|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jun 10, 2021 18:00:34 GMT
I think one should trust only oneself. (By the way, if one believes in God, and trust to oneself, then there's no nonsense.) What is obvious for the one that is true. (By the reasons of his inner confidence in his perceptions.)
If one can arrange a series of experiments and to derive some conclusions from it, then one can do science by himself.
What does it mean trust to science? - It means to believe those (scientific) articles, conferences, books, etc - all of what someone has said or has written. To believe in all of that isn't the same as to trust it.
That's why making things be acceptable and comprehensive in that sense - to be explicit and to be clear - is the main task of any scientists who want to present his views to his authority. And if one makes his science be unclear, one makes everyone guessing and being perplexed, i.e. wandering within maze of riddles; and nobody trust such mazes (until the riddles are solved).
As they say, trust but verify.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 26, 2021 6:39:33 GMT
I think it's important to note that trusting in science is:
- to trust in some techniques, tools, and materials; - to trust in some societies of scientists.
But instead we must trust to facts.
|
|