|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 28, 2021 1:02:55 GMT
To prove nothing is to prove nothing at all thus no proof exists. The absence of proof for nothing is necessitated by the nature of nothing at including proof as fundamentally nothing. Considering there is no proof for "nothing" nothing cannot be disproven either given an absence of proof for nothing is in itself nothing.
Nothing can neither be proven nor disproven but rather taken axiomatically as this axiomatic nature reflects the same absence of form in which a form impresses itself upon. Axioms are taken on nothing, given no thought is evident behind the axiom for it is strictly taken "as is" without anything behind it. The axiom is rooted in nothing thus nothing is axiomatic.
This axiomatic nature can neither be proven or disproven.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 4, 2021 20:21:51 GMT
Easy everything is Multiplicity no one can find a no-thing no one can find the beginning of a living thing and things like non-duality are Eastern imaginary ideas based on nothing other than the imagination because the only thing that exists is Multiplicity it's physically right in front of your eyes proving itself to you everyday no concept needed. Now you can somehow perverted and say all that proves all is one but that's literally just your neuroses it has no basis in reality As I said before: Nothing cannot be founded (proven) as nothing would be founded (proven). There is no proof of nothing as to prove nothing is to be absent of proof for anything. Dually Nothingness cannot be disproven for the same reason. At best Nothingness is purely axiomatic as it is behind all axioms.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 4, 2021 23:53:23 GMT
The very fact that this computer is working, hinges on the fact that the concept of "zero" is functional. Without it there can be no mathematics or computation. The moment you even attempt any answer to this on your PC, you prove that the concept of nothing (zero) exists. But to say "nothing exists" is an extreme paradox; almost a contradiction, until you appreciate that nothing existing as a concept, is entirely different to it existing in the physical world. (It cannot). Thus we can only resolve this paradox with dualism. The realm of concepts is ontologically separate the the realm of the physical world. Mind is fundamentally separate to body. Zero is the gap between 1's. As a gap it is void. 0 is 1 defining itself through further 1's. 0 is the movement of 1 changing to further 1's. 0 is the multiplicity of 1. In observing 0 1 is observed. Programming is the recursion of 1 into new forms. Nothing can only be observed through being and the multiplicity of being for that matter considering under the multiplicity of being there is no being which exists in itself. To observe this emptiness of being is to observe change thus the mind is connected to the body as one is empty in itself and is directed toward the other. The change of mind into body and body into mind is the connection of mind and body.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on May 5, 2021 5:21:34 GMT
Zero is not nothing zero is something 0 is used as a placeholder and a number 0 is a zero not a blank spot without a circle in it . computers run off of 0 and ones not a empty gap/blank black hole and 1's
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 10, 2021 17:51:43 GMT
Zero is not nothing zero is something 0 is used as a placeholder and a number 0 is a zero not a blank spot without a circle in it . computers run off of 0 and ones not a empty gap/blank black hole and 1's Zero is the absence of 1 existing solely as 1. In simpler terms in observing zero one is observing multiple ones. Zero is the multiplicity of 1 much in the same manner nothing is observed under the multiplicity of being as the gaps or rather absences of said being. The multiplicity of being is necessitated by voids.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on May 10, 2021 20:31:43 GMT
Zero is not nothing zero is something 0 is used as a placeholder and a number 0 is a zero not a blank spot without a circle in it . computers run off of 0 and ones not a empty gap/blank black hole and 1's Zero is the absence of 1 existing solely as 1. In simpler terms in observing zero one is observing multiple ones. Zero is the multiplicity of 1 much in the same manner nothing is observed under the multiplicity of being as the gaps or rather absences of said being. The multiplicity of being is necessitated by voids. I'm talking about the literal number 0
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 11, 2021 0:08:34 GMT
Zero is the absence of 1 existing solely as 1. In simpler terms in observing zero one is observing multiple ones. Zero is the multiplicity of 1 much in the same manner nothing is observed under the multiplicity of being as the gaps or rather absences of said being. The multiplicity of being is necessitated by voids. I'm talking about the literal number 0 And so am I. It is the void of 1 and observes multiple 1's.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on May 11, 2021 7:52:01 GMT
