Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on Jul 30, 2021 2:05:22 GMT
It's a artificial language made by Zamenhof, a polish man who tries to finish the conflicts of his city by unifying the spoken language, as a ideal.
It's a easy language to learn, few spoken but alive.
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Jul 30, 2021 15:50:23 GMT
It's a artificial language made by Zamenhof, a polish man who tries to finish the conflicts of his city by unifying the spoken language, as a ideal. It's a easy language to learn, few spoken but alive. Many years ago somehow I became interested in a universal language and I got and read some books on Esperanto. After a while I abandoned it for the following reasons: --Its vocabulary is a collection of words from many languages (English, Latin, Greek, German, etc.), so that it appears to be international in nature; however,, I suspected that after a while Esperanto would break up into national dialects and would not be suitable for international communication. -- The vocabulary did not satisfy my ears for composing poems.(I had composed poems in Italian, .... a language which almost composes itself into poems and songs!) [English is one of my learned languages.] --Esperanto has its own grammatical rules or prescriptions, but I preferred the simplicity of English. Furthermore, I suspected the Esp. speakers of various nations would be using the syntax manners of their native nations.
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Jul 30, 2021 19:25:22 GMT
Bimbos to Bilboa
Why not use Basque. It's not related to any European language, so it wouldn't be called "Eurocentric," and it's a living language, so people could go to the Basque Country to brush up on it.
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Jul 31, 2021 15:39:45 GMT
Bimbos to BilboaWhy not use Basque. It's not related to any European language, so it wouldn't be called "Eurocentric," and it's a living language, so people could go to the Basque Country to brush up on it. I think that, because of America' influence, English has practically become an international language, and I am glad for that. Anyway, Basque would be more difficult to learn for many people than either English or Esperanto. Personally I like Basque, but I regret the fact that it does not have grammatical forms for the Nominative and Accusative Cases [like He/Him; Who/Whom]. // Incidentally, contrarily to the common opinion that Basque is an isolate, not an Indo-European language (and hence unrelated to European languages), I found it to be -- "a posteriori" -- one of the oldest I.E. languages, as I am showing empirically in one chapter of my MS on the subject. // Please, hold on: It is an honour for a language or anything else [historiography; art; ...] to be Eurocentric, if we think of Europe before its present socialist/bastardized Europe.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jul 31, 2021 19:13:42 GMT
I prefer language diversification. It is more natural, and it keeps many unshared and uncommond traditions to be preserved and more comfortable at their zones. Usually, a language cannot live long without being changed.
No, unfortunately I'm only heard of it.
|
|