kristophercussans
New Member
Posts: 3
Likes: 1
Ethnicity: Elvish
Country: PRC
Location: Shanghai
Age: 23
Philosophy: Moderate Deontology
|
Post by kristophercussans on Jan 3, 2020 22:38:51 GMT
A Tribunal has classified 'Ethical Veganism' a philisophical belief. Article from the BBCIt seems obvious that with the title 'ethical' it is clearly a philisophical belief, but this is in the context of UK law and the legal exemptions provided to religious groups. Religious exemption examples: - Sikhs and hard-hats
- Muslims and serving pork
- Catholics conducting abortions
It is unclear what the list would include for ethical vegans at the moment. Though I can think of some potential examples: - Being made to wear safety equipment made from non-human animal leather (e.g. saftey gloves)
- Serving meat at a supermarket or restaurant Teaching anthropocentric or speciest content at a school
- Teaching anthropocentric or speciest content at a school
This doesn't make ethical veganism a religion, it has allowed secular ethics a spot within legal exemptions. Though it is still unclear what the practical implications of this ruling are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 4, 2020 1:02:07 GMT
Catholics kill babies too? Ugh. I seem to always find worse things about them.  But back to ethical veganism. It's not a religion. It's just how people view it. And some might eat some meat while thinking the other meat is unethical. I see it religiously though since I'm religious and so I apply my religion to this. In the bible God made animals for human purposes He says. Meaning for food or clothing. God Himself killed animals to make clothing for Adam and Eve. So we can kill them to wear them. God also used it for food. In human form (Jesus) He killed fish and ate it. Only thing God doesn't allow is to torture the animal. Just make it painlessly as possible. Can you explain the sikhs and hard hats though? |
|
kristophercussans
New Member
Posts: 3
Likes: 1
Ethnicity: Elvish
Country: PRC
Location: Shanghai
Age: 23
Philosophy: Moderate Deontology
|
Post by kristophercussans on Jan 4, 2020 14:46:39 GMT
Yes, in the UK Sikhs are exempt from wearing hard hats as according to their religious requirements they must wear a religious turban. The turban shows others how dedicated that person is to their faith, it is also supposed to protect the hair which is usually grown long. The exemption is so that Sikhs can work on building sites with non-sikhs, where hard-hats are required for safety reasons (i.e. falling debris).
|
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Jan 4, 2020 21:53:42 GMT
A Tribunal has classified 'Ethical Veganism' a philisophical belief. Article from the BBCIt seems obvious that with the title 'ethical' it is clearly a philisophical belief, but this is in the context of UK law and the legal exemptions provided to religious groups. Religious exemption examples: - Sikhs and hard-hats
- Muslims and serving pork
- Catholics conducting abortions
It is unclear what the list would include for ethical vegans at the moment. Though I can think of some potential examples: - Being made to wear safety equipment made from non-human animal leather (e.g. saftey gloves)
- Serving meat at a supermarket or restaurant Teaching anthropocentric or speciest content at a school
- Teaching anthropocentric or speciest content at a school
This doesn't make ethical veganism a religion, it has allowed secular ethics a spot within legal exemptions. Though it is still unclear what the practical implications of this ruling are.
