|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Nov 30, 2017 16:57:39 GMT
In my opinion, it's OK if 2 persons really love each other and they are capable of managing a mixed family and they are aware of their marriage consequences due to their differences.
|
|
|
Post by Mortimer on Dec 27, 2017 1:43:44 GMT
How did I thumb someone up but not post? Sheesh Ok. So I think people should moreso try to preserve each other but if they love each other to mix then so be it. I won't stand in the way of it but a white spouse and black spouse does look odd with multi colored kids, in my opinion. Also makes me wonder if they are all blood related. So such mixed couples don't have that full "I'm the same" look and families should look like each other. But hey like I said, love is love and in my religion Jesus told us all to love each other. And we have no right telling other people who to date, marry, etc. to me its more weird if they look too similar to eatch other. for example once i was in a bar, and a double date came in and all 4 were blonde and blue eyed and looked like eatch other, and that was very weird for me.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Dec 27, 2017 1:44:09 GMT
You forget that God spoke of spiritual love that can not be confused with the carnal! so you say two person of different races cannot spiritually love eatch other? They can! of course..
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Dec 27, 2017 1:46:28 GMT
The similarity between partners is typical for Europeans! Especially if they feel themselves comfortable they will not care about the opinions of others even close ones!
|
|
|
Post by Mortimer on Dec 27, 2017 1:53:05 GMT
The similarity between partners is typical for Europeans! Especially if they feel themselves comfortable they will not care about the opinions of others even close ones! people who look worlds apart can also feel comfortable and dont care for other opinions. its preference but preference is everything also "asian fewer" but people only accept "similar features" as legit and will say the former is a "fetish" or "unnatural" or "perversion". but both is really the same, you prefer either this or that, there is no difference, and everyone should be allowed to prefer what he/she wants. if a white woman loves black man its just as legit preference as a white woman who loves white men.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Dec 27, 2017 2:03:05 GMT
How did I thumb someone up but not post? Sheesh Ok. So I think people should moreso try to preserve each other but if they love each other to mix then so be it. I won't stand in the way of it but a white spouse and black spouse does look odd with multi colored kids, in my opinion. Also makes me wonder if they are all blood related. So such mixed couples don't have that full "I'm the same" look and families should look like each other. But hey like I said, love is love and in my religion Jesus told us all to love each other. And we have no right telling other people who to date, marry, etc. to me its more weird if they look too similar to eatch other. for example once i was in a bar, and a double date came in and all 4 were blonde and blue eyed and looked like eatch other, and that was very weird for me. Yeah, so that's why we all have different preferences and different people to choose to marry.
|
|
|
Post by AmericanCharm on Dec 27, 2017 2:14:54 GMT
It actually depends how races are defined. Anthropologists define races on the basis of skull and languages. How the society defines it, may be different. Europeans are different, in terms of linguits, compared to Indians, but both are caucasian races. Now, if Indians are taken as a race, which is not in reality, then european and indian getting married would be interracial, but anthropologists won't accept this jury. Where as, a mongloid race getting married to european is inter racial. To me the term white is a political term to define European Caucasians. Indians are not white. Indids and IndoBranchid have Australiod mixed in which non Caucasiod. Indid/IndoBranchid types which make up 20-25% of India are about 70-80% Caucasian and 20-30% Australiod. Melanid types which represent the majority of India at 55% have 40-60% of their ancestry coming from Australiod. Australiod types represent 20% of India meaning they are more Australiod than Caucasian. Most Indians are not Caucasian by proper definition and are certainly not white. An Indian with a European Caucasian is interracial in my opinion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 2:32:17 GMT
It actually depends how races are defined. Anthropologists define races on the basis of skull and languages. How the society defines it, may be different. Europeans are different, in terms of linguits, compared to Indians, but both are caucasian races. Now, if Indians are taken as a race, which is not in reality, then european and indian getting married would be interracial, but anthropologists won't accept this jury. Where as, a mongloid race getting married to european is inter racial. To me the term white is a political term to define European Caucasians. Indians are not white. Indians and IndoBranchid have Australiod mixed in which non Caucasiod. Indid/IndoBranchid types which make up 20-25% of India are about 70-80% Caucasian and 20-30% Australiod. Melanid types which represent the majority of India at 55% have 40-60% of their ancestry coming from Australiod. Australiod types represent 20% of India meaning they are more Australiod than Caucasian. Most Indians are not Caucasian by proper definition and are certainly not white. An Indian with a European Caucasian is interracial in my opinion. I know, indo brachid have lot of australoid ancestry in them. They are not proper caucasoid, that's why are marked as 'Indian'. When I say Indian, I refer to Indo Brachid.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 2:50:52 GMT
Genome Wide study has not been conduted in India full.
