|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jun 24, 2022 19:39:31 GMT
Far Right organizations restricted the abortion. Many women are complaining about that saying that the system now turns into a complete government machine that controls the birth.
Is this true? I only heard about it a little, but didn't get the sense of it. Maybe somebody knows this better?
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Aug 2, 2022 7:57:01 GMT
Um no it's literally not possible for the human race to come from just 2 people no mammal can withstand that much line breeding can't happen And science is on my side on this one as much as I hate science they at least genetically agree that we didn't all come from 2 people especially not 2 people then again after a flood where 1 family fucked themselves till kingdom cum (pun intended) Not to mention the ark is a symbolic representation of the mind it was not a literal thing because even if you render all the animals in existence now down to basic subgroups which would eliminate about 75% of all the animals you still would have to load so many per minute that it's not possible let alone the food for them and let's not mention the sheer size that the ark would have to be I believe somewhere around 6 or 7 football fields if I'm not mistaken in size However you seen the Bible's description of how big the ark was that would mean that each animal would only have about 0.27cu.ft of space Good luck getting an elephant to fit in a quarter of a cubic foot so to speak which is stretching it anyways so it's just absolutely in no way possible but it is a great story that you'll never forget which is the whole point of it and it's an allegory Two people can have like 20 kids or more. It has been recorded before. Then their kids can have that many too and so on. So very easy to do and people still keep populating to keep the human race going. 2 weeks ago I met a lady who has 13 siblings which to me is too much but hey nothing I can do there but I personally disapprove of too many kids. Are you thinking of big adult animals? Just a tiny baby would do from each gender. So with just 2 baby elephants on board it would be a ton of elephants in the end not just one big one of absolutely no use whatsover unless as dinner or something. I dated a girl that was 1 of 13 kids... I don't care if you have 30 kids that still doesn't avoid incest which the amount of incest required to get us to today is not possible we could have all died of genetic defects long before making it this far And are genetics show that we definitely didn't come from 2 people . The garden story is in no way literal
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 2, 2022 19:11:45 GMT
Two people can have like 20 kids or more. It has been recorded before. Then their kids can have that many too and so on. So very easy to do and people still keep populating to keep the human race going. 2 weeks ago I met a lady who has 13 siblings which to me is too much but hey nothing I can do there but I personally disapprove of too many kids. Are you thinking of big adult animals? Just a tiny baby would do from each gender. So with just 2 baby elephants on board it would be a ton of elephants in the end not just one big one of absolutely no use whatsover unless as dinner or something. I dated a girl that was 1 of 13 kids... I don't care if you have 30 kids that still doesn't avoid incest which the amount of incest required to get us to today is not possible we could have all died of genetic defects long before making it this far And are genetics show that we definitely didn't come from 2 people . The garden story is in no way literal Adam and Eve weren't brother and sister though. Incest started from their kids and on. People nowadays are still allowed to marry cousins and relatives which I know of exactly one married couple like that. Maybe some places on the down low allow incest still too. Idk. Bet there are siblings currently acting like a couple. Basically, it started then and it actually won't ever stop but even though it is weird nowadays it isn't necessarily evil so this world will exist on reproduction whether by incest or not.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 2, 2022 19:52:41 GMT
I dated a girl that was 1 of 13 kids... I don't care if you have 30 kids that still doesn't avoid incest which the amount of incest required to get us to today is not possible we could have all died of genetic defects long before making it this far And are genetics show that we definitely didn't come from 2 people . The garden story is in no way literal Adam and Eve weren't brother and sister though. Incest started from their kids and on. People nowadays are still allowed to marry cousins and relatives which I know of exactly one married couple like that. Maybe some places on the down low allow incest still too. Idk. Bet there are siblings currently acting like a couple. Basically, it started then and it actually won't ever stop but even though it is weird nowadays it isn't necessarily evil so this world will exist on reproduction whether by incest or not. In my opinion between Adam and Eve's children there were no incest. Why so? Because incest is a violation of a certain law. Let's say, if I were French in XIX and married on my female cousin, then there would be no incest, because there would be no violation of the law. However, it would be a violation of God's law, because later - in the Moses times - God gave such a law. So, before God's giving the ten commandments (and so on) there were no incest.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Aug 2, 2022 20:29:46 GMT
