Post by Triangle on May 18, 2021 17:19:17 GMT
So, grammar is a virtual entity, or a entity which have no reality out of mind.
Things have colours beyond our capacity of seeing colours. It's possible to a thing to be itself without colour? So colour exists apart from we seeing colours.
The same for the relation of words and grammar in general.
What we can conclude? That the grammatical is an effect of our perception. And it's the only entity which do not have existence beyond mind.
Words have existence beyond mind as concepts, but is a partial existence, between the intuitive and the mindly.
So, we can conclude that grammar is a mental datum, not a natural datum of human existence. But words are part mental, and part natural.
And, the final answer: grammar only growns in understanting by the "errors" of sintax. So is the only science which growns with "errors", or things between the significance of words and the natural origin of words.
Things have colours beyond our capacity of seeing colours. It's possible to a thing to be itself without colour? So colour exists apart from we seeing colours.
The same for the relation of words and grammar in general.
What we can conclude? That the grammatical is an effect of our perception. And it's the only entity which do not have existence beyond mind.
Words have existence beyond mind as concepts, but is a partial existence, between the intuitive and the mindly.
So, we can conclude that grammar is a mental datum, not a natural datum of human existence. But words are part mental, and part natural.
And, the final answer: grammar only growns in understanting by the "errors" of sintax. So is the only science which growns with "errors", or things between the significance of words and the natural origin of words.