|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 20, 2020 22:13:52 GMT
Surely, I understand that 'trolling' may vary. It may have more or less appearance, and so on.
I took 'trolling' in general as it had been using in many forums.
Another question is - what corresponds in Holy Scriptures to 'trolling'? Is there anything that Bible says about it?
|
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Feb 20, 2020 23:44:00 GMT
Surely, I understand that 'trolling' may vary. It may have more or less appearance, and so on. I took 'trolling' in general as it had been using in many forums. Another question is - what corresponds in Holy Scriptures to 'trolling'? Is there anything that Bible says about it? The Scribes and Pharisees always baiting Jesus were trolls. Panhandling is also a sin: "Thou Shalt Not Covet Thy Neighbor's Goods." A moocher is nothing but a thief trying it the easy way first. |
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Feb 28, 2020 13:36:59 GMT
Surely, I understand that 'trolling' may vary. It may have more or less appearance, and so on. I took 'trolling' in general as it had been using in many forums. Another question is - what corresponds in Holy Scriptures to 'trolling'? Is there anything that Bible says about it? The Scribes and Pharisees always baiting Jesus were trolls. Panhandling is also a sin: "Thou Shalt Not Covet Thy Neighbor's Goods." A moocher is nothing but a thief trying it the easy way first. Wow. The old temples had a first duty of feeding the poor, and here you would have had church close it's doors to them and call them moochers. You see people coveting food as evil, while ignoring what the Golden Rule would have the churches do. Jesus brought all the commandments to two, one being the Golden Rule, and here you are ignoring his big rule to do the evil thing and follow some other rule. Jesus would reject you as he said he would know his people by their acts and deeds. You close the door that Jesus says should always be open. Regards DL |
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Feb 28, 2020 13:42:30 GMT
Surely, I understand that 'trolling' may vary. It may have more or less appearance, and so on. I took 'trolling' in general as it had been using in many forums. Another question is - what corresponds in Holy Scriptures to 'trolling'? Is there anything that Bible says about it? I am sometimes accused of trolling just for trying to start a debate on issues. I was just banned from a bible study site for trying to have the group look at certain biblical passages that have been controversial over time. Many do not want to know the truth and are too insecure in their religions to even attempt decent apologetics. This fear is likely why religions are shrinking as their are no decent apologists for them. Regards DL |
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Feb 28, 2020 13:45:58 GMT
To be a sin, a victim has to be hurt somehow by an action.
If a troll does go by, whatever that term really means, I do not see a victim being created and thus there is no sin involved.
Regards
DL
|
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Feb 28, 2020 20:07:52 GMT
The Homeless Are Lazy Crybabies and Spoiled Brats Afraid to Grow UpThe Scribes and Pharisees always baiting Jesus were trolls. Panhandling is also a sin: "Thou Shalt Not Covet Thy Neighbor's Goods." A moocher is nothing but a thief trying it the easy way first. The old temples had a first duty of feeding the poor, and here you would have had the church close it's its doors to them and call them moochers. You see people coveting food as evil, while ignoring what the Golden Rule would have the churches do. Jesus brought all the commandments to two, one being the Golden Rule, and here you are ignoring his big rule to do the evil thing and follow some other rule. Regards DL St. Paul said, "If you won't work, you deserve to starve to death." You're trying to extend sympathy for people whose poverty is not their own fault to worthless lazy trash. It is a degenerate extension of a good thing, just like modern immigration, which is nothing more than a hostile invasion of inferior people trying to freeload off what other people built. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Feb 28, 2020 22:23:51 GMT
To be a sin, a victim has to be hurt somehow by an action. If a troll does go by, whatever that term really means, I do not see a victim being created and thus there is no sin involved. Regards DL A strange situation may occur then. For instance, to satisfy my feeling I used trolling while the trolled person got offended. I was satisfied with trolling, and my foe was hurt with it. Who made a sin? |
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Feb 29, 2020 18:43:35 GMT
To be a sin, a victim has to be hurt somehow by an action. If a troll does go by, whatever that term really means, I do not see a victim being created and thus there is no sin involved. Regards DL A strange situation may occur then. For instance, to satisfy my feeling I used trolling while the trolled person got offended. I was satisfied with trolling, and my foe was hurt with it. Who made a sin?
