|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Apr 10, 2021 4:19:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by karl on Apr 10, 2021 17:21:23 GMT
Sheeple will always be sheeple. Firefox has its problems, but choosing a Microsoft product instead is like going from ashes to fire.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Apr 10, 2021 19:07:08 GMT
karlI agree with you. Unfortunately, the high I/O usage by Firefox has become one of its biggest issue in the recent years. Google it and you will see dozens of related stuff about it. It's not really good for SSDs and even HDDs in a long term. It seems the optimization of cache feature is not a main concern for the developers of Firefox.
|
|
|
|
Post by karl on Apr 10, 2021 21:58:54 GMT
karl I agree with you. Unfortunately, the high I/O usage by Firefox has become one of its biggest issue in the recent years. Google it and you will see dozens of related stuff about it. It's not really good for SSDs and even HDDs in a long term. It seems the optimization of cache feature is not a main concern for the developers of Firefox.
Are you referring to reducing the longevity of SSDs due to their limited number of writing cycles?
|
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Apr 11, 2021 4:43:06 GMT
karl I agree with you. Unfortunately, the high I/O usage by Firefox has become one of its biggest issue in the recent years. Google it and you will see dozens of related stuff about it. It's not really good for SSDs and even HDDs in a long term. It seems the optimization of cache feature is not a main concern for the developers of Firefox. Are you referring to reducing the longevity of SSDs due to their limited number of writing cycles?
Yes, not only writing but also reading. Imagine a program uses a SSD just like a typical HDD and it won't be good. It's 2020s and software developers should optimize their programs for the technologies like SSD; especially frequently used applications like web browsers. |
|
