|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on May 16, 2021 11:17:19 GMT
Today rock is unpopular. Young timers (zoomers, zeemers, and etc) listen to variety of new rap schools. There are trillions of different styles: each new day brings a dozen of the newer new styles. But in most of that - all of those rap is a crappy shtt: total nonsense, "hip-hopperring", degradation, mumbling, jumbling, etc.
Not surprisingly white people become the object of different stinky accusations. And the same is about the culture. We saw that "Gone With The Wind" and "Uncle Remus Stories...", with many many others were prohibited or even burnt. And also trying to apply the genocide against the whities the rebels wanted to destroy the Andrew Jackson's statue. And we could see many many different animal like behaviour during the last years.
The time for the other cultural things are also there. And rock music isn't the exception. It became rusty and unpopular, while even more or less white school kids stopped copying their daddies, and turn to copy those weird dances and the other really queer, strange, and weird things.
The wave of intentional or non-intentional rejection of the rock music I tied up with white men genocide. If I'm wrong, then what cultural things that belong to white people are popular now? - There are none of such. And the forbidden rock culture is one of the best arguments that my opinion isn't just an opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 5, 2021 9:53:24 GMT
joustosI think I agree with you in that - there are some people who are plotting to destroy any good sense of anything. And they are the ones who do bad things, including using atonality and something other. (By the way, what do you think about syncopes or syncopating in Jazz; this trick are whitespread in there; and what do you think about arrangements in music in general? are they also to be desctructive?) This is an example of those who are about to destroy any good sense:
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Aug 5, 2021 14:55:33 GMT
I agree it's important to go into the sociology of music. My technical treatment was made primarily to show that classical music is not simply a style of music; its constitution (developed by Europeans since the 14th century) is the same as that of Jazz, Rock, (rhythm-and-blues, etc.) All the music by Pink Floyd (Waters et al.) can be easily classified as Classical... The aesthetics of music has a long history, started with the Greeks, and can hardly be discussed without a technical terminology of music, I think.
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Aug 5, 2021 15:19:19 GMT
joustos I think I agree with you in that - there are some people who are plotting to destroy any good sense of anything. And they are the ones who do bad things, including using atonality and something other. (By the way, what do you think about syncopes or syncopating in Jazz; this trick are whitespread in there; and what do you think about arrangements in music in general? are they also to be desctructive?) This is an example of those who are about to destroy any good sense: Only one reply: In principle, I am against arrangements, but I can appreciate their utility. They started in the 19th century when long orchestral works were arranged for piano or some single instrument which well-to-do families had in their house. I like full length productions and, therefore, I hate the radio presentation, or recordings, of only some segment of works. // Some so-called arrangements (as of a piano piece for orchestra) are actually expanded works and can be great -- Cf. Avison; Ravel, etc.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 5, 2021 17:25:05 GMT
I agree it's important to go into the sociology of music. My technical treatment was made primarily to show that classical music is not simply a style of music; its constitution (developed by Europeans since the 14th century) is the same as that of Jazz, Rock, (rhythm-and-blues, etc.) All the music by Pink Floyd (Waters et al.) can be easily classified as Classical... The aesthetics of music has a long history, started with the Greeks, and can hardly be discussed without a technical terminology of music, I think. This research is amazing!!! If you got that result, than I got to agree. I look at the surface here, and didn't wanted to involve so deep.
|
|