|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 21, 2019 22:33:26 GMT
There are no racists, traditionalists, progressivists, enviromentalists, globalists, individualists, or kinda, but there are lots of social cliches which we use to mark a certain person for our own evil purposes. In the result, the marked people will be suffering, while we'll be enjoying our evilness.
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 22, 2019 0:14:35 GMT
There are no racists, traditionalists, progressivists, enviromentalists, globalists, individualists, or kinda, but there are lots of social cliches which we use to mark a certain person for our own evil purposes. In the result, the marked people will be suffering, while we'll be enjoying our evilness. Nice profile pic Eugene...you should look up "sphere/electricity art." Social cliches are tribes based upon a particular mindset about how to approach reality. These mindsets cycle certain axioms in order to maintain a sense of identity and security. It is a defense mechanism against the perceivable chaos of the outside world where an individual or group choose a specific cause and this cause acts as the explanation and means of movement in trying to bring order and fend off chaos within the world.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 22, 2019 19:03:00 GMT
There are no racists, traditionalists, progressivists, enviromentalists, globalists, individualists, or kinda, but there are lots of social cliches which we use to mark a certain person for our own evil purposes. In the result, the marked people will be suffering, while we'll be enjoying our evilness. Nice profile pic Eugene...you should look up "sphere/electricity art." Social cliches are tribes based upon a particular mindset about how to approach reality. These mindsets cycle certain axioms in order to maintain a sense of identity and security. It is a defense mechanism against the perceivable chaos of the outside world where an individual or group choose a specific cause and this cause acts as the explanation and means of movement in trying to bring order and fend off chaos within the world. Thank you! I am nothing, so I've posted the picture that corresponds to my self. Is this a d-fence again the chaos of the outside world or - that seems to be more suitable - the chaos of any other persons? What we call "the world" or "the universe" is simply cold and firmly stable; it makes no response. A person or a living being is another story; it is able and can to response. It can harm. It can bite. It can kill. It might copy and bring me all the worst of what I feel. A butcher, for example, is much more dangerous, than an axe, because the butcher knows how to force me to feel gruesome pain. A girlfriend, for example, can harm my heart very strongly, she can kill me just saying "no". That's why any barriers and limits of the world isn't so bad trouble as any other living being. And - what should be important, I guess - do we need to use reduction here? Why reduction to non-living things might be important there where all the evil takes its begin?
|
|
|
Post by xxxxxxxxx on Nov 27, 2019 3:42:02 GMT
Nice profile pic Eugene...you should look up "sphere/electricity art." Social cliches are tribes based upon a particular mindset about how to approach reality. These mindsets cycle certain axioms in order to maintain a sense of identity and security. It is a defense mechanism against the perceivable chaos of the outside world where an individual or group choose a specific cause and this cause acts as the explanation and means of movement in trying to bring order and fend off chaos within the world. Thank you! I am nothing, so I've posted the picture that corresponds to my self. Is this a d-fence again the chaos of the outside world or - that seems to be more suitable - the chaos of any other persons? What we call "the world" or "the universe" is simply cold and firmly stable; it makes no response. What is the difference at times.A person or a living being is another story; it is able and can to response. It can harm. It can bite. It can kill. It might copy and bring me all the worst of what I feel. Nature does the same thing. A butcher, for example, is much more dangerous, than an axe, because the butcher knows how to force me to feel gruesome pain. A girlfriend, for example, can harm my heart very strongly, she can kill me just saying "no". And nature can take you as well.That's why any barriers and limits of the world isn't so bad trouble as any other living being. And - what should be important, I guess - do we need to use reduction here? Why reduction to non-living things might be important there where all the evil takes its begin? We form the world we are subject to, we are responsible. We still have famines and look we can create the food we need. Same applies for wars, etc. The World Is A Projection Of Our Values, You Can Call This Original Sin.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 27, 2019 19:09:07 GMT
Thank you! I am nothing, so I've posted the picture that corresponds to my self. Is this a d-fence again the chaos of the outside world or - that seems to be more suitable - the chaos of any other persons? What we call "the world" or "the universe" is simply cold and firmly stable; it makes no response. What is the difference at times.
It happens not rarely. Each time I reread my comments, or threads... what do I find? what do I see?.. nothing... just nothing. They are empty as myself. Nothing produces nothing.
As someone rightly said once to me: "Eugene, what's the sense of all your messages? Where's deepness and experience? For what at all do you write anything?". The one talked about my writings. That was a time I wrote lotta different materials on different subjects, but mostly it was stories, creepy stories about something. They were... I don't even know what to say... they were just like some lunatic made it. Or the complete drunk created such terrible stories... Just for example (a narrative, not original):
"A child stepped into a bus on the next bus-stop and climbed a small ladder the not very bright picture dulled into his face: "Crowdy place, eh" - a thought mumbled in his little head shaking in tact with a bus's curvy way. A little child, the nature's gift and grown-ups pleasure, did some movements with his hands taking an automatic powerful rifle too quickly to be sure everything was made perfectly. He did, and now he can clear&dance here. "Shut your stinky mouths!" - He shouted. "I warn you if you step closer the gun will offer gruesome death t'y'all!!". "I want money&now!". As it was discovered soon after the indecent the boy was two years old grow. Two years old killing machine..."
Or kinda stuff...
