|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 30, 2020 19:07:36 GMT
All assertions infinitely regress to a series of common assertions, thus necessitate all assertions having an inherent middle term. Each middle term in itself is a regress thus necessitating all middle terms as a series of underlying assertions which multiple phenomena have in common.
(Toaster --> Metal --> Copper --> Electrons) (Cow ---> Bone ---> Minerals ---> Copper ---> Electrons)
___________Copper --> Electrons___________ ((...) ---> Toaster --> Metal ---> (....)) ((....) ---> Cow ---> Bone ---> Minerals ---> (...))
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Mar 30, 2020 22:09:52 GMT
Materialist physics falsely postulates this as regards life-forms.
But any life form has an organising principle inexplicable by real physics. We just have to look at how life-forms mostly rise up against gravity, against entropy, against their own destruction with willing intent.
Sure, the assumption of materialist physics is that 'genes' do this, and there is much complexity hidden in their arguments. But if they truly understood genes, they would be immortal, but they are not. At least their bodies are not.
But the spirit will give up its earthly position for higher ideals. Still, a bunch of atoms has no reason to heal itself, to strive beyond itself, to protect itself and its interests or its ideals.
One mind can cause a nuclear explosion.
The way in which we mindfully seek physical wholeness, and spiritual transcendence is intricately connected to how we use those electrons to our purpose in this regard.
Even when we build a toaster, the electrons in that toaster are organised on the level of our perspective, for whatever shape WE desire. So it is consciousness that shapes the electrons.
Of course the materialist assumption is that the electrons shape our consciousness. But the decision to make a toaster has no form whatsoever on the scale of electrons.
Be careful not to attribute false power to the invisible and mystical world of physics.
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is an oxymoron. It is the lack of principle that he noted. Nothing more. Is that lack of noticeable principle really hiding how consciousness moulds the electrons to move via your central nervous system?
How can it be anything else?
|
|