|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 11, 2020 21:28:43 GMT
What's the worst traditions (perhaps national, or cultural) do you know? If such traditions are alive, should they be removed?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2020 9:55:05 GMT
What's the worst traditions (perhaps national, or cultural) do you know? If such traditions are alive, should they be removed? After an HeirHead Meets His Guillotine, There Will be Only Air Where His Head Used to BeBirth privileges are the death of a nation. The children of the rich should be cut off at age 18: no allowance or paid-up tuition in college, no trust funds, no inheritance. Leftover wealth must go back to the public, which provided it. The plutocrats who earned it act like they did it all on their own. But if they believe so strongly that they can pass it on to their mooching sons, they themselves must have also gotten it through luck or cheating. And all the Socialist leaders have been richkids, so don't give me this Lefty/Righty nonsense. Ideology is a spitball fight at a prep school, which also must be abolished. Heirs are the enemy of human progress; they block our road forward and must be pushed into the gutter. Because they control what we think, they will continue to spread like cancer; so the rest of us will be the ones who wind up in the gutter. If productive people are to have a future, we better wake up to this greatest evil and outlaw it. Those who accept it are childish economic cowards who hate their own fathers for not getting rich and spoiling them. A wannabe Preppie has no right to call himself an American. The motto of a real man is, "If we have to do it on our own, so must the sons of the rich." Imagine some team owner who himself had inherited the team. What if he was so sure he had a right to it (imaginary, all these tyrants know they are playing the rest of us for suckers) that he tells his players that they, too, can pass on their positions to their sons. Soon that team would wind up in last place year after year and have to be disbanded. So will we. You really expect that these rich spoiled brats, whose father made money by extracting wealth at the labor of others, would even relinquish the control? They use this CORRUPT SYSTEM for their own benefits, by influencing the government, systems, and such other things. I really don't know why people just sell their MORALITY for some MATERIAL BENEFITS AND COMFORTS,which never LASTS LONG.
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Mar 14, 2020 17:02:26 GMT
After an HeirHead Meets His Guillotine, There Will be Only Air Where His Head Used to BeBirth privileges are the death of a nation. The children of the rich should be cut off at age 18: no allowance or paid-up tuition in college, no trust funds, no inheritance. Leftover wealth must go back to the public, which provided it. Heirs are the enemy of human progress; they block our road forward and must be pushed into the gutter. Because they control what we think, they will continue to spread like cancer; so the rest of us will be the ones who wind up in the gutter, so we better wake up to this greatest evil and outlaw it. Those who accept it are childish economic cowards who hate their own fathers for not getting rich and spoiling them. A wannabe Preppie has no right to call himself an American. The motto of a real man is, "If we have to do it on our own, so must the sons of the rich." Imagine some team owner who himself had inherited the team. What if he was so sure he had a right to it (imaginary, all these tyrants know they are playing the rest of us for suckers) that he tells his players that they, too, can pass on their positions to their sons. Soon that team would wind up in last place year after year and have to be disbanded. So will we. Surely, if kids had lived in communism, while grown-ups would live in liberalism. Earmarks, tauros, brands - is what kills any fairness. Unfortunately, it seems that it's really hard to imply this. How to organize it? Richs are ones who eat and eat, and eat again. They would swallow up the lands, then giving up. To cut 'em down is to diminish their hungriness. Their hungriness is a common disaster, a horrible plague. Getting rid of that means - to cut off their gluttony, but how to? We don't know the key pass to their empty vaults? All I can say that their greed is similar to quicksands and deserts. What kind of vast emptiness do their hungriness have? Allowing the Dead to Pass on Anything Is NecrocracyIt can be stopped by bypassing the rich, who may deserve their present situation, and taking away their unearned afterlife by downgrading their sons. It is misleading the way these ruling classes are attacked, as having abused their power rather than not having earned any power at all if it is inherited. What kind of competition puts the sons of previous winners ahead of the starting line by the same space their fathers finished? And you're also wrong in thinking they want to take anything of ours; they want to prevent us from having anything in the first place. The Right Wing of this vulture says, "I got mine; I'm not going to let you have yours." Its mirror-image Left Wing says, "I've got mine; I'm going to give yours away."