It depends on who was wrong. Don't let the Masters tell you it depends on the action; that lie started with Socrates. "Two wrongs don't make a right" is meant to keep us from getting even. It begs the question by assuming that the retaliation was as bad as or even worse than the action of whoever started the confrontation. |
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Mar 2, 2020 22:10:38 GMT
The old temples had a first duty of feeding the poor, and here you would have had the church close it's its doors to them and call them moochers. You see people coveting food as evil, while ignoring what the Golden Rule would have the churches do. Jesus brought all the commandments to two, one being the Golden Rule, and here you are ignoring his big rule to do the evil thing and follow some other rule. Regards DL St. Paul said, "If you won't work, you deserve to starve to death." You're trying to extend sympathy for people whose poverty is not their own fault to worthless lazy trash. It is a degenerate extension of a good thing, just like modern immigration, which is nothing more than a hostile invasion of inferior people trying to freeload off what other people built. Nice that you put St Paul ahead of Jesus and his teachings. Put no other god above me is the commandment you are breaking. Regards DL |
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Mar 2, 2020 22:18:56 GMT
To be a sin, a victim has to be hurt somehow by an action. If a troll does go by, whatever that term really means, I do not see a victim being created and thus there is no sin involved. Regards DL A strange situation may occur then. For instance, to satisfy my feeling I used trolling while the trolled person got offended. I was satisfied with trolling, and my foe was hurt with it. Who made a sin? We have not defined trolling, but when I get trolled by Christians, which happens often, I do not get offended. I get even. If you are offended by word from some anonymous retard, that is your problem and not the trolls who just might be seeing things differently and not trolling at all. That was the royal you, btw. There is a post here with this --- The Homeless Are Lazy Crybabies and Spoiled Brats Afraid to Grow Up Is that a brain dead poster or is that an example of a Christian trolling and sinning? Regards DL |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Mar 3, 2020 20:02:42 GMT
A strange situation may occur then. For instance, to satisfy my feeling I used trolling while the trolled person got offended. I was satisfied with trolling, and my foe was hurt with it. Who made a sin? We have not defined trolling, but when I get trolled by Christians, which happens often, I do not get offended. I get even. If you are offended by word from some anonymous retard, that is your problem and not the trolls who just might be seeing things differently and not trolling at all. That was the royal you, btw. There is a post here with this --- The Homeless Are Lazy Crybabies and Spoiled Brats Afraid to Grow Up Is that a brain dead poster or is that an example of a Christian trolling and sinning? Regards DL (My English is indeed bad. I didn't mean anyone was offended.) No, it's not so important what trolling is in passage I've described. A troll may be satisfied by using trolling while a trolled person may be offended. So, the question is who's made a sin: a troll, or a trolled person? It doesn't matter who's right and who's wrong, because for any Christian confessions the question still is - to troll or not to troll? However, "what does it mean 'to troll'" as a term is necessary. I guess that trolling - is to get a series of offenses to a person and to provoke it to make a certain response; the similar way to do it is to make a public slander as newsmakers usually get to do. |
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Mar 3, 2020 21:32:17 GMT
We have not defined trolling, but when I get trolled by Christians, which happens often, I do not get offended. I get even. If you are offended by word from some anonymous retard, that is your problem and not the trolls who just might be seeing things differently and not trolling at all. That was the royal you, btw. There is a post here with this --- The Homeless Are Lazy Crybabies and Spoiled Brats Afraid to Grow Up Is that a brain dead poster or is that an example of a Christian trolling and sinning? Regards DL (My English is indeed bad. I didn't mean anyone was offended.) No, it's not so important what trolling is in passage I've described. A troll may be satisfied by using trolling while a trolled person may be offended. So, the question is who's made a sin: a troll, or a trolled person? It doesn't matter who's right and who's wrong, because for any Christian confessions the question still is - to troll or not to troll? However, "what does it mean 'to troll'" as a term is necessary. I guess that trolling - is to get a series of offenses to a person and to provoke it to make a certain response; the similar way to do it is to make a public slander as newsmakers usually get to do. I will ignore your last as you gave no example. Your description of trolling is rather vague. Give an example of what a trolling statement is and we can talk of a real situation. To a guy like me, no topic is taboo and perhaps that is why I do not agree that introducing any topic is trolling. Of late, I saw a Christian say that women like to kill babies and that is why they use abortion. That may offend women, but not the intelligent ones who will just read it and discard it as garbage. If you see that as trolling, we can use it as an example. Regards DL |
|
KGrim
Full Member
Coming back to Arktos...for a little while anyways...just to see how things are doing.
