|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 2, 2020 20:04:17 GMT
The general state of contexts, as being simultaneously true and false given another context, necessitate proof in alignment of contexts alone where falsifiability is not necessarily the primary determinate of truth.
All contexts are true, as existing, and the alignment with other contexts necessitates this truth value as grounded in degrees of interpretation given the very nature of existence itself is a premeditated truth value that underlies all contexts.
Falsifiability thus lends itself to a manifestation of degrees along a continuum, where all contexts as continuums derive truth value from alignment with further continuums.
What we deem as false is a misalignment between contexts, yet this misalignment necessitates each context is self referentially true by the fact they are degrees of existence. It is in manifestation of degrees, where each context as a continuum is part of another context as a continuum, that necessitates existence as a relation of parts which form a whole.
This whole is the summation of interlinked parts with this interlocking of truths determining which have truth value and which do not. Truth is thus premised in the connection between contexts with any absence of connection, as an absence of symmetry between parts, being the sole determinate of what we deem as falsifiable.
In shorter terms, falsifiability is an absence of connection between contexts as an absence of symmetry. Symmetry acts as the sole unifier by reflecting certain common bonds which exist across contexts. Symmetry is a connection across contexts as a superpositioned context that exists in multiple contexts at the same time.
|
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Apr 3, 2020 18:13:18 GMT
The general state of contexts, as being simultaneously true and false given another context, necessitate proof in alignment of contexts alone where falsifiability is not necessarily the primary determinate of truth. All contexts are true, as existing, and the alignment with other contexts necessitates this truth value as grounded in degrees of interpretation given the very nature of existence itself is a premeditated truth value that underlies all contexts. Falsifiability thus lends itself to a manifestation of degrees along a continuum, where all contexts as continuums derive truth value from alignment with further continuums. What we deem as false is a misalignment between contexts, yet this misalignment necessitates each context is self referentially true by the fact they are degrees of existence. It is in manifestation of degrees, where each context as a continuum is part of another context as a continuum, that necessitates existence as a relation of parts which form a whole. This whole is the summation of interlinked parts with this interlocking of truths determining which have truth value and which do not. Truth is thus premised in the connection between contexts with any absence of connection, as an absence of symmetry between parts, being the sole determinate of what we deem as falsifiable. In shorter terms, falsifiability is an absence of connection between contexts as an absence of symmetry. Symmetry acts as the sole unifier by reflecting certain common bonds which exist across contexts. Symmetry is a connection across contexts as a superpositioned context that exists in multiple contexts at the same time. The fact that you refuse to give specific examples tells us that you are running away from reality into the comforting and angelic-seeming but non-existent halo of theory. Here's the type of example that would release you from the irrationally unreal. In praising development of natural resources, I started out writing that it gives us "high-paying jobs and cheap products." But even in a laudatory context, "cheap" sounds like "junk." So it should be replaced with "inexpensive." This proves that a specific and present context may not be enough to overcome the effect of a word's most frequently used context. |
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 3, 2020 20:18:35 GMT
The general state of contexts, as being simultaneously true and false given another context, necessitate proof in alignment of contexts alone where falsifiability is not necessarily the primary determinate of truth. All contexts are true, as existing, and the alignment with other contexts necessitates this truth value as grounded in degrees of interpretation given the very nature of existence itself is a premeditated truth value that underlies all contexts. Falsifiability thus lends itself to a manifestation of degrees along a continuum, where all contexts as continuums derive truth value from alignment with further continuums. What we deem as false is a misalignment between contexts, yet this misalignment necessitates each context is self referentially true by the fact they are degrees of existence. It is in manifestation of degrees, where each context as a continuum is part of another context as a continuum, that necessitates existence as a relation of parts which form a whole. This whole is the summation of interlinked parts with this interlocking of truths determining which have truth value and which do not. Truth is thus premised in the connection between contexts with any absence of connection, as an absence of symmetry between parts, being the sole determinate of what we deem as falsifiable. In shorter terms, falsifiability is an absence of connection between contexts as an absence of symmetry. Symmetry acts as the sole unifier by reflecting certain common bonds which exist across contexts. Symmetry is a connection across contexts as a superpositioned context that exists in multiple contexts at the same time. The fact that you refuse to give specific examples tells us that you are running away from reality into the comforting and angelic-seeming but non-existent halo of theory. Here's the type of example that would release you from the irrationally unreal. In praising development of natural resources, I started out writing that it gives us "high-paying jobs and cheap products." But even in a laudatory context, "cheap" sounds like "junk." So it should be replaced with "inexpensive." This proves that a specific and present context may not be enough to overcome the effect of a word's most frequently used context. Truth and False values were argued, not descriptive properties. Your point is out of context, thus false. It is true as "cheap" or "inexpensive". "Junk" is "inexpensive" as well.
