Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on Jun 30, 2022 1:26:47 GMT
Brazilian woman are, in my opinion, the most lustful type of woman you can date. They are insidious, but careful, I confess. But the absurd lust and search for pleasure corrupts everything which is truthful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 5, 2022 21:20:33 GMT
I guess there are no "Brazilian" or "American", or "Ukrainian", or "Britain" women. Each woman is unique whenever she lives. Each person is the whole universe. We've forgotten good human relationships.
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP 
Elder
Posts: 2,692 
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Jul 25, 2022 17:52:42 GMT
I guess there are no "Brazilian" or "American", or "Ukrainian", or "Britain" women. Each woman is unique whenever she lives. Each person is the whole universe. We've forgotten good human relationships. A few thoughts. While the individual is the most important unit of humanity and each individual is unique, culture is all important. I've seen people who you can tell beneath all the bs is a good person at heart but their morality is completely degraded by growing up with absolutely terrible cultural values. Their goodness is warped by what they've been taught and socialized into to the point where it is useless. Second it must be pointed out that countries like "America", "Brazil", and "Britain" are artificial constructs. They are civic entities not cultural entities that say nothing about the people living in them. Very rarely does a country, a political entity, contain one only one culture and one people. This is especially true of very large countries like Brazil or the United States. Brazil has five different regions with differing cultures with different influences from Natives, Europeans, Africans, and even the Japanese. The European descended culture of the South is not the same as the African influenced culture of the Northeast. The United States is likewise not one culture. Different groups of people settled in different parts of the country creating different cultures with different values. My state is separated into two such cultures. I can always tell when someone is from the Upstate of South Carolina instantly by accent, appearance, and attitude. This is because Upstate South Carolina is part of the Upland South and not the Deep South as is the rest of the state. Even a smaller country like Britain is full of a bunch of cultural groups. English, Scots, Welsh, Cornish, but England itself is also separated into Northern England and Southern England and they have different cultures and are really different people. Countries are rarely a useful way to categorize humanity except through international politics because they are political entities. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 26, 2022 5:56:04 GMT
I guess there are no "Brazilian" or "American", or "Ukrainian", or "Britain" women. Each woman is unique whenever she lives. Each person is the whole universe. We've forgotten good human relationships. A few thoughts. While the individual is the most important unit of humanity and each individual is unique, culture is all important. I've seen people who you can tell beneath all the bs is a good person at heart but their morality is completely degraded by growing up with absolutely terrible cultural values. Their goodness is warped by what they've been taught and socialized into to the point where it is useless. Second it must be pointed out that countries like "America", "Brazil", and "Britain" are artificial constructs. They are civic entities not cultural entities that say nothing about the people living in them. Very rarely does a country, a political entity, contain one only one culture and one people. This is especially true of very large countries like Brazil or the United States. Brazil has five different regions with differing cultures with different influences from Natives, Europeans, Africans, and even the Japanese. The European descended culture of the South is not the same as the African influenced culture of the Northeast. The United States is likewise not one culture. Different groups of people settled in different parts of the country creating different cultures with different values. My state is separated into two such cultures. I can always tell when someone is from the Upstate of South Carolina instantly by accent, appearance, and attitude. This is because Upstate South Carolina is part of the Upland South and not the Deep South as is the rest of the state. Even a smaller country like Britain is full of a bunch of cultural groups. English, Scots, Welsh, Cornish, but England itself is also separated into Northern England and Southern England and they have different cultures and are really different people. Countries are rarely a useful way to categorize humanity except through international politics because they are political entities. Can't say I disagree. Two points: a) the whole humanity, I suppose, should have some image or some prestige... I don't know, for the aliens of the outer space maybe. I mean what if the unknown civilization from the cosmos would have visit us, and if they would have found nothing, but barbarians, I don't think for us it would be good. In this sense, cultures are important parts like for some respectful image for further trading traditions in cosmos =) b) this problem of invididual/social, or an individuum/culture is really important for me, but from another angle. I mean the next one: I meet different people and sometimes it seems like they're rather copying someone, than being themselves. Like they rather keep on their own position, than wishing