I dated a girl that was 1 of 13 kids... I don't care if you have 30 kids that still doesn't avoid incest which the amount of incest required to get us to today is not possible we could have all died of genetic defects long before making it this far And are genetics show that we definitely didn't come from 2 people . The garden story is in no way literal Adam and Eve weren't brother and sister though. Incest started from their kids and on. People nowadays are still allowed to marry cousins and relatives which I know of exactly one married couple like that. Maybe some places on the down low allow incest still too. Idk. Bet there are siblings currently acting like a couple. Basically, it started then and it actually won't ever stop but even though it is weird nowadays it isn't necessarily evil so this world will exist on reproduction whether by incest or not. No you don't understand how this works Look it's kinda safe to have a kid with your 3rd maybe 2nd cousin but even then you risk that kid being a little dumb and if you had a baby with your siblings or your parents then the baby would not might but WOULD be messed up both mentally and physically and most likely wouldn't be able to have kids because it would be to jacked up Because the human race literally can't do the momma sister daddy bubba Arkansas thing it's not possible. The concept of everyone coming from just 2 people is a old and outdated religious belief that's debunked up one side and down the other I'm sorry to say.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Aug 2, 2022 20:34:12 GMT
Adam and Eve weren't brother and sister though. Incest started from their kids and on. People nowadays are still allowed to marry cousins and relatives which I know of exactly one married couple like that. Maybe some places on the down low allow incest still too. Idk. Bet there are siblings currently acting like a couple. Basically, it started then and it actually won't ever stop but even though it is weird nowadays it isn't necessarily evil so this world will exist on reproduction whether by incest or not. In my opinion between Adam and Eve's children there were no incest. Why so? Because incest is a violation of a certain law. Let's say, if I were French in XIX and married on my female cousin, then there would be no incest, because there would be no violation of the law. However, it would be a violation of God's law, because later - in the Moses times - God gave such a law. So, before God's giving the ten commandments (and so on) there were no incest. If everyone started from 2 people that means that incest is unavoidable eventually no matter how you play your cards somebody's fucking somebody's Daddy out by the Wood shack it's unavoidable that's just mathematics Besides even the Adam and Eve allegory alludes to there being more than two people because Cain goes down into the valley where he meets his wife and other people which were not mentioned previously this is because the story of Cain and Abel is pieced together from multiple other stories that were eventually squished into one story when the Bible was put together which is why it has conflicting scenarios like that where people aren't mentioned that just show up out of nowhere. But regardless of that this isn't a logical storyline in any way it has a story to be told within it and it's esoteric but this is by no means the beginning of mankind and the world it's cheesecloth to a man needing a cup
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 2, 2022 20:39:17 GMT
Adam and Eve weren't brother and sister though. Incest started from their kids and on. People nowadays are still allowed to marry cousins and relatives which I know of exactly one married couple like that. Maybe some places on the down low allow incest still too. Idk. Bet there are siblings currently acting like a couple. Basically, it started then and it actually won't ever stop but even though it is weird nowadays it isn't necessarily evil so this world will exist on reproduction whether by incest or not. No you don't understand how this works Look it's kinda safe to have a kid with your 3rd maybe 2nd cousin but even then you risk that kid being a little dumb and if you had a baby with your siblings or your parents then the baby would not might but WOULD be messed up both mentally and physically and most likely wouldn't be able to have kids because it would be to jacked up Because the human race literally can't do the momma sister daddy bubba Arkansas thing it's not possible. The concept of everyone coming from just 2 people is a old and outdated religious belief that's debunked up one side and down the other I'm sorry to say. I've heard that these are just rumors. In the history there were many incests indeed. I see nothing special here. Yes, if you marry your own sister (not 2nd, or cousins), etc, then the risk is very high, but about 2nd cousins - isn't so great. Just people talks to decrease chances for people to find true love. I suspect the elder people by that wanted to control the birth, that is why they developed that idiotic principle. If cousins were free to love, I am deadly sure there were less anger and so on. In some cultures in XVII-XIX sex between cousins were practiced to prepare teenagers for the adult life, and as for me it presented world many geniuses.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Aug 4, 2022 13:54:43 GMT
