|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Jan 11, 2020 9:47:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 12, 2020 6:21:26 GMT
I already beat them up in my daydream for doing this. They're all blue from bruises and can't sit or move.
That's a big human error then. But there's no way it was unintentional. They wanted to attack it with a missile. That's called a planned attack.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Jan 12, 2020 7:00:51 GMT
I already beat them up in my daydream for doing this. They're all blue from bruises and can't sit or move. That's a big human error then. But there's no way it was unintentional. They wanted to attack it with a missile. That's called a planned attack. What did you expect from those tyrant Mullahs and their regime? |
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on Jan 12, 2020 7:01:58 GMT
That's a big human error then. But there's no way it was unintentional. Iran has an average IQ of 84, so it is entirely possible that it was unintentional. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 12, 2020 7:12:28 GMT
That's a big human error then. But there's no way it was unintentional. Iran has an average IQ of 84, so it is entirely possible that it was unintentional.  That makes sense because the regime there doesn't know how to run a country or do anything right! |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 12, 2020 7:14:17 GMT
I already beat them up in my daydream for doing this. They're all blue from bruises and can't sit or move. That's a big human error then. But there's no way it was unintentional. They wanted to attack it with a missile. That's called a planned attack. What did you expect from those tyrant Mullahs and their regime? Not to at least have the rest of the world be against them because the more enemies they'll make the less their regime has a chance to avoid being destroyed.  |
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Jan 12, 2020 7:22:20 GMT
What did you expect from those tyrant Mullahs and their regime? Not to at least have the rest of the world be against them because the more enemies they'll make the less their regime has a chance to avoid being destroyed. True. The reason why they admitted is because of undeniable evidences and the works of Canadian gov and some western intelligence agencies/services. |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Jan 12, 2020 21:06:43 GMT
Motive?
Always there is a motive, real or imaginary; justified or not.
Was it Ukraine that had something to do with the missile assassination?
Just an inductive guess, mind you.
Or was this something to do with the Netherlands jet which went down
and which was blamed on the Russians by the west, but which had
an at least equal chance of being downed by the Ukraine?
Or both of the above, and then some...
|
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 12, 2020 21:13:27 GMT
Motive? Always there is a motive, real or imaginary; justified or not. Was it Ukraine that had something to do with the missile assassination? Just an inductive guess, mind you. Or was this something to do with the Netherlands jet which went down and which was blamed on the Russians by the west, but which had an at least equal chance of being downed by the Ukraine? Or both of the above, and then some... It's been said that it's the drama between the US and Iran and that Iran was practicing their weapons in case the US pulls something. So...I heard they thought it was the US coming and not a Ukrainian plane flying across their land and shot it down unintentionally. Then when they realized their mistake they lied and said it wasn't them. When the evidence came forward that it was them then they admitted to it saying it was unintentional. |
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Jan 13, 2020 11:31:26 GMT
The year 2020 didn't start very well...  |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jan 17, 2020 12:10:58 GMT
Oh yes, it was.
All the wars and conflicts are one big human error. The same is for destroying Nature, killing animals, killing each others, and so on.
So, yes it was the human error exactly.
However it mustn't disqualify Iran responsibilities for this.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Jan 17, 2020 21:02:28 GMT
Motive? Always there is a motive, real or imaginary; justified or not. Was it Ukraine that had something to do with the missile assassination? Just an inductive guess, mind you. Or was this something to do with the Netherlands jet which went down and which was blamed on the Russians by the west, but which had an at least equal chance of being downed by the Ukraine? Or both of the above, and then some... It's been said that it's the drama between the US and Iran and that Iran was practicing their weapons in case the US pulls something. So...I heard they thought it was the US coming and not a Ukrainian plane flying across their land and shot it down unintentionally. Then when they realized their mistake they lied and said it wasn't them. When the evidence came forward that it was them then they admitted to it saying it was unintentional. How often do people unintentionally shoot down passenger jets? Immediately after their general was assassinated? There are no coincidences in detective work. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jan 17, 2020 21:13:32 GMT
It's been said that it's the drama between the US and Iran and that Iran was practicing their weapons in case the US pulls something. So...I heard they thought it was the US coming and not a Ukrainian plane flying across their land and shot it down unintentionally. Then when they realized their mistake they lied and said it wasn't them. When the evidence came forward that it was them then they admitted to it saying it was unintentional. How often do people unintentionally shoot down passenger jets? Immediately after their general was assassinated? There are no coincidences in detective work. Motives can have plenty variations. Did they want to shoot an american plane? Did they want to shoot ukrainian plane? Did they want to fright someone? Or maybe they just tested their weapon? Which one must be picked? |
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Jan 17, 2020 21:24:02 GMT
How often do people unintentionally shoot down passenger jets? Immediately after their general was assassinated? There are no coincidences in detective work. Motives can have plenty variations. Did they want to shoot an american plane? Did they want to shoot ukrainian plane? Did they want to fright someone? Or maybe they just tested their weapon? Which one must be picked? Two likely possibilities: (A) I doubt it was an order that was discussed and strategized. Likely some mediocre official just reacted impulsively. Effectively it was Trump that pulled his trigger for him. There is always a karma backlash to any such action. (B) But hypothetically, what if it was deliberate? An obscure target, that could be half-hidden behind a veil of 'accident', knowing that enough people will figure it as a retaliation to prompt the impeachment of Trump. Either way, the effect is the same, even though it is more likely (A). If Iran did not take some form of retaliation then that would increase the likelihood of further assassinations. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jan 17, 2020 21:30:57 GMT
Motives can have plenty variations. Did they want to shoot an american plane? Did they want to shoot ukrainian plane? Did they want to fright someone? Or maybe they just tested their weapon? Which one must be picked? Two likely possibilities: (A) I doubt it was an order that was discussed and strategized. Likely some mediocre official just reacted impulsively. Effectively it was Trump that pulled his trigger for him. There is always a karma backlash to any such action. (B) But hypothetically, what if it was deliberate? An obscure target, that could be half-hidden behind a veil of 'accident', knowing that enough people will figure it as a retaliation to prompt the impeachment of Trump. Either way, the effect is the same, even though it is more likely (A). If Iran did not take some form of retaliation then that would increase the likelihood of further assassinations. I agree with you on A. It seems for me to be very likely as you said. Also, there were in panic; maybe the strike (from the US base, I guess) might be expected. They wanted to start doing something, but they didn't know how exactly should they start. I lean to panicking version as long as the attack was obviously stupid and disaster. After the missile strike their position hadn't been much protected. I think that action discouraged them. And 'the human error' as they stated, perhaps, increases your version of A. |
|
That makes sense because the regime there doesn't know how to run a country or do anything right! 
