|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 18, 2020 22:21:45 GMT
The analysis of a phenomenon is the breaking down of the phenomenon into different parts. Each set of parts is a variation of the original part from which it is broken down.
One phenomenon changes into another phenomenon until a series of interconnected phenomenon occur.
This series of phenomenon, in itself, is a string due to linear progression.
This string, is a phenomenon as well, thus resulting in the variables which compose the string as a variable in itself.
One variable changes into a series of variables which in turn again act as a variable:
A (A --> B) (A --> B) = A1
This new variable follows the same form, as the original variable, and changes into another variable string:
A1 (A1 --> A2)
With this new variable string acting as a variable in itself and following the same nature:
(A1 --> A2) = A1a
A1a (A1a --> A1b) (A1a --> A1b) = A1aa
Thus for every act of string creation, through analysis, a new sub string occurs as a result until eventually the string is composed of an infinite number of strings. This summation of strings always result in a series of strings beyond the original with its summation occuring under one variable. In simpler terms a variable breaks down into a string, then another string, until due to a finite capacity to measure, it is all summate under a single variable again.
One variable breaks down to many and the many exist under one. This in itself becomes a string:
(A --> A1aa)
Or a new variable:
AA1
depending on the degree to which analysis is stopped. Analysis, as string creation, is then subject to the observer's choice resulting in knowledge always having an inherent element of randomness.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 23, 2020 20:37:04 GMT
any series of phenomena is not neither strings, nor lines. (It might be a progression though.)
One phenomena does not exist. Any phenomena exist as a series of phenomena. So,
There is no A and B.
As soon as there is no pattern a, a->b, (a->b)-a1, there is no a1, a1->a1b,...
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 23, 2020 22:15:07 GMT
any series of phenomena is not neither strings, nor lines. (It might be a progression though.) A series of phenomena is a string.One phenomena does not exist. Any phenomena exist as a series of phenomena. So, One phenomena exists through many phenomena. A string of variables, (A --> B --> C), exists as a singular variable (A --> B --> C) = AaThere is no A and B. As soon as there is no pattern a, a->b, (a->b)-a1, there is no a1, a1->a1b,... All strings of variables are in themselves variables, thus a variable is both one and many.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 23, 2020 22:37:40 GMT
any series of phenomena is not neither strings, nor lines. (It might be a progression though.) A series of phenomena is a string. - A circle then. There's no link between them. The relation between them has been built by imagination only, so not obvious.One phenomena does not exist. Any phenomena exist as a series of phenomena. So, One phenomena exists through many phenomena. A string of variables, (A --> B --> C), exists as a singular variable (A --> B --> C) = Aa - Actually, a variable is a gap that is taken because of economy. We have to write "__ is white" assuming "__" must be filled. A form of that "__ is white" means something is missing, or it has poor form. Or, compare to this: "■■2 = 4". To recover it we have to write "2" and "+" to finish the form.
That's why variables don't exist one through another.
One phenomena exist ___ many phenomena, but it doesn't mean it exists "through" them. I may exist as it likes to.There is no A and B. As soon as there is no pattern a, a->b, (a->b)-a1, there is no a1, a1->a1b,... All strings of variables are in themselves variables, thus a variable is both one and many.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Mar 23, 2020 22:46:04 GMT
1. A circle unfurled into a length is a string: (A --> B --> C --> A --> B ---> C ---> ....) = (A --> B --> C) 2. A + 2 = 3 A = B + C as (3 + -2)
|
|