|
|
Post by fortharris on Aug 6, 2022 6:30:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Aug 6, 2022 15:37:48 GMT
Your page is mostly black, which means to me that there are NO wonders of God. YOU ARE WRONG! Because in mythology there is at least one God that created light. Your page should be white. If you cannot make it white, you are saying that there cannot be any light without a luminary, that the myth of God creating light is a falsity. So, you're a heretic. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 6, 2022 17:41:39 GMT
Your page is mostly black, which means to me that there are NO wonders of God. YOU ARE WRONG! Because in mythology there is at least one God that created light. Your page should be white. If you cannot make it white, you are saying that there cannot be any light without a luminary, that the myth of God creating light is a falsity. So, you're a heretic. I've seen the video, here's the link: I think any cosmological arguments shares the same sense, and almost every time breaks through one mistake: any wonders are subjective. I cannot say that the presented wonders are so good, and good for each time. But I guess this objection is not good. It lacks many points. However, there is more sufficient objection to the cosmological versions, here it is: (a) for each person is correctly to say that he has a system of values (it doesn't matter whether he changes it, or not) (b) if he's got the value system, then it's logically for this system to have maximum and minimum values (no matter is max = min, or not) (c) any wonders are just those maximums On one hand we can imply that there are wonders, but there are no necessities about their commonness. Therefore, it might happen that for two persons A and B their maximums or wonders are opposite. Such a case would lead to contradiction. |
|