some changes. My personal belief is that a person must have some abilities to change. I don't think that we are what we are once and for all. Or, I cannot say about myself (because, I know that I may be wrong about the other people, it's just my own opinion) that I know everything, so I can't say that everything what I'm doing is totally the true way. Seems like people are deeper or even more interesting if to keep digging into themselves. However, it's just an opinion, so that is why I need that problem to think about. And culture is a possible image. Maybe the genetics can reveal us something, maybe we cannot change to whichever we'd like to. So, it's still a problem. Your first point is what I support, I mean the reasons you're proposing about it. Indeed, the culture is some kind of a background and not paying attention to this may lead to some queer (strange) conclusions. Your 2nd point is indeed correct. Exactly. It's like more political, rather than real stuff. It might have happened if even without a small community (let's say 100,000 people) there might be not less, than 20 cultures. I don't know such cases not being an expert here, but as for me it's not impossible for such a case to occur. Oh, I never thought of US as one or two, or three cultures. I've already posted a post about Howard Lovecraft and Robert Howard who were friends, but they were living in different regions of US. Unlike Lovecraft who lived in the North (New England?), Rober Howard lived in Texas. And some in the Net created a meme when ironized the idea about the world of writers. Briefly, if one lives in the North he's got the fiction worlds similar to Lovecraft (mocky, cold, green-blue, creepy, etc), but you one lives somewhere in Texas he's got his fictions worlds similar to Robert Howard (bravy, hot, red-yellow, heroic, doric, etc). Yeah, even the example of Ireland and the Northern Ireland can illustrate your point. There are true many cultures. One of such that comes into my mind is a movie (I really like it) "Odd Man Out" (1947). Sometimes one may guess how about that - how can it be that even Britain is so different from the inside? And yes, it is also important not to pay attention to one's own individuality also, but to not forget about the traditions of your own culture... However, exactly this moment for me is quite deeper. I mean I accept the concept of culture and its consequences (as what you've brought), but along with it for me the culture is something even deeper. It's like it has got the education aspects, the styles of discussions, and many other aspects. And if I wish to develop or to evolve the culture I have to care about those parts of it. (This is just my way of thinking, I prefer to analyze, to divide into parts to try to solve a problem. I think it's just a more easier way.) |
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Jul 27, 2022 2:42:59 GMT
A few thoughts. While the individual is the most important unit of humanity and each individual is unique, culture is all important. I've seen people who you can tell beneath all the bs is a good person at heart but their morality is completely degraded by growing up with absolutely terrible cultural values. Their goodness is warped by what they've been taught and socialized into to the point where it is useless. Second it must be pointed out that countries like "America", "Brazil", and "Britain" are artificial constructs. They are civic entities not cultural entities that say nothing about the people living in them. Very rarely does a country, a political entity, contain one only one culture and one people. This is especially true of very large countries like Brazil or the United States. Brazil has five different regions with differing cultures with different influences from Natives, Europeans, Africans, and even the Japanese. The European descended culture of the South is not the same as the African influenced culture of the Northeast. The United States is likewise not one culture. Different groups of people settled in different parts of the country creating different cultures with different values. My state is separated into two such cultures. I can always tell when someone is from the Upstate of South Carolina instantly by accent, appearance, and attitude. This is because Upstate South Carolina is part of the Upland South and not the Deep South as is the rest of the state. Even a smaller country like Britain is full of a bunch of cultural groups. English, Scots, Welsh, Cornish, but England itself is also separated into Northern England and Southern England and they have different cultures and are really different people. Countries are rarely a useful way to categorize humanity except through international politics because they are political entities. Can't say I disagree. Two points: a) the whole humanity, I suppose, should have some image or some prestige... I don't know, for the aliens of the outer space maybe. I mean what if the unknown civilization from the cosmos would have visit us, and if they would have found nothing, but barbarians, I don't think for us it would be good. In this sense, cultures are important parts like for some respectful image for further trading traditions in cosmos =) b) this problem of invididual/social, or an individuum/culture is really important for me, but from another angle. I mean the next one: I meet different people and sometimes it seems like they're rather copying someone, than being themselves. Like they rather keep on their own position, than wishing some changes. My personal belief is that a person must have some abilities to change. I don't think that we are what we are once and for all. Or, I cannot say about myself (because, I know that I may be wrong about the other people, it's just my own opinion) that I know everything, so I can't say that everything what I'm doing is totally the true way. Seems like people are deeper or even more interesting if to keep digging into themselves. However, it's just an opinion, so that is why I need that problem to think about. And culture is a possible image. Maybe the genetics can reveal us something, maybe we cannot change to whichever we'd like to. So, it's still a problem. Your first point is what I support, I mean the reasons you're proposing about it. Indeed, the culture is some kind of a background and not paying attention to this may lead to some queer (strange) conclusions. Your 2nd point is indeed correct. Exactly. It's like more political, rather than real stuff. It might have happened if even without a small community (let's say 100,000 people) there might be not less, than 20 cultures. I don't know such cases not being an expert here, but as for me it's not impossible for such a case to occur. Oh, I never thought of US as one or two, or three cultures. I've already posted a post about Howard Lovecraft and Robert Howard who were friends, but they were living in different regions of US. Unlike Lovecraft who lived in the North (New England?), Rober Howard lived in Texas. And some in the Net created a meme when ironized the idea about the world of writers. Briefly, if one lives in the North he's got the fiction worlds similar to Lovecraft (mocky, cold, green-blue, creepy, etc), but you one lives somewhere in Texas he's got his fictions worlds similar to Robert Howard (bravy, hot, red-yellow, heroic, doric, etc). Yeah, even the example of Ireland and the Northern Ireland can illustrate your point. There are true many cultures. One of such that comes into my mind is a movie (I really like it) "Odd Man Out" (1947). Sometimes one may guess how about that - how can it be that even Britain is so different from the inside? And yes, it is also important not to pay attention to one's own individuality also, but to not forget about the traditions of your own culture... However, exactly this moment for me is quite deeper. I mean I accept the concept of culture and its consequences (as what you've brought), but along with it for me the culture is something even deeper. It's like it has got the education aspects, the styles of discussions, and many other aspects. And if I wish to develop or to evolve the culture I have to care about those parts of it. (This is just my way of thinking, I prefer to analyze, to divide into parts to try to solve a problem. I think it's just a more easier way.) You mentioned the influence of H.P Lovecraft and Robert E. Howard's regional cultures on their writings. That is absolutely true. This article here talks about the influence of Robert E. Howard's culture the Scots-Irish descended Upland Southern culture of Western Texas on Conan the Barbarian. You should give it read as you'd find it interesting. www.abbevilleinstitute.org/conan-the-southerner/ |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jul 27, 2022 4:35:45 GMT
But the absurd lust and search for pleasure corrupts everything which is truthful. Whatever one lusts for whether money or something else is their downfall if they let lust win. Lust is meant to be a driving force of being a better you not a force of a corrupt you. |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Jul 27, 2022 10:23:58 GMT
South African women only seem to care about money
and the social status that implies.
|
|
rexa
Junior Member
Posts: 78
Likes: 16
|
Post by rexa on May 7, 2023 17:30:09 GMT
Types of women and you confined it to the appearance. Great..perhaps there is nothing more to a woman you forsee
|
|
rexa
Junior Member
Posts: 78
Likes: 16
|
Post by rexa on May 7, 2023 17:32:46 GMT
But the absurd lust and search for pleasure corrupts everything which is truthful. Whatever one lusts for whether money or something else is their downfall if they let lust win. Lust is meant to be a driving force of being a better you not a force of a corrupt you. the whole nature of lust is towards corruption if one chooses to envelop in it. How can such a Powerful negative energy can be the source of motivation and goodness. Its not leading to anything meaningful or substantial. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on May 19, 2023 2:03:40 GMT
Types of women and you confined it to the appearance. Great..perhaps there is nothing more to a woman you forsee Technically to get the whole picture of a person we have to consider how they are on the outside and on the inside. Like how do they make themselves appear and if it aligns with who they are within. That is the best to classify a type of women and even a type of person in general. |
|
rexa
Junior Member
Posts: 78
Likes: 16
|
Post by rexa on Jun 11, 2023 20:41:12 GMT
Types of women and you confined it to the appearance. Great..perhaps there is nothing more to a woman you forsee Technically to get the whole picture of a person we have to consider how they are on the outside and on the inside. Like how do they make themselves appear and if it aligns with who they are within. That is the best to classify a type of women and even a type of person in general. you narrowed it down to the type of person basically nor woman. Types of women are loving, sincere, cunning, goldigger, materialistic, sweet, loyal. Etc. Your description basically showcases whether a person is truthful or not. For some it is easily noticeable for others it takes time. Like for example two people broke up with there respective partners and started dating but made others feel that they are just friends |
|