Posts: 442
Likes: 238
Country: USA
Region: South East
Location: East Texas
Ancestry: Scotch-Irish
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Eastern Orthodox
Hero: Jesus
Age: 33 soon to be 34
Philosophy: Hesychasm
|
Post by KGrim on Mar 3, 2020 21:39:55 GMT
(My English is indeed bad. I didn't mean anyone was offended.) No, it's not so important what trolling is in passage I've described. A troll may be satisfied by using trolling while a trolled person may be offended. So, the question is who's made a sin: a troll, or a trolled person? It doesn't matter who's right and who's wrong, because for any Christian confessions the question still is - to troll or not to troll? However, "what does it mean 'to troll'" as a term is necessary. I guess that trolling - is to get a series of offenses to a person and to provoke it to make a certain response; the similar way to do it is to make a public slander as newsmakers usually get to do. I will ignore your last as you gave no example. Your description of trolling is rather vague. Give an example of what a trolling statement is and we can talk of a real situation. To a guy like me, no topic is taboo and perhaps that is why I do not agree that introducing any topic is trolling. Of late, I saw a Christian say that women like to kill babies and that is why they use abortion. That may offend women, but not the intelligent ones who will just read it and discard it as garbage. If you see that as trolling, we can use it as an example. Regards DL Wait a minute. You say intelligent women think the assertion that they are killing babies is garbage when they get an abortion? And you rag on me because I defend my God's right to take a babies life as he sees fit! You're a giant hypocrite! Condemning God for killing children and supporting women who do the same. SMH. |
|
Clovis Merovingian
Prestige/VIP 
Elder
Posts: 2,692 
Likes: 1,757
Meta-Ethnicity: Anglo-American
Ethnicity: Deep Southerner
Country: My State and my Region are my country
Region: The Deep South
Location: South Carolina
Ancestry: Gaelic (patrilineal), English, Ulster Scots/Scots Irish, Scottish, German, Swiss German, Swedish, Manx, Finnish, Norman French/Quebecois (distantly), Dutch (distantly)
Taxonomy: Borreby/Alpine/ Nordid mix
Y-DNA: R-S660/R-DF109
mtDNA: T1a1
Politics: Conservative
Religion: Christian
Hero: Andrew Jackson, Thomas Jefferson, James K. Polk
Age: 30
Philosophy: I try to find out what is true as best I can.
|
Post by Clovis Merovingian on Mar 4, 2020 1:53:25 GMT
(never mind, joke is ruined by the video being posted rather than link leading to video. I tried to rick roll everyone and I failed)
|
|
|
|
Post by greatestiam on Mar 13, 2020 19:17:33 GMT
I will ignore your last as you gave no example. Your description of trolling is rather vague. Give an example of what a trolling statement is and we can talk of a real situation. To a guy like me, no topic is taboo and perhaps that is why I do not agree that introducing any topic is trolling. Of late, I saw a Christian say that women like to kill babies and that is why they use abortion. That may offend women, but not the intelligent ones who will just read it and discard it as garbage. If you see that as trolling, we can use it as an example. Regards DL Wait a minute. You say intelligent women think the assertion that they are killing babies is garbage when they get an abortion? And you rag on me because I defend my God's right to take a babies life as he sees fit! You're a giant hypocrite! Condemning God for killing children and supporting women who do the same. SMH. Who is more moral? A woman aborting a child or a god using genocide and killing children and babies that are already born? God can cure as easily as kill, yet always chooses to kill. All women, except for the odd exception, would rather cure her situation than kill. So tell us great moralist, which entity is more moral? Regards DL |
|
