Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 3, 2020 14:39:09 GMT
Postmodernism had claimed that there would be no more metanarratives (no great story for anyone, and great events); no more history (the history had been ended with USSR fall down); no more novels issues (no more classic genres of literature); no more creativity: all the ideas were wasted and post-creativity is to be just create whatever you had in mind; no more religion: religion must be transformed into such a class of broken superstition pieces; and no more seriousness, so everyone would be laughing and smiling all the time with no real reason.
Not a secret many of French poststructuralists as Foucault, Baudrillard, Delouse were associated with people who had influenced on postmodernism, and they (not only French philosophers) were more or less communists, or those who support the left ideas. Foucault said it openly, but the rest of philosophers did it episodically. Not only the poststructuralists, but such philosophers as Richard Rorty, Hillary Putnam, and Rober Nozick. There were many others, yet they all can be group together as partially the leftism ideologists.
Now we aitn't see all those facts what postmodernism had been trying to agrue. There are many reasons to not nod to their predictions. Moreover, about what predictions from the postmodernism we can talk about if there are no metanarratives or history?! Such attacks from the leftists were not a surprise; it's easy to have seen how close all those slogans and speeches were too anti-right movement that has been started earlier on the wave against the fascism. New leftists were tried to destroy all the good of what conservatives had previously done, and they just roughly associated the ideals of conservatives with the fascistic ideals, so in sum they were about to curse anything that was close to conservative ideals.
It was losers rhetoric, nothing more.
What is pretty obviously now is that the post-modernistic views and its wishes has been failed. Some of their ideals of the creativity which we can be majorly seen, exemplified, on many modern stupid untalented artists and singers. So what's the question left? - What about the leftism now? Probably it must have been died already with all those postmodernistic views. If all what they wrote and claimed was gibberish, so such a gibberish is about them - the leftists. No postmodern - no leftism. They cannot say anything new; they have already signed about it. So trustworthy is left for the lefts. Their last chance to say something useful had been vanished with their already dead inspirations.
An Interesting Source
Not a secret many of French poststructuralists as Foucault, Baudrillard, Delouse were associated with people who had influenced on postmodernism, and they (not only French philosophers) were more or less communists, or those who support the left ideas. Foucault said it openly, but the rest of philosophers did it episodically. Not only the poststructuralists, but such philosophers as Richard Rorty, Hillary Putnam, and Rober Nozick. There were many others, yet they all can be group together as partially the leftism ideologists.
Now we aitn't see all those facts what postmodernism had been trying to agrue. There are many reasons to not nod to their predictions. Moreover, about what predictions from the postmodernism we can talk about if there are no metanarratives or history?! Such attacks from the leftists were not a surprise; it's easy to have seen how close all those slogans and speeches were too anti-right movement that has been started earlier on the wave against the fascism. New leftists were tried to destroy all the good of what conservatives had previously done, and they just roughly associated the ideals of conservatives with the fascistic ideals, so in sum they were about to curse anything that was close to conservative ideals.
It was losers rhetoric, nothing more.
What is pretty obviously now is that the post-modernistic views and its wishes has been failed. Some of their ideals of the creativity which we can be majorly seen, exemplified, on many modern stupid untalented artists and singers. So what's the question left? - What about the leftism now? Probably it must have been died already with all those postmodernistic views. If all what they wrote and claimed was gibberish, so such a gibberish is about them - the leftists. No postmodern - no leftism. They cannot say anything new; they have already signed about it. So trustworthy is left for the lefts. Their last chance to say something useful had been vanished with their already dead inspirations.
An Interesting Source