|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 24, 2021 8:57:11 GMT
To represent this number you need to use digits 1...9 in this ascendent sequence with plain math operations like +, ×, –, ÷, and degree to write an equal formulation to the number 10 958.
Here are some examples of another numbers ascending sequences:
10 531 = (1+2+3+4)5 + (67–8) × 9
10 882 = (12÷3) + 45 + 6 × 789
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 24, 2021 9:34:18 GMT
I guess all the variations that start from
(1+2+3+4)5 are impossible.
|
|
|
|
Post by joustos on Mar 24, 2021 16:38:49 GMT
To represent this number you need to use digits 1...9 in this ascendent sequence with plain math operations like +, ×, –, ÷, and degree to write an equal formulation to the number 10 958. Here are some examples of another numbers ascending sequences: 10 531 = (1+2+3+4) 5 + (67–8) × 9 10 882 = (12÷3) + 4 5 + 6 × 789 Eugene, why are you becoming a numerologist????????? you know it is nonsense to rewrite "1+2" as 12. Furthermore, you can clearly see that your second line is different in form [in the manner the exponent is used] from the first line. Finally, you must have a sense of humor to compare the last four digits of the two lines. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 25, 2021 6:17:48 GMT
To represent this number you need to use digits 1...9 in this ascendent sequence with plain math operations like +, ×, –, ÷, and degree to write an equal formulation to the number 10 958. Here are some examples of another numbers ascending sequences: 10 531 = (1+2+3+4) 5 + (67–8) × 9 10 882 = (12÷3) + 4 5 + 6 × 789 Eugene, why are you becoming a numerologist????????? you know it is nonsense to rewrite "1+2" as 12. Furthermore, you can clearly see that your second line is different in form [in the manner the exponent is used] from the first line. Finally, you must have a sense of humor to compare the last four digits of the two lines. Cheers.
:):):) Thanks, Joustos for your worries! No, I'm not. This task is really interesting example of math. Yesterday evening I was laying down with high temperature again, and I couldn't even think as usual – I mean that consciousness works worse when a human feels bad. So, I tried to solve some predicate logic examples, but that was terribly hard comparing with this math task. I mean that surprisingly for me I could solve two or three level fractions and degrees, while thinking through logic was painful. You should try this task! There's no numerology. I never believe in numerology. |
|