No you don't understand how this works Look it's kinda safe to have a kid with your 3rd maybe 2nd cousin but even then you risk that kid being a little dumb and if you had a baby with your siblings or your parents then the baby would not might but WOULD be messed up both mentally and physically and most likely wouldn't be able to have kids because it would be to jacked up Because the human race literally can't do the momma sister daddy bubba Arkansas thing it's not possible. The concept of everyone coming from just 2 people is a old and outdated religious belief that's debunked up one side and down the other I'm sorry to say. I've heard that these are just rumors. In the history there were many incests indeed. I see nothing special here. Yes, if you marry your own sister (not 2nd, or cousins), etc, then the risk is very high, but about 2nd cousins - isn't so great. Just people talks to decrease chances for people to find true love. I suspect the elder people by that wanted to control the birth, that is why they developed that idiotic principle. If cousins were free to love, I am deadly sure there were less anger and so on. In some cultures in XVII-XIX sex between cousins were practiced to prepare teenagers for the adult life, and as for me it presented world many geniuses. It doesn't exactly work like that . idk who made up that number but basically the absolute minimum amount of people needed for repopulating after factoring in all the different variables like natural disasters, being eaten, random diseases and things of that sort comes out to about 5000 people and maybe the absolute minimum in a perfect world 2500 people In humans in inbred the fertility drops by like half and that's just from 1st or 2nd relation incest and just one time if it's continued past that to another generation then you get things like organs that shut down and sterility and retardation beyond functionality The entire Spanish royal dynasty went extinct because of inbreeding "From 1516 to 1700, nine out of eleven marriages in the Spanish branch of Habsburgs were incestuous. Charles II of Spain (1661–1700), the last male heir of the vast Spanish Empire, was infertile. He could barely speak and had difficulty eating" In various occult belief systems it is almost common knowledge that all the stories in the Bible are merely placeholders that need to be deciphered in order to get the actual message out of them and by no means are recordings of literal history It was a style of writing back in the day a lot like the style Giordano Bruno coined with his impeccable memory it was a way of remembering fast amount of information without forgetting it and also served as a old-fashioned firewall I guess you could put it that way if anybody that's not supposed to read it stumbled upon it and reads it they won't get the actual message out of it and so the actual information stay safe until it reaches the person that it was meant for that has the proper interpretation knowledge but it seems that along the lines this common knowledge became uncommon and a literal interpretation was adopted especially in the West
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 5, 2022 20:19:17 GMT
Adam and Eve weren't brother and sister though. Incest started from their kids and on. People nowadays are still allowed to marry cousins and relatives which I know of exactly one married couple like that. Maybe some places on the down low allow incest still too. Idk. Bet there are siblings currently acting like a couple. Basically, it started then and it actually won't ever stop but even though it is weird nowadays it isn't necessarily evil so this world will exist on reproduction whether by incest or not. No you don't understand how this works Look it's kinda safe to have a kid with your 3rd maybe 2nd cousin but even then you risk that kid being a little dumb and if you had a baby with your siblings or your parents then the baby would not might but WOULD be messed up both mentally and physically and most likely wouldn't be able to have kids because it would be to jacked up Because the human race literally can't do the momma sister daddy bubba Arkansas thing it's not possible. The concept of everyone coming from just 2 people is a old and outdated religious belief that's debunked up one side and down the other I'm sorry to say. Normal families without any incest can have kids like that too. Incest doesn't mean your kids will for sure be messed up. They have the same likely hood of survival as anyone else depending how they were raised. This incest thinf is very possible and real. nypost.com/2022/01/25/worlds-most-inbred-family-includes-four-generations-of-incest/This family could have survived better if they were actually cared for and not neglected. Sure, some were better off than others but they needed to be raised properly. I hope all of them have been taught what they weren't taught and have good jobs now. Their identities are sealed but they could be among us, who knows.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 5, 2022 20:55:38 GMT
