|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Sept 14, 2022 9:59:37 GMT
An international team led by Université de Montréal researchers has discovered an exoplanet they believe may be up to 30% water — meaning it could be the first known ocean planet.
Why it matters: Liquid water is necessary for life as we know it, so if we want to find evidence of extraterrestrial life, an exoplanet covered in large bodies of water would be a good place to start.
Decades of searching space have yet to reveal an ocean planet — Earth is still the only place we know of with bodies of liquid water on its surface — but we are also very limited in what we can observe about distant planets.
Up to 30% of TOI-1452 b’s mass could be from water, according to the team’s modeling.
What’s new: The UdeM team has now discovered a promising ocean planet candidate in the “Goldilocks zone” of a star 100 light-years from Earth.
They first noticed signs of the exoplanet, TOI-1452 b, in data collected by NASA’s TESS space telescope. They then conducted follow-up observations of it using UdeM’s Mont Mégantic Observatory and Hawaii’s Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope.
Based on those observations, the exoplanet appears to be about 70% larger than Earth with just five times its mass. That means it’s less dense than Earth, where metal and rock account for 99% of the planet’s mass and water accounts for just 1%. www.freethink.com/space/ocean-planet
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 18, 2022 21:19:05 GMT
How on earth can they tell that it is less dence then earth? From that far away?
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Sept 19, 2022 7:26:40 GMT
How on earth can they tell that it is less dence then earth? From that far away? You're right, on Earth this cannot be said, only far from it – via the Hubble. There is no facts, there are hypothesis or theories. Means higher percentages.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Sept 19, 2022 13:22:03 GMT
How on earth can they tell that it is less dence then earth? From that far away? You're right, on Earth this cannot be said, only far from it – via the Hubble. There is no facts, there are hypothesis or theories. Means higher percentages. I'd love to watch the process they have to do inorder to come to the conclusions that they do
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Sept 19, 2022 13:48:26 GMT
You're right, on Earth this cannot be said, only far from it – via the Hubble. There is no facts, there are hypothesis or theories. Means higher percentages. I'd love to watch the process they have to do inorder to come to the conclusions that they do I don't think it's an easy task for a person. I remember I was young student, and practiced in the research lab in oil research institution. Even there to comprehend all the steps would not cost that time. It's not impossible, but too wide and big process. I don't want to imagine how precise, large, and complex this astronomy research is.
|
|