However to use your argument, descriptive properties do change according to the context presented, which just backs up my point further.A unicorn exists = T/F A unicorn exists as a dream = T A unicorn exists as an empirical biological entity = F "A unicorn exists" can always be either justified or falsified dependent upon the context it is represented through. "A unicorn exists" is true when it reflects under the context of "dream". Both the "unicorn" and the "dream" share a symmetry through "imagination" which acts as an underlying context both "unicorn" and "dream" exist through. Imagination is A Superpositioned Context. Both the "unicorn" and the "biological entity" have an absence of symmetry through the context of "empiricality" which is a context that does not underlie both "unicorn" and "biological entity" but only "biological entity". "Empiricality" is underlying context which "unicorn" and "biological entity" do not share, thus an absence of symmetry as an absence of shared context is observed. Unicorns Are Not Empirical. Truth And Falsifiability Change According To The Context Presented, Thus "A Unicorn Exists" Is Both True And False. |
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Apr 6, 2020 16:38:59 GMT
The Twinkling Void
A unicorn existing in a false context is a contradiction. It cannot exist where nothing exists; don't go there. But the mind has a weakness for movie presentations, the modern version of frightening or seductive sermons. People believe in space travel because they see it on film. The only reason they don't believe in movie vampires is that they've been pre-conditioned to rejection them. But the ruling class benefits from Trekkie escapism, so the natural gullibility of the mind is encouraged. I've even been told by a NA$A parasite that if High IQs didn't have this mind candy to munch on, they might be dangerous to the self-appointed authorities.
Academia is a false context, mind-raping of escapists who are afraid to grow up and therefore the childishly look on professors as infallible father figures.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 6, 2020 17:57:42 GMT
The Twinkling VoidA unicorn existing in a false context is a contradiction. It cannot exist where nothing exists; don't go there. But the mind has a weakness for movie presentations, the modern version of frightening or seductive sermons. People believe in space travel because they see it on film. The only reason they don't believe in movie vampires is that they've been pre-conditioned to rejection them. But the ruling class benefits from Trekkie escapism, so the natural gullibility of the mind is encouraged. I've even been told by a NA$A parasite that if High IQs didn't have this mind candy to munch on, they might be dangerous to the self-appointed authorities. Academia is a false context, mind-raping of escapists who are afraid to grow up and therefore the childishly look on professors as infallible father figures. I agree to the above. A unicorn existing in a false context is a contradiction as it leads to falsity. It seems we agree, so what is the issue? |
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Apr 7, 2020 17:38:47 GMT
Consistently Chameleon
Your floating usage of terms is the issue. Words are tools, not weapons or toys. Mental masturbation is sterile, just like your education.
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 7, 2020 21:45:36 GMT
Consistently ChameleonYour floating usage of terms is the issue. Words are tools, not weapons or toys. Mental masturbation is sterile, just like your education. Can't be mental masturbation if we agree. Context determines truth and descriptive value thus the relationship between one word and another necessitates meaning as use. |
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Apr 8, 2020 16:41:23 GMT
Unpaid College Education Is a Fraud and Should Not Be Rewarded
Do you know the real meaning of oxymoron? I'm not referring to the ignorant contemporary meaning pushed by conceited media clowns who sucked their thumbs in college, who think "a contradiction in terms" is too hard to enunciate. The meaning of the few intelligent people we are allowed to listen to is just the opposite; for example, "boneless ribs" is a contradiction if taken literally. An oxymoron is actually a clever phrase similar to a pun or paradox.
So here we have a meaning that is not reached through context, but from the word "ribs" itself. It is being used for "rib meat."
|
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Apr 8, 2020 20:37:50 GMT
Unpaid College Education Is a Fraud and Should Not Be RewardedDo you know the real meaning of oxymoron? I'm not referring to the ignorant contemporary meaning pushed by conceited media clowns who sucked their thumbs in college, who think "a contradiction in terms" is too hard to enunciate. The meaning of the few intelligent people we are allowed to listen to is just the opposite; for example, "boneless ribs" is a contradiction if taken literally. An oxymoron is actually a clever phrase similar to a pun or paradox. So here we have a meaning that is not reached through context, but from the word "ribs" itself. It is being used for "rib meat." "Boneless ribs" are "rib meat"...no contradiction is here as "rib" exists through multiple definitions as determined by the context through which it is presented. One context determines another in both definition and truth value. |
|