Adam and Eve weren't brother and sister though. Incest started from their kids and on. People nowadays are still allowed to marry cousins and relatives which I know of exactly one married couple like that. Maybe some places on the down low allow incest still too. Idk. Bet there are siblings currently acting like a couple. Basically, it started then and it actually won't ever stop but even though it is weird nowadays it isn't necessarily evil so this world will exist on reproduction whether by incest or not. In my opinion between Adam and Eve's children there were no incest. Why so? Because incest is a violation of a certain law. Let's say, if I were French in XIX and married on my female cousin, then there would be no incest, because there would be no violation of the law. However, it would be a violation of God's law, because later - in the Moses times - God gave such a law. So, before God's giving the ten commandments (and so on) there were no incest. Yeah, if it is still allowed by God's law then there is no "incest" and just how families can still begin. Your French example made me think of a movie called Estranged that I watched like a week ago or so. Basically, one girl runaways from home and she vowed to never return or speak of her family. Then one day she was riding on a motorcycle with her boyfriend and they get into an accident. She was left with no memory and was temporarily paralized so couldn't walk and needed help. Her boyfriend suggested that maybe it was time to reach out to her family for help. Since she (January) lost her memory and didn't know any better to say no decided it was a good idea. When they arrived it looked like she is from a weathy family with a butler. Her "family" looked fine and normal but seemed a bit odd as if up to no good or hiding something. They immediately want her boyfriend gone as in out of her life even though they want to be together forever and so on. They tried to pay him tons of money to leave but he refused because she was his future. So there was nothing left to do but remove him another way they thought. When January asked for him they told her he left her never to return again. She didn't believe that and assumed they did something and started her own investigation. Her two "siblings" were giving weird answers when she asked why they weren't married to anyone and why they lived at home. Her "brother" was even being to her. Long story short the movie ended with her being held hostage not to escape again and being pregnant with the guy married to her mom because they needed their royal blood going. :/
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 5, 2022 21:13:04 GMT
I've heard that these are just rumors. In the history there were many incests indeed. I see nothing special here. Yes, if you marry your own sister (not 2nd, or cousins), etc, then the risk is very high, but about 2nd cousins - isn't so great. Just people talks to decrease chances for people to find true love. I suspect the elder people by that wanted to control the birth, that is why they developed that idiotic principle. If cousins were free to love, I am deadly sure there were less anger and so on. In some cultures in XVII-XIX sex between cousins were practiced to prepare teenagers for the adult life, and as for me it presented world many geniuses. It doesn't exactly work like that . idk who made up that number but basically the absolute minimum amount of people needed for repopulating after factoring in all the different variables like natural disasters, being eaten, random diseases and things of that sort comes out to about 5000 people and maybe the absolute minimum in a perfect world 2500 people In humans in inbred the fertility drops by like half and that's just from 1st or 2nd relation incest and just one time if it's continued past that to another generation then you get things like organs that shut down and sterility and retardation beyond functionality The entire Spanish royal dynasty went extinct because of inbreeding "From 1516 to 1700, nine out of eleven marriages in the Spanish branch of Habsburgs were incestuous. Charles II of Spain (1661–1700), the last male heir of the vast Spanish Empire, was infertile. He could barely speak and had difficulty eating" In various occult belief systems it is almost common knowledge that all the stories in the Bible are merely placeholders that need to be deciphered in order to get the actual message out of them and by no means are recordings of literal history It was a style of writing back in the day a lot like the style Giordano Bruno coined with his impeccable memory it was a way of remembering fast amount of information without forgetting it and also served as a old-fashioned firewall I guess you could put it that way if anybody that's not supposed to read it stumbled upon it and reads it they won't get the actual message out of it and so the actual information stay safe until it reaches the person that it was meant for that has the proper interpretation knowledge but it seems that along the lines this common knowledge became uncommon and a literal interpretation was adopted especially in the West These are facts, however these facts are just the maximum of incest involving. I wanted to see things not like that. What I was talking about was primary sex education point and so forth. 2nd brothers and 2nd sisters were closer, and they might have gotten adultery earlier if they would have been able to seeing each other. I guess that only in some extra or special cases marriages between them were necessary. However, I don't remember exactly those data researches, but I do remember I had read some of such articles (they were published not long ago), where it was explained why no cousins marriages were not dangerous. Only the 1st incest is indeed dangerous. But, yes, a chance to have a ill baby in the cousin case is greater, than in non-cousin & non-incest case. I want to ask you, because I didn't understand the last sentences of your comment. What was adopted by the West? And so on? I guess everywhere in the world cousin couples may be found. It's quite natural. Even Romeo & Juliet were cousins.