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Mar 14, 2020 17:22:11 GMT
After an HeirHead Meets His Guillotine, There Will be Only Air Where His Head Used to BeBirth privileges are the death of a nation. The children of the rich should be cut off at age 18: no allowance or paid-up tuition in college, no trust funds, no inheritance. Leftover wealth must go back to the public, which provided it. The plutocrats who earned it act like they did it all on their own. But if they believe so strongly that they can pass it on to their mooching sons, they themselves must have also gotten it through luck or cheating. And all the Socialist leaders have been richkids, so don't give me this Lefty/Righty nonsense. Ideology is a spitball fight at a prep school, which also must be abolished. Heirs are the enemy of human progress; they block our road forward and must be pushed into the gutter. Because they control what we think, they will continue to spread like cancer; so the rest of us will be the ones who wind up in the gutter. If productive people are to have a future, we better wake up to this greatest evil and outlaw it. Those who accept it are childish economic cowards who hate their own fathers for not getting rich and spoiling them. A wannabe Preppie has no right to call himself an American. The motto of a real man is, "If we have to do it on our own, so must the sons of the rich." Imagine some team owner who himself had inherited the team. What if he was so sure he had a right to it (imaginary, all these tyrants know they are playing the rest of us for suckers) that he tells his players that they, too, can pass on their positions to their sons. Soon that team would wind up in last place year after year and have to be disbanded. So will we. You really expect that these rich spoiled brats, whose father made money by extracting wealth at the labor of others, would even relinquish the control? They use this CORRUPT SYSTEM for their own benefits, by influencing the government, systems, and such other things. I really don't know why people just sell their MORALITY for some MATERIAL BENEFITS AND COMFORTS,which never LASTS LONG. Crunch, Crunch! Squish, Squish!We far outnumber the HeirHeads and can crush them like grapes. It's time to quit whining and start making wine. The fact that they control the laws shouldn't make us let the laws control us.
|
|
Siluk
Junior Member
Posts: 76
Likes: 47
Ethnicity: Turk
Country: Turkey
Ancestry: Yörük Turkmen
Politics: Kemalist
Religion: Atheist
Hero: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
Age: Getting Old
Philosophy: Kemalism
|
Post by Siluk on Mar 14, 2020 17:54:20 GMT
I think the tradition of burying your daughter due to shame, in pre-Islamic polytheistic Arabia is a good candidate for worst tradition ever.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2020 0:22:40 GMT
I think the tradition of burying your daughter due to shame, in pre-Islamic polytheistic Arabia is a good candidate for worst tradition ever. They were doing so that Arabs don't rape their girls
|
|
Siluk
Junior Member
Posts: 76
Likes: 47
Ethnicity: Turk
Country: Turkey
Ancestry: Yörük Turkmen
Politics: Kemalist
Religion: Atheist
Hero: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
Age: Getting Old
Philosophy: Kemalism
|
Post by Siluk on Mar 15, 2020 23:37:18 GMT
I think the tradition of burying your daughter due to shame, in pre-Islamic polytheistic Arabia is a good candidate for worst tradition ever. They were doing so that Arabs don't rape their girls That's not true, it was Arabs burying their own daughters because having a son was more valued, and even if it were true it's still a mindless tradition that makes no sense. Good thing Islam reformed them, too bad it didn't do a particularly good job of it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2020 5:01:40 GMT
They were doing so that Arabs don't rape their girls That's not true, it was Arabs burying their own daughters because having a son was more valued, and even if it were true it's still a mindless tradition that makes no sense. Because, when the CAUCASIAN PAGANS were residing in arabs, they would have raped those yemeni and barkas girls, so buried. Good thing Islam reformed them, too bad it didn't do a particularly good job of it.
