|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jun 30, 2020 3:10:34 GMT
The continual change, as the diverging of one category into another, necessitates a finite number approaching infinity. This finite number is always changing through a regress to infinity, ie infinite regress, considering the change itself is unending. Infinite, never ending change, results in an infinite regress.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Jul 3, 2020 15:59:15 GMT
Infinity is observed through the continual now where each phenomenon, as composed of further phenomenon, continually diverges/converges to new phenomena. This regress is a process of ever diverging and converging phenomena.
Finiteness is multiple infinities. Take for example a line. It is infinite as composed of further lines. Each halving of the line results in a new line which is infinite thus resulting in multiple infinities.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Aug 15, 2020 10:00:47 GMT
That's for certain.
If smth, let call this A, has to be changed infinitely, but we need to be sure that this process of changing is not a fake, but a true process, that A need to have an infinitely changing deities that change this A to smth else each new time.
It looks like time itself.
Btw, Nietzsche's thought on this was that everything must be repeated endlessly numerous of times, and if he (Nietzsche) had been a lunatic once upon a time, he would be the one in every sequence.
But, taking your theory (I hope I catch the point correctly (there would be no such repeats, and Nietzsche shouldn't be worry about it.
|
|
