|
Post by greatestiam on Feb 26, 2021 17:18:54 GMT
Would you choose to be a God of dumb animals?
Man plays God with his ants - Brilliant Video : videos (reddit.com)
Humans, to Yahweh, are quite inferior to himself. The term dumb animal might be used.
Our wisdom is more like stupidity to Yahweh, --- is just one of the many verses that show how beneath Yahweh we sit.
We are also quite obtuse, to the point where we are told that the vast majority of us will end in hell and purposeless torture. We just won’t learn.
I would not want to be a god of any dumb animal. Especially if I had to genocide them now and again. They could not see my goodness. Just as I cannot see the goodness in a genocidal god.
Why does Yahweh want to rule over such a species as humankind, --- when he created us to be so low and just worthy of just his godlike disrespect?
Sure, Yahweh says we are above angels, but god hates those for being even more stupid than humans. He even built a hell for them. He even used Noah’s flood to drown his own son’s of god.
I would not choose or desire to lead dumb animals.
Why does Yahweh want to be a leader of dumb animals?
Regards
DL
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Feb 26, 2021 19:39:36 GMT
Firstly, I don't consider humans as animals. With that being said I wouldn't want to be a god of animals since humans technically already are that and it just not even that special especially since I'm scared of most of them . Being a god of humans is a whole different thing. It's actually powerful but being the god of everything is beyong anything.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Feb 28, 2021 23:17:28 GMT
Firstly, I don't consider humans as animals. With that being said I wouldn't want to be a god of animals since humans technically already are that and it just not even that special especially since I'm scared of most of them . Being a god of humans is a whole different thing. It's actually powerful but being the god of everything is beyong anything. I agree that to lower animals, we are nearly as powerful as what we have created in our gods. We do not intentionally use genocide on them the way Yahweh/Jesus do with us. How would you class us if not animals? Vegetable? Mineral? Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Mar 1, 2021 4:30:30 GMT
Firstly, I don't consider humans as animals. With that being said I wouldn't want to be a god of animals since humans technically already are that and it just not even that special especially since I'm scared of most of them . Being a god of humans is a whole different thing. It's actually powerful but being the god of everything is beyong anything. I agree that to lower animals, we are nearly as powerful as what we have created in our gods. We do not intentionally use genocide on them the way Yahweh/Jesus do with us. How would you class us if not animals? Vegetable? Mineral? Regards DL I classify us as just humans. Not animals and not mammals. We are much more capable of things than animals are. We're in this order of existence in terms of power 1. God 2. Angels/demons 3. Humans 4. Animals
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Mar 1, 2021 18:09:22 GMT
I agree that to lower animals, we are nearly as powerful as what we have created in our gods. We do not intentionally use genocide on them the way Yahweh/Jesus do with us. How would you class us if not animals? Vegetable? Mineral? Regards DL I classify us as just humans. Not animals and not mammals. We are much more capable of things than animals are. We're in this order of existence in terms of power 1. God 2. Angels/demons 3. Humans 4. Animals factmyth.com/factoids/humans-are-animals/If you are to make up your own definitions, best to ignore me. Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Mar 1, 2021 20:09:36 GMT
I classify us as just humans. Not animals and not mammals. We are much more capable of things than animals are. We're in this order of existence in terms of power 1. God 2. Angels/demons 3. Humans 4. Animals factmyth.com/factoids/humans-are-animals/If you are to make up your own definitions, best to ignore me. Regards DL Yes, but those are human definitions. I usually take everything that humans claim to know with a grain of salt.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 1, 2021 20:45:11 GMT
I classify us as just humans. Not animals and not mammals. We are much more capable of things than animals are. We're in this order of existence in terms of power 1. God 2. Angels/demons 3. Humans 4. Animals factmyth.com/factoids/humans-are-animals/If you are to make up your own definitions, best to ignore me. Regards DL Elizabeth did the analysis in a clearly correct way. Why should we put ourselves to one and not for the other category? What makes us do it? Even David Hume objected it in his "Human Treatise Tractatus" long ago. A human is a special kind of the nature. We're unlike anything else. To categorize or not to categorize - is another question that matters, but this question is not that one is wrong when doing it. Even with many similar and typical sides and corners of ours /human beings/ we've still got much more other differences comparaly to the other species, and even other things. We've got many similarities with the rest of the nature, take a look: we have the same number of limbs as chairs; we've got the same shape of our heads as the planets have; we've got similar to stones teeth, and many other like this.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Mar 4, 2021 16:05:42 GMT
Yes, but those are human definitions. I usually take everything that humans claim to know with a grain of salt. I can see why. "1. God 2. Angels/demons" You need more salt. Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Mar 4, 2021 16:08:46 GMT
Elizabeth did the analysis in a clearly correct way. It is far from correct to add imaginary entities to a list that is to represent reality. Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Mar 4, 2021 18:03:26 GMT
Elizabeth did the analysis in a clearly correct way. It is far from correct to add imaginary entities to a list that is to represent reality. Regards DL The other thing is science is getting dumber. My eyes are blue and will always be blue and my driver license will forever say that too. Science can stuff their junk about that up their butts. First they said blue eyes aren't blue but clear. Now the latest they said is that blue eyes are brown. Like they're dumb and color blind. It will forever br blue and the dmv and I will ignore their stupidly. They use too much imagination in their "facts" So yeah best to take everything with a grain of salt.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Mar 8, 2021 20:51:07 GMT
