|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 28, 2021 1:02:55 GMT
To prove nothing is to prove nothing at all thus no proof exists. The absence of proof for nothing is necessitated by the nature of nothing at including proof as fundamentally nothing. Considering there is no proof for "nothing" nothing cannot be disproven either given an absence of proof for nothing is in itself nothing.
Nothing can neither be proven nor disproven but rather taken axiomatically as this axiomatic nature reflects the same absence of form in which a form impresses itself upon. Axioms are taken on nothing, given no thought is evident behind the axiom for it is strictly taken "as is" without anything behind it. The axiom is rooted in nothing thus nothing is axiomatic.
This axiomatic nature can neither be proven or disproven.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 18, 2021 16:29:51 GMT
I love how you all are explaining the characteristics of something and have named it nothing Potentiality is not a thing as it is an absence of actuality. Potentiality is Void Of Actuality. To Say Void Is Potentiality Is To Say Void Is The Absence Of Actuality. Void is an absence and "absence" is absent of characteristics.
|
|
Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on May 18, 2021 17:06:08 GMT
Nothing is the coordination of time versus space. In that sense, the proof of nothing is the proof of everything. Nothing is void of time and space and as such the voiding of void necessitates being as a result with this being "being" continuous considering the contradiction of void being voided is not subject to time and space. The void is structural.
|
|
Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on May 18, 2021 17:06:37 GMT
Because, if space is the coordination of time, and time the coordination of space, nothing is everything. So, in that sense the proof of one only thing is the proof of nothing. Nothing is a thing. Nothing is not a thing as a thing is something. At best nothing is the potentiality of being. So, nothing is a form.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 18, 2021 18:13:44 GMT
Nothing is not a thing as a thing is something. At best nothing is the potentiality of being. So, nothing is a form. Potentiality is the absence of actuality thus is absent of form.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 18, 2021 18:15:04 GMT
Nothing is void of time and space and as such the voiding of void necessitates being as a result with this being "being" continuous considering the contradiction of void being voided is not subject to time and space. The void is structural. The negation of void, or rather the voiding of void, is structural as nothing negates nothing resulting in being.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on May 21, 2021 4:31:09 GMT
The negation of void, or rather the voiding of void, is structural as nothing negates nothing resulting in being. How did you come to the conclusion it results in being? Because I ran the numbers and it turned out to result to potato. I know potato doesn't sound very logical but neither does saying that Nothing results in being
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 24, 2021 17:06:58 GMT
The negation of void, or rather the voiding of void, is structural as nothing negates nothing resulting in being. How did you come to the conclusion it results in being? Because I ran the numbers and it turned out to result to potato. I know potato doesn't sound very logical but neither does saying that Nothing results in being The negation of negation is a positive. Nothingness is negation.
|
|