|
Post by joustos on Nov 5, 2021 14:58:12 GMT
Various threads in this section ["History & Ethogenesis"] -- which are quite interesting to me-- have not been exhausted. So, I re-introduce some topics ["Western Man, Western Civilization"] which have been treated elsewhere and for a long time albeit, for me, without any final resolution: I question some of their views or theories. I will be specific, in case some of you are not already familiar with them. To begin with: To speak of Western/Occidental Man or Civilization is to deal with historical men, not with "Man" in the abstract [as an abstract concept]. Secondly, speaking of Occidental or of Oriental Man is to already classify humans according to a "flat Earth" geography which is antiquated in today's Western civilization -- my point being that any theory or conceptualization or discourse reflects moments of human history or, I dare say, moments of human ecology (the world as humans make it or conceive it, for themelves). Thirdly, speaking of historical men [as they are] is not meant to imply that men should be orought to be as they are known/described to be. // To continue
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Dec 15, 2021 0:40:35 GMT
Whites Who Are Born Rich Hate and Fear All Other White PeopleHereditary wealth, business, political power, and cultural manipulation cause the carefully hidden cancer that has destroyed all civilizations. In the formerly United States, unearned and carcinogenic birth privileges reached their final stage of societal destruction during the Vietnam War, when how much money a young man's Daddy had determined whether he would live sheltered and safe or die in a jungle. All the juniorcrat rulers' bought and paid for historians intentionally ignore this key to understanding decline and fall. There is no reason to read these traitors, except to spy on them. The wannabe Preppies who ran away to college, which is an "heiristocratic" institution for non-entitled teenagers who are afraid to grow up, are insignificant followers. So the masses, by design, have no influence on decline. Not even their cowardice, slavishness, and stupidity are their own fault, but created by the pervasive control of Birth-Class Supremacy. This. I don't know, for how long this class division will prevail, and in that also, it's only uber rich, who decides, what's good for others. Do you think they have more or less experience in deciding compared to the others?
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
Posts: 227
Likes: 80
|
Post by lamburk on Dec 15, 2021 4:55:25 GMT
This. I don't know, for how long this class division will prevail, and in that also, it's only uber rich, who decides, what's good for others. Do you think they have more or less experience in deciding compared to the others? Absolutely not. Everyone does the same, the moment they get power.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Dec 15, 2021 5:06:00 GMT
Do you think they have more or less experience in deciding compared to the others? Absolutely not. Everyone does the same, the moment they get power. You mean when they get rich and have power they become corrupt? But yeah I don't think the rich have better decision making skills. I feel they forget how it could be living a life of poverty or whatever because they get lost in their own world.
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
Posts: 227
Likes: 80
|
Post by lamburk on Dec 15, 2021 5:53:36 GMT
Absolutely not. Everyone does the same, the moment they get power. You mean when they get rich and have power they become corrupt? But yeah I don't think the rich have better decision making skills. I feel they forget how it could be living a life of poverty or whatever because they get lost in their own world. Yup, as their minds were abused, and the moment they become rich, they feel emancipated, so they start doing the same thing, which others have done on them.
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Dec 15, 2021 21:57:43 GMT
This. I don't know, for how long this class division will prevail, and in that also, it's only uber rich, who decides, what's good for others. Do you think they have more or less experience in deciding compared to the others? In America, the Longer We Allow Inheritance, the Sooner We Will Fall That's generic, the idea that talent doesn't matter and whoever has the most experience, picked randomly, makes the best decisions. The royalist lie was that the crown prince had been giving orders all his life, so he was fittest to become the next king. Imagine if pro athletes could pass on their positions to their sons. Year by year, play would get worse until finally the leagues would have to be disbanded. That is the true cycle of civilization, not Toynbee's simple-minded analogy to human growth, maturity, and death.
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Dec 15, 2021 22:08:56 GMT
Absolutely not. Everyone does the same, the moment they get power. You mean when they get rich and have power they become corrupt? But yeah I don't think the rich have better decision making skills. I feel they forget how it could be living a life of poverty or whatever because they get lost in their own world. They Are So Nasty That Their Sons Become Commies. Not for "Social Justice," But Just to Get Even With Their Fathers.The HeirDads shame everybody for not toughing it out and becoming rich. Privately though, they regret doing that themselves, which is why they give a lot of money to their sons to make sure their sons don't have to do it on their own. They realize they had become workoholic zombies and had missed out on a lot while they were obsessed with getting rich. But their sons become head cases, knowing perfectly well that they'd be nobodies without Daddy's Money. Yet the reason Daddy was so cold and cruel or an absentee father was that he himself had to compete with HeirHeads positioned in front of him without merit.
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
Posts: 227
Likes: 80
|
Post by lamburk on Dec 16, 2021 13:09:53 GMT
You mean when they get rich and have power they become corrupt? But yeah I don't think the rich have better decision making skills. I feel they forget how it could be living a life of poverty or whatever because they get lost in their own world. They Are So Nasty That Their Sons Become Commies. Not for "Social Justice," But Just to Get Even With Their Fathers.The HeirDads shame everybody for not toughing it out and becoming rich. Privately though, they regret doing that themselves, which is why they give a lot of money to their sons to make sure their sons don't have to do it on their own. They realize they had become workoholic zombies and had missed out on a lot while they were obsessed with getting rich. But their sons become head cases, knowing perfectly well that they'd be nobodies without Daddy's Money. Yet the reason Daddy was so cold and cruel or an absentee father was that he himself had to compete with HeirHeads positioned in front of him without merit. Grandfather generation, they all work hard. Even grandfather will have friends who help each other. Then inter marry between kids of grandfather generation happens. Then the father class start teaching their kids that we are privileged ones and you are heir to our thrones. And the confused progenies think they have all the rights to get all the best thing and these crown prince become arrogant that they start doing social injustice to others. Yes, you are right. These commies and all such stuff are done by such arrogant children as they have no idea how much laws their rich daddies abused anmanipulateto give thecomforts. I have also seen many females with class being arrogant. Of course, they get it from the blood.
|
|