|
|
Onetrack
Full Member
Posts: 249
Likes: 151
Ethnicity: Caucasian
Country: Canada
Ancestry: Western European
Y-DNA: I-M253
Politics: Center Right
Religion: Free from it
|
Post by Onetrack on Aug 7, 2022 17:02:11 GMT
The problem is that the news is pushing the narrative backwards that it is all about health. This is entirely false as almost all abortions are elective. She took the guy home, stripped down, didn't use birth control of any sort and let multiple Chad's and tyrones nut in her. What did she think was going to happen. Was watching a yt'r today talk about women's exceptionally high body counts... Some in excess of 50! With one bragging she'd had 12 different guys bareback her in a week because if an DNA la des she could just go get it pulled out by forceps. These modern women are absolute trash.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Aug 7, 2022 20:53:38 GMT
Um no it's literally not possible for the human race to come from just 2 people no mammal can withstand that much line breeding can't happen And science is on my side on this one as much as I hate science they at least genetically agree that we didn't all come from 2 people especially not 2 people then again after a flood where 1 family fucked themselves till kingdom cum (pun intended) Not to mention the ark is a symbolic representation of the mind it was not a literal thing because even if you render all the animals in existence now down to basic subgroups which would eliminate about 75% of all the animals you still would have to load so many per minute that it's not possible let alone the food for them and let's not mention the sheer size that the ark would have to be I believe somewhere around 6 or 7 football fields if I'm not mistaken in size However you seen the Bible's description of how big the ark was that would mean that each animal would only have about 0.27cu.ft of space Good luck getting an elephant to fit in a quarter of a cubic foot so to speak which is stretching it anyways so it's just absolutely in no way possible but it is a great story that you'll never forget which is the whole point of it and it's an allegory Two people can have like 20 kids or more. It has been recorded before. Then their kids can have that many too and so on. So very easy to do and people still keep populating to keep the human race going. 2 weeks ago I met a lady who has 13 siblings which to me is too much but hey nothing I can do there but I personally disapprove of too many kids. Are you thinking of big adult animals? Just a tiny baby would do from each gender. So with just 2 baby elephants on board it would be a ton of elephants in the end not just one big one of absolutely no use whatsover unless as dinner or something. One baby elephant is my guess around 25 cubic feet worth of body mass that's not counting it needing a place to lay down or the food it would need to eat that's just standing in place and 25cubic feet is a lot more then 0.25cu.ft Not possible not to mention the fossil record does not show a worldwide flood The story like all the others is not literal it has a hidden message within it's ridiculous storyline which is why it's ridiculous so that you won't forget it.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Aug 7, 2022 20:56:30 GMT
It doesn't exactly work like that . idk who made up that number but basically the absolute minimum amount of people needed for repopulating after factoring in all the different variables like natural disasters, being eaten, random diseases and things of that sort comes out to about 5000 people and maybe the absolute minimum in a perfect world 2500 people In humans in inbred the fertility drops by like half and that's just from 1st or 2nd relation incest and just one time if it's continued past that to another generation then you get things like organs that shut down and sterility and retardation beyond functionality The entire Spanish royal dynasty went extinct because of inbreeding "From 1516 to 1700, nine out of eleven marriages in the Spanish branch of Habsburgs were incestuous. Charles II of Spain (1661–1700), the last male heir of the vast Spanish Empire, was infertile. He could barely speak and had difficulty eating" In various occult belief systems it is almost common knowledge that all the stories in the Bible are merely placeholders that need to be deciphered in order to get the actual message out of them and by no means are recordings of literal history It was a style of writing back in the day a lot like the style Giordano Bruno coined with his impeccable memory it was a way of remembering fast amount of information without forgetting it and also served as a old-fashioned firewall I guess you could put it that way if anybody that's not supposed to read it stumbled upon it and reads it they won't get the actual message out of it and so the actual information stay safe until it reaches the person that it was meant for that has the proper interpretation knowledge but it seems that along the lines this common knowledge became uncommon and a literal interpretation was adopted especially in the West These are facts, however these facts are just the maximum of incest involving. I wanted to see things not like that. What I was talking about was primary sex education point and so forth. 2nd brothers and 2nd sisters were closer, and they might have gotten adultery earlier if they would have been able to seeing each other. I guess that only in some extra or special cases marriages between them were necessary. However, I don't remember exactly those data researches, but I do remember I had read some of such articles (they were published not long ago), where it was explained why no cousins marriages were not dangerous. Only the 1st incest is indeed dangerous. But, yes, a chance to have a ill baby in the cousin case is greater, than in non-cousin & non-incest case. I want to ask you, because I didn't understand the last sentences of your comment. What was adopted by the West? And so on? I guess everywhere in the world cousin couples may be found. It's quite natural. Even Romeo & Juliet were cousins. The problem is every time you re-dip your wick in the same pot so to speak you increase the chances of passing on defects immensely and according to what science says about the human it says that we most certainly did not come from two people because we have genetic diversity meaning we come from thousands of different people because there is enough to keep the gene pool consistently diverse there's no evidence of a bottlenecking down to two people or even close