Then why these people are always running behind girls and small kids, and implant bombs everywhere? Only reason why islam gets pushed is because of LIBERALISM, LEFTISM and MULTI CULTURAL, and not to forget PETROL
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 20, 2020 19:20:33 GMT
Surely, if kids had lived in communism, while grown-ups would live in liberalism. Earmarks, tauros, brands - is what kills any fairness. Unfortunately, it seems that it's really hard to imply this. How to organize it? Richs are ones who eat and eat, and eat again. They would swallow up the lands, then giving up. To cut 'em down is to diminish their hungriness. Their hungriness is a common disaster, a horrible plague. Getting rid of that means - to cut off their gluttony, but how to? We don't know the key pass to their empty vaults? All I can say that their greed is similar to quicksands and deserts. What kind of vast emptiness do their hungriness have? Allowing the Dead to Pass on Anything Is NecrocracyIt can be stopped by bypassing the rich, who may deserve their present situation, and taking away their unearned afterlife by downgrading their sons. It is misleading the way these ruling classes are attacked, as having abused their power rather than not having earned any power at all if it is inherited. What kind of competition puts the sons of previous winners ahead of the starting line by the same space their fathers finished? And you're also wrong in thinking they want to take anything of ours; they want to prevent us from having anything in the first place. The Right Wing of this vulture says, "I got mine; I'm not going to let you have yours." Its mirror-image Left Wing says, "I've got mine; I'm going to give yours away." Riches can't be stopped. We're all riches by collecting anything. They're mining gold and hide it in the vaults. We do almost the same, but with the other things. Humanity is on the bridge. It's almost jump off it. Nothing good humanity did to the Earth. We are an epiphenomenon.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Mar 22, 2020 23:52:37 GMT
2. Throwing the bouquet at weddings.I think it's retarded. It doesn't mean that if you catch it then you'll be the next to marry. Sorry, but that's false! So, stop doing it. Plus, I don't want a bride'a bouquet. I only want mine. So I'd never throw my boquet to someone else. I'll bring it home with me for my memories. If you're gonna cry about it then I'll grab some flowers outside and throw them at you to make you feel better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2020 3:22:22 GMT
The thing is that this caste system was brought by some portugese people, and british used it for their purpose and even the republic of india still kept the same tradition alive Indian castes are not related with the Latin America Castizo types. You are correct. Throughout Latin America, the Caribbean, and the American South there were race based caste systems. It worked differently depending on where it was implemented though with Latin America having a bunch of different castes based on different racial mixtures while here in the Deep South there were only the white and black castes with the one drop rule relegating anyone who had even one drop of black blood in them to the bottom caste. Our caste system came from Barbados in which my state of South Carolina was settled from. An interesting book on the racial caste system in the Deep South is the book Deep South an Anthropological Study of Caste and Class where these researchers I think from the University of Chicago went to the Mississippi Delta in the 1930's, blended in with black and white society and studied the complex relationships between the black and white racial castes and the kind of aristocratic class system that still survived at that time where plantation owners still ran society and were treated like noble houses would be in Europe. It was actually rather disturbing. British, actually learned lot of languages, like persian, urdu, turkish and even sanskrit. And, they translated lot of persian texts into sanskrit, with an ulterior motive, and that's when AIT was fragmented, that an aryans race invaded subcontinent long time back, in bronze chariot. What he was talking about in reality was an invasion of people who designated themselves as aryans from central asia, towards the region of North West Frontier provinces, Sindh, Balochistan and Persian regsion, from Andronovo, but to impose themselves on India, ended up creating a false notion of AIT. That Invasion never happened in the main stream subcontinent created by british. And still, academia are persisting with this. It's like, very very rare people in subcontinent resemble those Central Asian types. OVerall, the mainstream Indians still look same, have their culture intact even today, and have not changed much, despite so many invasion after invasion