It is only after fighting hard with these muffs, that we are able to post topics on ARYAN INVASION in quora.
Earlier, they used to delete such topics also.
|
|
unorigional
New Member
Posts: 32
Likes: 52
Country: USA
Location: Massachusetts
Ancestry: Fr. Canadian, English, Irish, Finnish
Y-DNA: R1b1a1a2a1a2b
mtDNA: H2a2a1
Politics: Increasingly pointless
Relationship Status: In a state of Détente
Hero: Feynman: The smart-ass I wish I could be.
Age: They will only know after they cut me down and count the rings.
|
Post by unorigional on Dec 27, 2017 3:19:17 GMT
I don't know about this "preserve culture" theme. One need only look at a single nation one hundred years ago and you will find the culture was very different. Yes, some things last millennia, but those were the things that withstood countless outside influences anyway. Globalism isn't new. One look at our genome says we have had fluid borders around the globe for thousands of years. If, as a personal stance, you say you prefer your own culture and that is what you are "preserving" for yourself, sure I can understand that. The majority of people in any country are of the same mindset. But I hope most people stating an opposition to these types of marriages are not saying "don't you pollute my culture". So, since it is an opinion thread, my own opinion is "it's none of my business"
|
|
Lakupala
Full Member
Bad times are just times that are bad.
Posts: 179
Likes: 94
Country: USA
Religion: Christian
Relationship Status: Single
Age: 19
|
Post by Lakupala on Dec 27, 2017 6:24:15 GMT
I'm for race preservation so I wouldn't do it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 6:27:48 GMT
My opinion on this is in terms of evolution.
I am not justifying it, but when, we leave our tribes, and migrate, then eventually, this thing is bound to happen.
So this is not in our hands at all!!!
|
|
|
Post by thearistotelliancopt on Jan 4, 2018 22:16:54 GMT
I think race is irrelevant. It doesn't even exist. It is merely a social construct. Beliefs and values are what matter. As long as the woman is a practpracticing stian and share my values then I could care less about race.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 4, 2018 23:37:36 GMT
I think race is irrelevant. It doesn't even exist. It is merely a social construct. Beliefs and values are what matter. As long as the woman is a practocisimg Christian and share my values then I could care less about race. That's true. We're technically all distant relatives of the human race. Good pick for a woman! Those are the best ones.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jan 4, 2018 23:53:34 GMT
I think race is irrelevant. It doesn't even exist. It is merely a social construct. Beliefs and values are what matter. As long as the woman is a practocisimg Christian and share my values then I could care less about race. That's true. We're technically all distant relatives of the human race. Good pick for a woman! Those are the best ones. Yes, but do not forget that until now, among some nations, Christianity is not in high esteem! Although this is already declining even among the traditional Christian nations ...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2018 23:56:05 GMT
I think race is irrelevant. It doesn't even exist. It is merely a social construct. Beliefs and values are what matter. As long as the woman is a practocisimg Christian and share my values then I could care less about race. An open-minded fellow... Watch out or your brain may fall out of your head
|
|