It is far from correct to add imaginary entities to a list that is to represent reality. Regards DL The other thing is science is getting dumber. My eyes are blue and will always be blue and my driver license will forever say that too. Science can stuff their junk about that up their butts. First they said blue eyes aren't blue but clear. Now the latest they said is that blue eyes are brown. Like they're dumb and color blind. It will forever br blue and the dmv and I will ignore their stupidly. They use too much imagination in their "facts" So yeah best to take everything with a grain of salt. So morality is not what you care about in religions. You are more concerned with it's view of reality. Is that why Christians adore a genocidal moral monster? Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Mar 8, 2021 22:56:35 GMT
The other thing is science is getting dumber. My eyes are blue and will always be blue and my driver license will forever say that too. Science can stuff their junk about that up their butts. First they said blue eyes aren't blue but clear. Now the latest they said is that blue eyes are brown. Like they're dumb and color blind. It will forever br blue and the dmv and I will ignore their stupidly. They use too much imagination in their "facts" So yeah best to take everything with a grain of salt. So morality is not what you care about in religions. You are more concerned with it's view of reality. Is that why Christians adore a genocidal moral monster? Regards DL What? Think you got confused. I'm all about morality and truth which is why Christianity doesn't want me to listen to lies like that science is currently doing about my eye color as well as them saying humans are animals. Even a child can identify blue but science can't. What a shame.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 10, 2021 9:24:51 GMT
The other thing is science is getting dumber. My eyes are blue and will always be blue and my driver license will forever say that too. Science can stuff their junk about that up their butts. First they said blue eyes aren't blue but clear. Now the latest they said is that blue eyes are brown. Like they're dumb and color blind. It will forever br blue and the dmv and I will ignore their stupidly. They use too much imagination in their "facts" So yeah best to take everything with a grain of salt. So morality is not what you care about in religions. You are more concerned with it's view of reality. Is that why Christians adore a genocidal moral monster? Regards DL Why do you blame Christian being non-moral while 'the morality' is about 'what is good' and 'what is bad', and nobody can say what is good and what is bad for everyone in all the times. Christianity has its view on the things including moral views. So as you as anyone cannot advice a person what one must do everyday or tomorrow to, for instance, fell happy. Christians believe that if you do so and so, you will go heaven. Why to object those if they are just as the same. Look if there were 90% of Christians in Europe, USA or Asia, there would probably occurs inquisitions act and organized Crusades. If there were 90% of Gnostics in Europe, USA or Asia, there would probably were genocide to Christians and genocide to Judaists. If there were 90% of Muslims in Europe, USA or Asia, there would probably were organized death penalties for non-Muslims plus they were allowed to decapitate non-Muslims' /and some Muslims/ heads on the squares elsewhere freely. So, thank God we're not living in times of religion pressure, because usually people become mad when theif faith comes to its edges.
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Mar 10, 2021 20:43:01 GMT
So morality is not what you care about in religions. You are more concerned with it's view of reality. Is that why Christians adore a genocidal moral monster? Regards DL What? Think you got confused. I'm all about morality and truth which is why Christianity doesn't want me to listen to lies like that science is currently doing about my eye color as well as them saying humans are animals. Even a child can identify blue but science can't. What a shame. The shame is Christians not knowing they should be ashamed of their vile genocidal god. How do you, a female, like their misogynous ways? Christians think you are somewhat less than a man. If not of the animal kingdom, what are you? How do you explain how we are so much like all other animal life? Regards DL
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Mar 10, 2021 20:47:41 GMT
So morality is not what you care about in religions. You are more concerned with it's view of reality. Is that why Christians adore a genocidal moral monster? Regards DL Why do you blame Christian being non-moral while 'the morality' is about 'what is good' and 'what is bad', and nobody can say what is good and what is bad for everyone in all the times. Christianity has its view on the things including moral views. So as you as anyone cannot advice a person what one must do everyday or tomorrow to, for instance, fell happy. Christians believe that if you do so and so, you will go heaven. Why to object those if they are just as the same. Look if there were 90% of Christians in Europe, USA or Asia, there would probably occurs inquisitions act and organized Crusades. If there were 90% of Gnostics in Europe, USA or Asia, there would probably were genocide to Christians and genocide to Judaists. If there were 90% of Muslims in Europe, USA or Asia, there would probably were organized death penalties for non-Muslims plus they were allowed to decapitate non-Muslims' /and some Muslims/ heads on the squares elsewhere freely. So, thank God we're not living in times of religion pressure, because usually people become mad when theif faith comes to its edges. Morals are about good and evil for sure, and Christians are calling evil good. Do you want to try to show when genocide is good or that a god who kills when he can cure is also somehow good? Care to argue for the good of Christian homophobia and misogyny? I did not think so. Stop trying to help Satan. Regards DL
|
|