Post by filmocracy on Aug 7, 2020 17:14:25 GMT
There is a kind of diference in acting and doing. To act is to create, by a inovation or a invention. But to do something is just construct some idea in a consciouness or some object in reality.
I believe that is the key of Epictetus problem of things that we control and things we do not control. To act is to control, and we only predict something only if we act in some situation. To predict is to control, and to control is to act.
Example: construct a house and inovating in some house structure or form, aesthetical form. And inventing a computer, inovating in some hd problem, or part, and to construct a computer.
To act, according Mario Ferreira dos Santos, a brazilian philosopher, includes always a element of novelty.
The symbol of scintillia animae, soul "spark" in Jung psychology (Mysterium Coniunctionis) is very interesting and we can understand better the true reality of acting in the world, to generate new things and better things.
I believe that is the key of Epictetus problem of things that we control and things we do not control. To act is to control, and we only predict something only if we act in some situation. To predict is to control, and to control is to act.
Example: construct a house and inovating in some house structure or form, aesthetical form. And inventing a computer, inovating in some hd problem, or part, and to construct a computer.
To act, according Mario Ferreira dos Santos, a brazilian philosopher, includes always a element of novelty.
The symbol of scintillia animae, soul "spark" in Jung psychology (Mysterium Coniunctionis) is very interesting and we can understand better the true reality of acting in the world, to generate new things and better things.