Nature has a way of re-inforcing itself. For most of human history, it took a lot of courage to kill wild animals for food; it took no courage at all to pick plants. The self-appointed ruling class wouldn't survive if its subjects had courage; that's why it promotes vicious Veganism, especially in Hindu India's crushing caste system. With this treason in mind, we shouldn't tolerate emasculating Veganism or dismiss it as a harmless preference. |
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Jan 4, 2020 21:58:47 GMT
Yes, in the UK Sikhs are exempt from wearing hard hats as according to their religious requirements they must wear a religious turban. The turban shows others how dedicated that person is to their faith, it is also supposed to protect the hair which is usually grown long. The exemption is so that Sikhs can work on building sites with non-sikhs, where hard-hats are required for safety reasons (i.e. falling debris). They shouldn't be allowed to work in those jobs. If they were honest, they'd consider it as a sacrifice for their faith and wouldn't hypocritically and greedily sue over "religious discrimination." |
|
kristophercussans
New Member
Posts: 3
Likes: 1
Ethnicity: Elvish
Country: PRC
Location: Shanghai
Age: 23
Philosophy: Moderate Deontology
|
Post by kristophercussans on Jan 5, 2020 21:13:02 GMT
Vegans don't want you to be a human vegetable. You do not need courage to pick plants, you do not need courage to pick up some packaged meat in a supermarket or click order on your food app. Food is purchased with currency not courage and why is courage needed in acquering food at any rate? What is so masculine about buying meat from the supermarket, or a factory farm? Why should we define ourselves by how masculine or immasculine some is percieved? yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 13, 2020 2:15:34 GMT
Yes, in the UK Sikhs are exempt from wearing hard hats as according to their religious requirements they must wear a religious turban. The turban shows others how dedicated that person is to their faith, it is also supposed to protect the hair which is usually grown long. The exemption is so that Sikhs can work on building sites with non-sikhs, where hard-hats are required for safety reasons (i.e. falling debris). Why must they have long hair? It is a bit feminine in my opinion. Also, there are some jobs that require you to wear hard hats to protect your head from injuries. Are they not allowed to work those jobs at all? |
|
|
|
Post by unrealmanifest on Jan 13, 2020 4:14:07 GMT
Yes, in the UK Sikhs are exempt from wearing hard hats as according to their religious requirements they must wear a religious turban. The turban shows others how dedicated that person is to their faith, it is also supposed to protect the hair which is usually grown long. The exemption is so that Sikhs can work on building sites with non-sikhs, where hard-hats are required for safety reasons (i.e. falling debris). Why must they have long hair? It is a bit feminine in my opinion. Also, there are some jobs that require you to wear hard hats to protect your head from injuries. Are they not allowed to work those jobs at all? Sikhs have long hair as it is a part of their religious beliefs. Growing out the hair happens for both males and females. It truly is no different than religious belief of mormons to go on missions when coming of age, just as Pentecostals talk in tongues, or just as many normal Christians participate in communion. It's just what they do. As for femininity, many ancient men had longer hair. Those from the Middle east, Celts, and Nordic in particular. In this case Sikhs are given the right to not wear a hard hat due to their religious beliefs, just as one can be a conscientious objector during combat in the American Millitary due to ones religious beliefs or how you can excuse your own child from the teachings of Darwinism due to religious belief. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jan 13, 2020 4:20:29 GMT
Why must they have long hair? It is a bit feminine in my opinion. Also, there are some jobs that require you to wear hard hats to protect your head from injuries. Are they not allowed to work those jobs at all? Sikhs have long hair as it is a part of their religious beliefs. Growing out the hair happens for both males and females. It truly is no different than religious belief of mormons to go on missions when coming of age, just as Pentecostals talk in tongues, or just as many normal Christians participate in communion. It's just what they do. As for femininity, many ancient men had longer hair. Those from the Middle east, Celts, and Nordic in particular. In this case Sikhs are given the right to not wear a hard hat due to their religious beliefs, just as one can be a conscientious objector during combat in the American Millitary due to ones religious beliefs or how you can excuse your own child from the teachings of Darwinism due to religious belief. So you mean they can still have a job where they can wear a hard hat but they can use their religious beliefs to not wear it even if it might hurt them on the job? But ancient men also didn't have a barber shop or scissors and such. They mostly used a sword to cut hair. It had to get long before they could chop it off better without hurting themselves. |
|
|
|
Post by unrealmanifest on Jan 13, 2020 4:27:53 GMT
So you mean they can still have a job where they can wear a hard hat but they can use their religious beliefs to not wear it even if it might hurt them on the job? But ancient men also didn't have a barber shop or scissors and such. They mostly used a sword to cut hair. It had to get long before they could chop it off better without hurting themselves. Yes. They can work on a construction site and not have to wear a hardhat as that is in direct conflict with their religious beliefs and the right of religious freedom found and protected within the UK. As for cutting ones hair with a sword, that isn't entirely true. Razors have been found dating as far back to the Bronze age. Take a look at Egypt and how many of their pharaohs were bald in their depictions. Even Cleopatra was technically bald and wore wigs. They weren't cutting the pharaohs hair with a scimitar. |
|
