off do to said persons dismantling there religions concepts (apologetics)

This is a good remark indeed, but if someone isn't allowed to think or to guess about something, than how to do except for believing in it? How to compare which religion is better or finer, and so on? And if gods are out of any chances to be captured by our inner mind sets, then how do we know about them anyway? – However, I would say that belief is not so unimportant. Faith and Belief are usually underrated. Our intuitions aren't worse, than our minds. (I don't know the sources of intuition, I guess it comes from heart or somewhere else.) Mind is mind, a heart is a heart.
If I feel that something isn't okay, then why not to trust to it? You know, before we became people we were apes, and before that we were trilobites or something, but even being apes somehow we got minds. For me it is a sign that conveys the mind is not only the one thing we have to be absolutely focused. The mind should not become a dictator to our body. I guess.

I didn't say that we aren't aloud to think about it and contemplate on it what I said was that a person cannot grasp the entire thing using language and give it to others much like you can't put the sea in a cup and let the sand dry out so you can vacuum at the bottom of the ocean and yet people try.

The other thing that I notice is that some eastern man made a concept popular here in the west I can't remember his name but I think he was part of the theosophical society anyways he said that everything is consciousness and to this day people still ecco his words yet they are contradicting to other beliefs typically held by the same individuals which is that the human being is a micro cosmic replica of the cosmos as above so below
But if we look at the human only about 5% is conscious while the mechanical aspect is ran unconscious and was created unconscious only to later on gain conciseness as it matured so then if we are a mini reality then that would mean that everything is not consciousness and that consciousness is a byproduct of unconsciousness

Was it Paul Tillich?

And now I can't say I understand you about the semantics. A thought of mine was not about "how big" or "great", "vast", or "broad" something in our heads. How are one supposed to measure it anyway? By sculpin' out our scull boxes? An idea of a monstrous whale is bigger, than an idea of a tiny insect? Then what about the image in binoculars and a microscope, are they have the same size?

Well, firstly, of course I am not disagree about that remark about the limits of knowledge. Yes, our speculations of God are not the true investigation of it. Let's say if we are hunting for ectoplasma and we trace something (maybe some jellyfish ooze, or something similar) it is a better resource, because we can not only grasp it, cut it, smell it, drop it, push or pull it, but we can think about it, imagine it, and then go back to it again. Non empirical way bring us less materials (however, I am not against rational as Descartes way; I think Descartes himself had demonstrated how brilliant his investigations could be, and he acted less empirically, which is the fact).