Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 3, 2020 20:01:20 GMT
The grounding of all arguments is founded in the premise. The premise however has no formal system in determining its introduction other than the assertion by the observer.
The premise is subject to the angle of the observer. This angle of the observer is the formalism itself in determining which phenomena act as a premise and which do not.
As a formalism, the angle of the observer has a thetical and antithetical element. The thetical is that which is observed through the observer. The antithetical is that which is not observed through the observer.
Premises are thus determined by a dualism between what is observed and what is not observed. This dualism forms the angle of observation itself where what is observed is a series of continuums which intersect at the point of non observation. It is the series of continuums which form observation itself and the absence of continuums which reflect an absense of observation.
All arguments, as subject to the angle of the observer, are thus grounded in continuums with these continuums acting as the premise. Considering the premise of an argument has no set formalisms in determining what acts as the premise and what does not, the formalism of the premise is always a continuum. Formalism is continuity of the premise from one state into another however there is no formalism in determining which premise one begins with other than continuum itself. In these respects all premises, as subject to the point of the observer, are random in respect to subject, but formalized as continuums.
The premise is subject to the angle of the observer. This angle of the observer is the formalism itself in determining which phenomena act as a premise and which do not.
As a formalism, the angle of the observer has a thetical and antithetical element. The thetical is that which is observed through the observer. The antithetical is that which is not observed through the observer.
Premises are thus determined by a dualism between what is observed and what is not observed. This dualism forms the angle of observation itself where what is observed is a series of continuums which intersect at the point of non observation. It is the series of continuums which form observation itself and the absence of continuums which reflect an absense of observation.
All arguments, as subject to the angle of the observer, are thus grounded in continuums with these continuums acting as the premise. Considering the premise of an argument has no set formalisms in determining what acts as the premise and what does not, the formalism of the premise is always a continuum. Formalism is continuity of the premise from one state into another however there is no formalism in determining which premise one begins with other than continuum itself. In these respects all premises, as subject to the point of the observer, are random in respect to subject, but formalized as continuums.