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Aug 13, 2022 4:34:46 GMT
Two people can have like 20 kids or more. It has been recorded before. Then their kids can have that many too and so on. So very easy to do and people still keep populating to keep the human race going. 2 weeks ago I met a lady who has 13 siblings which to me is too much but hey nothing I can do there but I personally disapprove of too many kids. Are you thinking of big adult animals? Just a tiny baby would do from each gender. So with just 2 baby elephants on board it would be a ton of elephants in the end not just one big one of absolutely no use whatsover unless as dinner or something. One baby elephant is my guess around 25 cubic feet worth of body mass that's not counting it needing a place to lay down or the food it would need to eat that's just standing in place and 25cubic feet is a lot more then 0.25cu.ft Not possible not to mention the fossil record does not show a worldwide flood The story like all the others is not literal it has a hidden message within it's ridiculous storyline which is why it's ridiculous so that you won't forget it. A lot of things have happened from ridiculous things and not everything is as ridiculous as it might seem to one. Yet, a lot of cultures report some kind of flood. Mystefying. Back then no one thought deaf people could ever hear but they can and even the blind might receive sight. A lot is possible. I can even fit at least a dozen baby elephants in my room and they'd have space but I am not into animals luckily so I won't worry about saving them in an apocalyptical situation but the things I do plan to save, you bet I will find a way to or I'd die trying. I even heard of mothers lifting up cars to save their child. Maaan. The supernatural capabilities humans can possess at times is remarkable or the ones that can't feel physical pain at all. There is still a lot to this planet and to what it is capable of that even science doesn't yet know. And you know what? It never will. Because it will always be a step or more behind observing and attempting to learn things and to learn it 100% correctly. So don't get me wrong, I like science, but it isn't all knowing so I prefer math more.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on Aug 13, 2022 7:41:21 GMT
One baby elephant is my guess around 25 cubic feet worth of body mass that's not counting it needing a place to lay down or the food it would need to eat that's just standing in place and 25cubic feet is a lot more then 0.25cu.ft Not possible not to mention the fossil record does not show a worldwide flood The story like all the others is not literal it has a hidden message within it's ridiculous storyline which is why it's ridiculous so that you won't forget it. A lot of things have happened from ridiculous things and not everything is as ridiculous as it might seem to one. Yet, a lot of cultures report some kind of flood. Mystefying. Back then no one thought deaf people could ever hear but they can and even the blind might receive sight. A lot is possible. I can even fit at least a dozen baby elephants in my room and they'd have space but I am not into animals luckily so I won't worry about saving them in an apocalyptical situation but the things I do plan to save, you bet I will find a way to or I'd die trying. I even heard of mothers lifting up cars to save their child. Maaan. The supernatural capabilities humans can possess at times is remarkable or the ones that can't feel physical pain at all. There is still a lot to this planet and to what it is capable of that even science doesn't yet know. And you know what? It never will. Because it will always be a step or more behind observing and attempting to learn things and to learn it 100% correctly. So don't get me wrong, I like science, but it isn't all knowing so I prefer math more. I don't like science and math is the backbone of science because it quantifies everything so you have an odd relationship there. And the Western American modern Christian perspective is the only perspective in the world that takes the Bible in the way that they do every other culture understands that it is an esoteric book and that those are not literal stories. And I don't think you understand what a quarter of a cubic foot is a quarter of a cubic foot is 3 inches by 3 inches all around as in a 3" inch cube that's how much space each animal would have in total that's dividing it up evenly for all animals every single animal would only have a 3-in cubes worth of real estate doesn't matter if it's on the ceiling or the wall or the floor they only get three inches that's not counting food or where they go to the bathroom that doesn't count for any of that It is just the animal species we currently know about and only 1 of them I'm not even counting by the pare so doble that number and you are left with 1.5" cubes each which we are still adding to but being generous I will cut it off at where we know now and I won't assume any extra breeds or species but that leaves you with three square cubes per animal not counting the extra ones for sacrifices or the extra ones for them or even themselves. And yes other cultures mention a flood but like I said language was different back then they were talking about a mental spiritual flood not a literal flood like the Western literal mindset likes to paint everything as. But you're apparently not after accuracy or truth you're after confirming you're cozy narrative which is something I've never been interested in so I guess we'll agree to disagree
|
|