|
Post by fschmidt on Aug 9, 2021 21:32:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Oct 29, 2021 4:37:16 GMT
Great, so you are joining? If yes, you would be the first of the 8 billion worthless members of my species to do so. Two hours for such a ideal phrase? My my, it's a good start for the thousands-year state. Please read Ezekiel 3:16-19. My only obligation is to warn people. I am not a salesman. If you want to follow the herd of humanity to the depths of hell, that is your problem.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 29, 2021 5:40:16 GMT
Two hours for such a ideal phrase? My my, it's a good start for the thousands-year state. Please read Ezekiel 3:16-19. My only obligation is to warn people. I am not a salesman. If you want to follow the herd of humanity to the depths of hell, that is your problem. Good to hear it from not a salesman.
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Oct 29, 2021 17:05:50 GMT
fschmith, I appreciate the idea of an Intentional Ethnicity, and I agree that the Jewish one works, but unfortunately you did not express the value, or the point, of such ethnicity, and I find it repugnant that the acceptance of a religion is a prequisite, a successful means for attaing the wanted ethnicity. (I reject: means are justified by a good end.) You are coherent in excluding -- from an ethnicity under construction -- intelligent people who do not accept a religion, since some of them, and certainly I, would sooner or later become critics of the fictions that characterize religions. I can already imagine a history replay: the preparations of pyres for heretics. (I am interested in truth and reject the idea that I would have to live in a self-imposed athmosphere of fiction, in the Twilight Zone.} // True: Globalism is the enemy of ethnicities, but what is its origin? You know Moses Hess: on the one hand there is Catholicism/Rome, which, depending on the personality of the Messiah/Christ, has failed; on the other, there is Jerusalem/Zionism,whose success will depend on the multitude of Jews in the world, whose mission is to be the priests of mankind. Here comes religion again.A One Religion makes for globalism...No, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Oct 29, 2021 18:07:52 GMT
I find it repugnant that the acceptance of a religion is a prequisite, a successful means for attaing the wanted ethnicity. Acceptance of religion is not a prerequisite, only knowledge of religion is a prerequisite. Empires. Globalism is just empire thinking taken to its logical conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Mar 6, 2022 3:14:22 GMT
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
 
Posts: 222
Likes: 79
|
Post by lamburk on Mar 6, 2022 7:09:00 GMT
I don't want to be a jewish ethnicity. I alreayd have suffered in a nation, created by jews, named India, with many crypto jews, following hinduism, a covert form of zionism, and suppressing entire steppe herder culture.
As long as jews are concerned, they need not worry. Rothschild and co have created a satellite nation, India, which you will come, and loot again. These south asians are pacifists breeds and enjoy doing house keeping works for you people, anyways.
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
 
Posts: 222
Likes: 79
|
Post by lamburk on Mar 6, 2022 7:13:32 GMT
In my most grandiose moments, I imagine doing something like the Puritans did in the Massachusetts bay colony. Finding some piece of land somewhere and creating a shining city upon a hill based on my own Christian conservative values. I always imagine it somewhere in Africa where there is an abundance of land, many poor people to buy it from, and a climate that suits me. Basically do what the Jews did with Israel, create a Christian Zion where persecuted Christians from anti-Christian authoritarian countries and people sick to death of the cancerous values pushed by nearly every country on the face of the planet to escape to. I would also focus on sending missionaries out to the rest of the world to spread the religion. As the Bible says there is neither Jew nor Greek in the kingdom of God and Christians are one holy nation and in biblical times the word nation meant approximately what the word ethnicity means today. I expect that the people of this new country would intermarry and soon become genetically homogenous like many ethnic groups and newcomers to the country would be religiously similar and interbreed with the core group, a happy accident. The Puritans failed in their mission to create their Calvinist utopia due to their connection to the British empire and later the rest of the United States and secularized into the progressive utopians that plague the United States to this day. They succeeded in creating a genetically interrelated group and on a map of how Americans cluster together genetically they are there clear as day in the Northeast, Upper Midwest, Utah, and the West Coast. The Puritans became a genetically distinct ethnic group known in times past as Yankees but they did not retain their Christian values. I think that it is more important to retain the values you want to have in your society than to create a genetically homogenous group. So having an independent state with hard borders and only allowing people who share your values to immigrate and having a media, educational, and cultural system within the state to propagate your values among your people would be more ideal than creating some genetic race. Most Jews on whom you are basing this concept are secular after all and not very Jewish in values. And since you will ask about New England Yankees being a large distinct genetic group to this day I will show you what I mean. Below is a map of settlement patterns in the United States based on groups that settled and created the 13 colonies that later spread west in mutually exclusive bands creating different regional cultures on the North American continent.  And below is a map of how Americans cluster together genetically.  The Northeast and Utah genetic cluster are the descendants of Puritans and later immigrants they intermarried with and genetically assimilated and besides Utah which has kept its Mormon faith (a Yankee cult that originated from the Burnt Over District of New York see link) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burned-over_district they are the most left leaning areas of the country. Your answer lies your in your statement. Whenever, a group fights a battle, using religion, that usually goes down, because, religion is the culture of slaves and workers. The warrior tribes know no culture, no religion,and only massacre. This is where central asian people excel. They only know one thing, kill males, and pick females. However, whites, who already are drugged, by eating genetically modified food, and taking medicines etc, have no such hot blood now. And zionists, with their WASP, the brahmins of europe and america, are wrecking havoc on entire europeans, who have white ethnicity. I guess, only those euros, who have north eurasian ancestry in them,can resist this trader- self proclaimed aristocrat (READ BRAHMIN/BANIYA, which we have in India) hegemony.
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
 