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Mar 26, 2020 7:02:41 GMT
You are correct. Throughout Latin America, the Caribbean, and the American South there were race based caste systems. It worked differently depending on where it was implemented though with Latin America having a bunch of different castes based on different racial mixtures while here in the Deep South there were only the white and black castes with the one drop rule relegating anyone who had even one drop of black blood in them to the bottom caste. Our caste system came from Barbados in which my state of South Carolina was settled from. An interesting book on the racial caste system in the Deep South is the book Deep South an Anthropological Study of Caste and Class where these researchers I think from the University of Chicago went to the Mississippi Delta in the 1930's, blended in with black and white society and studied the complex relationships between the black and white racial castes and the kind of aristocratic class system that still survived at that time where plantation owners still ran society and were treated like noble houses would be in Europe. It was actually rather disturbing. British, actually learned lot of languages, like persian, urdu, turkish and even sanskrit. And, they translated lot of persian texts into sanskrit, with an ulterior motive, and that's when AIT was fragmented, that an aryans race invaded subcontinent long time back, in bronze chariot. What he was talking about in reality was an invasion of people who designated themselves as aryans from central asia, towards the region of North West Frontier provinces, Sindh, Balochistan and Persian regsion, from Andronovo, but to impose themselves on India, ended up creating a false notion of AIT. That Invasion never happened in the main stream subcontinent created by british. And still, academia are persisting with this. It's like, very very rare people in subcontinent resemble those Central Asian types. OVerall, the mainstream Indians still look same, have their culture intact even today, and have not changed much, despite so many invasion after invasion So are you against the Aryan invasion theory? Don't northern Indians speak Indo European languages and historically worshipped Indo European gods like Indra? You are ethnically Aryan correct?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2020 8:29:34 GMT
British, actually learned lot of languages, like persian, urdu, turkish and even sanskrit. And, they translated lot of persian texts into sanskrit, with an ulterior motive, and that's when AIT was fragmented, that an aryans race invaded subcontinent long time back, in bronze chariot. What he was talking about in reality was an invasion of people who designated themselves as aryans from central asia, towards the region of North West Frontier provinces, Sindh, Balochistan and Persian regsion, from Andronovo, but to impose themselves on India, ended up creating a false notion of AIT. That Invasion never happened in the main stream subcontinent created by british. And still, academia are persisting with this. It's like, very very rare people in subcontinent resemble those Central Asian types. OVerall, the mainstream Indians still look same, have their culture intact even today, and have not changed much, despite so many invasion after invasion So are you against the Aryan invasion theory? Don't northern Indians speak Indo European languages and historically worshipped Indo European gods like Indra? You are ethnically Aryan correct?I said, the aryan invastion never happened in the india which you are seeing. The indian map which you are seeing today, never existed. Aryan invasion happened, but only on northern regions,and that too till punjab, definitely not in southern part of India, the Deccan Plateau. That had invasion from european and arabs, and turkmen and bahamanis . After that, there was an eastern migration of descendants of these indo -european people, who brought a language called bengali. //worshipped Indo European gods like Indra? ?// No, no one worhips any aryan god now, none of the 5 aryan lords are worshipped in today's time I look central asian, so i have to be
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2020 9:42:46 GMT
By the time, the descendants of these aryans migrated out of punjab, towards INDO-GANGETIC PLAINS, they already were a M#$#$ BREEDS
That was 3500 years back, once the aryan kindgom fell.
Lot of these people took the services of native indo kings, some enrolled themselves as charioteers, hired mercenaries, some became poets, some studied engineering.