I'm talking about the literal number 0 And so am I. It is the void of 1 and observes multiple 1's. No no it's not. It's even used in a different way than the number one is. It doesn't share the same characteristics it doesn't even share by polar opposite characteristics it has its own unique distinct characteristics when used in mathematics.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 11, 2021 19:38:42 GMT
And so am I. It is the void of 1 and observes multiple 1's. No no it's not. It's even used in a different way than the number one is. It doesn't share the same characteristics it doesn't even share by polar opposite characteristics it has its own unique distinct characteristics when used in mathematics. A number divided by 1 is definite. A number divided by 0 is indefinite. This is polar opposites. A number multiplied by 1 results in said number. A number multiplied by 0 is nothing. This Is Polar Opposite. In coding 0 is the absence of 1 as the void of 1. This void is the gap between 1's thus necessitating multiple 1's. Programming is the repetition of 1 into newer and newer forms.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on May 12, 2021 23:20:24 GMT
No no it's not. It's even used in a different way than the number one is. It doesn't share the same characteristics it doesn't even share by polar opposite characteristics it has its own unique distinct characteristics when used in mathematics. A number divided by 1 is definite. A number divided by 0 is indefinite. This is polar opposites. A number multiplied by 1 results in said number. A number multiplied by 0 is nothing. This Is Polar Opposite. In coding 0 is the absence of 1 as the void of 1. This void is the gap between 1's thus necessitating multiple 1's. Programming is the repetition of 1 into newer and newer forms. In programming 0 is called nothing but just because the programmers have decided to not value the zero and only value the 1 does not fundamentally make it true because at the end of the day there's something where that zero is in fact the simple fact that you know about 0 means it is a something you can take that zero and add it to the end of a row of numbers and guess what the row of numbers has a larger value . And no zero doesn't have a sign on its back saying look I'm actually a one even though I'm not.. but it could be two 1's in the 69 position if you think about it.👅👄💏
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 17, 2021 16:01:00 GMT
A number divided by 1 is definite. A number divided by 0 is indefinite. This is polar opposites. A number multiplied by 1 results in said number. A number multiplied by 0 is nothing. This Is Polar Opposite. In coding 0 is the absence of 1 as the void of 1. This void is the gap between 1's thus necessitating multiple 1's. Programming is the repetition of 1 into newer and newer forms. In programming 0 is called nothing but just because the programmers have decided to not value the zero and only value the 1 does not fundamentally make it true because at the end of the day there's something where that zero is in fact the simple fact that you know about 0 means it is a something you can take that zero and add it to the end of a row of numbers and guess what the row of numbers has a larger value . And no zero doesn't have a sign on its back saying look I'm actually a one even though I'm not.. but it could be two 1's in the 69 position if you think about it.👅👄💏 You Answered It Yourself: In programming 0 is called nothing but just because the programmers have decided to not value the zero and only value the 1Zero is the absence of one and as the absence of one is the gap between ones. It is empty of ones as the void between multiple ones.
|
|
Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on May 17, 2021 17:09:03 GMT
Nothing is the coordination of time versus space. In that sense, the proof of nothing is the proof of everything.
|
|
Triangle
Full Member
Posts: 356
Likes: 134
|
Post by Triangle on May 17, 2021 17:10:41 GMT
Because, if space is the coordination of time, and time the coordination of space, nothing is everything. So, in that sense the proof of one only thing is the proof of nothing. Nothing is a thing.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 17, 2021 23:11:40 GMT
Nothing is the coordination of time versus space. In that sense, the proof of nothing is the proof of everything. Nothing is void of time and space and as such the voiding of void necessitates being as a result with this being "being" continuous considering the contradiction of void being voided is not subject to time and space.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on May 17, 2021 23:12:37 GMT
Because, if space is the coordination of time, and time the coordination of space, nothing is everything. So, in that sense the proof of one only thing is the proof of nothing. Nothing is a thing. Nothing is not a thing as a thing is something. At best nothing is the potentiality of being.
|
|
|
Post by MAYA-EL on May 18, 2021 8:54:38 GMT
I love how you all are explaining the characteristics of something and have named it nothing
|
|