Posts: 222
Likes: 79
|
Post by lamburk on Mar 6, 2022 7:20:13 GMT
I can't believe it's possible for a group of people no matter they intentions are to live separately. Globalization comes with a fierce force and it smashes all the ethnicities. Unfortunately, last glimpses of ethnicities faints in these ashes of the world. Perhaps, there would be some way out, but how to find them if no free good lands are left? Global citizenship is greed in its destruction to spoil every single piece of territory. It is a monster with a non-human face, but it's been feeded by some people.When invasion happens, it's the internal traitor, who allow them to suceed, like here in south asia, many local land lords of bengal region, allowed east india company to loot. Under what pretext? So that their kids can study in oxford and cambridge, and bring preach socialist-marxist culture to the poor people , who were labelled as hindus, by the colonialists. However, there were rebel groups, who were sidelined, and were killed. But then, some of them were fighting to loot resources, and not exactly the war of freedom. I guess, it depends, which group wants what, and eventually, it just goes down. People are people, at the end of the day.
|
|
lamburk
Full Member
 
Posts: 222
Likes: 79
|
Post by lamburk on Mar 6, 2022 7:27:14 GMT
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I assume it's your view that the deterioration of Western culture has happened very quickly. Doesn't that imply cultural rather than genetic causes? It's both. Genetics have been declining since around 1800 due to lack of selection and additionally due to dysgenic feminism since around 1920. Culture has been declining since around 1920. I care about both genetics and culture. My selection criteria should eliminate people with bad culture. Hyper industrialism. Greediness of ruling class, may be, these are the illegitimate descendants of emperor nero. Exploitation of resources of other small nation, which is labelled as third world, backward, because they don't have technology, and also, making sure, there are internal puppets in these nation, who support corrupt regime of globalists. Supporting migrant workers to do the works, and no urban planning. Benefits only for corporates. Selling the finished goods by exploiting cheap labor from these poor nation, and also technology, to the same poor nation. These are the factors for the decline of europe and america. Genetic, a psuedo science, never existed, by any means. I don't think so, that your DNA, RNA decides the way you look and behave, because, blood group remains same, across all the planets.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 6, 2022 8:26:43 GMT
I can't believe it's possible for a group of people no matter they intentions are to live separately. Globalization comes with a fierce force and it smashes all the ethnicities. Unfortunately, last glimpses of ethnicities faints in these ashes of the world. Perhaps, there would be some way out, but how to find them if no free good lands are left? Global citizenship is greed in its destruction to spoil every single piece of territory. It is a monster with a non-human face, but it's been feeded by some people.When invasion happens, it's the internal traitor, who allow them to suceed, like here in south asia, many local land lords of bengal region, allowed east india company to loot. Under what pretext? So that their kids can study in oxford and cambridge, and bring preach socialist-marxist culture to the poor people , who were labelled as hindus, by the colonialists. However, there were rebel groups, who were sidelined, and were killed. But then, some of them were fighting to loot resources, and not exactly the war of freedom. I guess, it depends, which group wants what, and eventually, it just goes down. People are people, at the end of the day. Lamburk, there are no sides in Ukraine today. Maybe only few traitors, but mostly they are Russians. I beg you to watch different news channels. Not all the rpublican ones are trusted since Trump is a Putlet's supporter. www.nytimes.com/2022/03/05/opinion/ukraine-russia-invasion.htmlBut I don't need any news; I am here and as a witness of all this nightmare I can tell you: everyone here is against Russia. There are no russia supporters left.
|
|