But one thing is sure, neither the descendants of these INDO-EUROPEANS, after migrations, ever called themselves as BRAHMINS or SUPERIOR CASTE.
|
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP
Elder
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Mar 27, 2020 10:51:46 GMT
So are you against the Aryan invasion theory? Don't northern Indians speak Indo European languages and historically worshipped Indo European gods like Indra? You are ethnically Aryan correct?I said, the aryan invastion never happened in the india which you are seeing. The indian map which you are seeing today, never existed. Aryan invasion happened, but only on northern regions,and that too till punjab, definitely not in southern part of India, the Deccan Plateau. That had invasion from european and arabs, and turkmen and bahamanis . After that, there was an eastern migration of descendants of these indo -european people, who brought a language called bengali. //worshipped Indo European gods like Indra? ?// No, no one worhips any aryan god now, none of the 5 aryan lords are worshipped in today's time I look central asian, so i have to be I agree with you from what i've seen of Indian history and ethnography that India is an artificial creation of the British empire. There are many places where the borders do not map well with the cultural reality of the area and the national identity of the country in question is based on a falsehood. My country the United States is one such country. Before the United States of America became one country it was 13 British colonies that were hugging the Atlantic coast of North America. These colonies were founded at different times by different groups of people. The origin story we are told about the Puritans coming on the Mayflower really only applied to New England. My state South Carolina was founded as an extension of the slave colonies of the Caribbean (especially Barbados) and was and still is culturally opposed to New England and greater New England in every way. The Puritans, the Dutch, the Quakers, the Scots Irish, The Royalist Cavaliers, the Anglo Caribbean slavers, the French, and the Spanish all settled certain areas of the United States and created distinct regional cultures (what you would call "nations" in the old world) in what is now the United States. The only reason that the 13 colonies banded together under one government was because they were afraid of being conquered by the British, French, or Spanish empire if they stayed independent from one another. However before the Civil War people still identified with their state rather than with the United States as a whole and the differences between Americans were known and written about. Everyone knew that the Puritanical Yankees, the Scots Irish crackers, the slave holding cavaliers and the like were different than one another and as Robert Barnwell Rhett wrote, there was no such thing as the American people. Then the Civil War happened and the Puritan Yankees basically invented an American identity that glorified their own culture as the culture of everyone and forced their hegemony on everyone else. Thus certain Yankee notions like American exceptionalism (which comes from the Puritan notion that the Puritans were God's chosen people spread to the rest of America), Manifest destiny (comes from the Puritan notion that God has given his chosen people this land), White Anglo Saxon Protestant identity and supremacy, the protestant work ethic, Hamiltonianism, origin myths regarding the Mayflower Thanksgiving and the Boston tea party, the hailing of New England literature written by Nathaniel Hawthorne, Ralph Waldo Emerson, David Henry Thoreau, Walt Whitman and others as "the national literature" (to the point where when I took an "American literature class" in college they scant talked about anyone else but New Englanders despite us being in the south and some of the greatest writers like Faulkner, Tennessee Williams, Flannery O'Connor, William Gilmore Simms, and the like not to mention Edgar Allen Poe and Mark Twain being from the south), the idea of the melting pot (which was a Yankee remedy to non Anglo Saxon Protestants entering their lands for assimilating them into their culture, and even the pledge of allegiance which was written by a New England socialist, became quintessentially "American." Now don't take this as an attack upon Yankees though the secularized version of their former Puritanism has become the cancerous SJW leftism of today. I admire a lot about their culture (or at least an older version of their culture before they went full retard) but they need to leave the south alone. Living in a country that is divided between different cultures which are diametrically opposed to one another like India or the United States can lead to tension and polarization. Best to split the country apart according to these cultures so that one does not interfere with the other. Good fences make good neighbors as the saying goes. The only problem is that my country is the world superpower right now and breaking it apart might lead to economic disaster, world instability, and the rise of tyrannical China as the world hegemon. My solution to this problem then is decentralization in my country. Let the states run themselves. Let Texas run Texas without interference from California and vice versa. Let the powers of the Federal Government be limited and let the states run themselves. Basically import the Swiss model to the United States.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2020 16:08:45 GMT
I said, the aryan invastion never happened in the india which you are seeing. The indian map which you are seeing today, never existed. Aryan invasion happened, but only on northern regions,and that too till punjab, definitely not in southern part of India, the Deccan Plateau. That had invasion from european and arabs, and turkmen and bahamanis . After that, there was an eastern migration of descendants of these indo -european people, who brought a language called bengali. //worshipped Indo European gods like Indra? ?// No, no one worhips any aryan god now, none of the 5 aryan lords are worshipped in today's time I look central asian, so i have to be I agree with you from what i've seen of Indian history and ethnography that India is an artificial creation of the British empire. There are many places where the borders do not map well with the cultural reality of the area and the national identity of the country in question is based on a falsehood. My country the United States is one such country. Before the United States of America became one country it was 13 British colonies that were hugging the Atlantic coast of North America. These colonies were founded at different times by different groups of people. The origin story we are told about the Puritans coming on the Mayflower really only applied to New England. My state South Carolina was founded as an extension of the slave colonies of the Caribbean (especially Barbados) and was and still is culturally opposed to New England and greater New England in every way. The Puritans, the Dutch, the Quakers, the Scots Irish, The Royalist Cavaliers, the Anglo Caribbean slavers, the French, and the Spanish all settled certain areas of the United States and created distinct regional cultures (what you would call "nations" in the old world) in what is now the United States. The only reason that the 13 colonies banded together under one government was because they were afraid of being conquered by the British, French, or Spanish empire if they stayed independent from one another. However before the Civil War people still identified with their state rather than with the United States as a whole and the differences between Americans were known and written about. Everyone knew that the Puritanical Yankees, the Scots Irish crackers, the slave holding cavaliers and the like were different than one another and as Robert Barnwell Rhett wrote, there was no such thing as the American people. Then the Civil War happened and the Puritan Yankees basically invented an American identity that glorified their own culture as the culture of everyone and forced their hegemony on everyone else. Thus certain Yankee notions like American exceptionalism (which comes from the Puritan notion that the Puritans were God's chosen people spread to the rest of America), Manifest destiny (comes from the Puritan notion that God has given his chosen people this land), White Anglo Saxon Protestant identity and supremacy, the protestant work ethic, Hamiltonianism, origin myths regarding the Mayflower Thanksgiving and the Boston tea party, the hailing of New England literature written by Nathaniel Hawthorne, Ralph Waldo Emerson, David Henry Thoreau, Walt Whitman and others as "the national literature" (to the point where when I took an "American literature class" in college they scant talked about anyone else but New Englanders despite us being in the south and some of the greatest writers like Faulkner, Tennessee Williams, Flannery O'Connor, William Gilmore Simms, and the like not to mention Edgar Allen Poe and Mark Twain being from the south), the idea of the melting pot (which was a Yankee remedy to non Anglo Saxon Protestants entering their lands for assimilating them into their culture, and even the pledge of allegiance which was written by a New England socialist, became quintessentially "American." Now don't take this as an attack upon Yankees though the secularized version of their former Puritanism has become the cancerous SJW leftism of today. I admire a lot about their culture (or at least an older version of their culture before they went full retard) but they need to leave the south alone. Living in a country that is divided between different cultures which are diametrically opposed to one another like India or the United States can lead to tension and polarization. Best to split the country apart according to these cultures so that one does not interfere with the other. Good fences make good neighbors as the saying goes. The only problem is that my country is the world superpower right now and breaking it apart might lead to economic disaster, world instability, and the rise of tyrannical China as the world hegemon. My solution to this problem then is decentralization in my country. Let the states run themselves. Let Texas run Texas without interference from California and vice versa. Let the powers of the Federal Government be limited and let the states run themselves. Basically import the Swiss model to the United States. I don't understand, how can all those groups be considered as ANGLO SAXON aristocrat. Definitely, spanish medditernean are not even closer to french normans or teutonic knights? So this caste phenomenon is prevalent in america too, of course, indian constitution has been drafted or moulded on the basis of american constitutition, because the one who framed it, studied from columbia university, which happens to be an IVY LEAGUE, controlled by WASPS. Same thing came here also, under the garb of caste system, where anyone, who happens to have some aristocratic position were moulded as brahmins, thinking that all brahmins would be same. They never checked FACES of BRAHMINS though.
|
|