So... I don't think what I wanted to say then was so important. Many times catching myself on a thought - what a worthless disgusting piece'o's am I?.. A person or a living being is another story; it is able and can to response. It can harm. It can bite. It can kill. It might copy and bring me all the worst of what I feel. Nature does the same thing.
...Only good persons could say that. It's true - you're the one of the decent persons on the planet! Life isn't senseless till there are Humans. A butcher, for example, is much more dangerous, than an axe, because the butcher knows how to force me to feel gruesome pain. A girlfriend, for example, can harm my heart very strongly, she can kill me just saying "no". And nature can take you as well.
...Hmm... Have you seen Trier's "Antichrist"? Some girls I knew assured me lotta that girls=earth (girls=nature). Not knowing core thoughts of that director which isn't liked by me there's no interest for me to analyze it further. However, it has to be done since too many girls 'round me adore that director and his movies as well.
So, what did I mean saying that - I wanted to say that maybe there's no difference between girls and nature.
And also, sometimes luck rides away; just like in case of my local social life.That's why any barriers and limits of the world isn't so bad trouble as any other living being. And - what should be important, I guess - do we need to use reduction here? Why reduction to non-living things might be important there where all the evil takes its begin? We form the world we are subject to, we are responsible. We still have famines and look we can create the food we need. Same applies for wars, etc. The World Is A Projection Of Our Values, You Can Call This Original Sin.It's possibly be true. Very likely. My shameless seems to be appear each time my voice dares to utter some sinister words like the previously uttered ones.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Dec 9, 2019 23:23:21 GMT
nah racists are very real, very dangerous and thriving on the doubt fostered by those who tolerate them with a misguided sense of empathy - which is really feebleness and fear at the unpleasant task of having to risk life to defeat their evilness
apartheid was a mob of psychopaths and if you do not appreciate this then you must have lived a very coddled existence or there is some ulterior motive here
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Dec 18, 2019 18:08:42 GMT
Who even forms these cliches? Seems just another hatred against humanity and to separate from each other.
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Dec 18, 2019 21:02:35 GMT
nah racists are very real, very dangerous and thriving on the doubt fostered by those who tolerate them with a misguided sense of empathy - which is really feebleness and fear at the unpleasant task of having to risk life to defeat their evilness apartheid was a mob of psychopaths and if you do not appreciate this then you must have lived a very coddled existence or there is some ulterior motive here The Fittest Won't Survive If Their Pride Is Stripped From ThemRacism is realism. The ulterior motive of those who say it is wrong is never allowed to be debated; all we are permitted by their own mind control is to claim that we are not "racist." The Preppy Progressives refuse to discuss whether the rationality of declaring some races to be inferior can possibly be right, so they use their inherited dominance to declare that the debate is over and they have won it. Those who are born rich hate and fear all other White people. These spoiled and conceited brats are inferior themselves, with respect to holding the positions their fathers set them up in at the expense of the best of the rest. Inferior races cannot do those jobs either, so they are not cheated by Birth-Class Supremacy. Brainwashed by their parents, this Nobility With No Ability believes they have inherited enough superior genes to have evolved beyond the rest of the White race, so they choose a false ethics in order to humiliate those they consider beneath them. But racism is natural and part of the survival instinct; it is suicidal not to believe in the data that prove White superiority. Any White who is ashamed of his racism is also ashamed of his father for not getting rich and spoiling him. So he accepts this snob term and begs not to be included in the criticism of those he childishly wants to be.
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Dec 21, 2019 21:49:14 GMT
thesageofmainstreet race does not exist a species is that which can interbreed and produce viable offspring - that is real divide and rule tactics of elitists serve to confuse the masses into such arbitrary camps of division so that they can be coerced against one another to keep them weak race is just another type of nationalism, tribalism, or mob mentality
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Dec 22, 2019 22:45:03 GMT
thesageofmainstreet race does not exist a species is that which can interbreed and produce viable offspring - that is real divide and rule tactics of elitists serve to confuse the masses into such arbitrary camps of division so that they can be coerced against one another to keep them weak race is just another type of nationalism, tribalism, or mob mentality Echoes of a Prehistoric HorrorYou're using the definition of animal species; humans are not under those restrictions. The Neanderthals could interbreed with Cro-Magnons; even the race traitors in science admit that fact. Different groups evolved at different rates; some have reached their limit of evolutionary development. The savages should have gone extinct in the Stone Age, but managed to abscond into No Man's Land (literally) like any other criminal gangs looking for a hideout. The occupants of jungles, desert, mountains, and the frozen north obviously didn't go there as settlers; they are fugitives. The American Indian lucked out by being driven into two hospitable uninhabited continents, but did nothing to develop the Americas' immense natural resources. The wild must be tamed or exterminated; neglecting our evolutionary duty stifles our own progress. As for the ruling class creating some kind of mindless "racism"; in our time, it's just the opposite. The self-appointed elite knowingly forced incompatible races together. Integration leads to disintegration. Postmodern Liberals are agents of the Right Wing they were born in; they hate and fear all other White people. Their fear after the Depression led them to come up with sophisticated scheme; accomplishing the same security for themselves by doing what only appears to be the opposite of what you think. If you are referencing anti-semitism, I agree that was scapegoating. But it is simple-minded to include all racism in that process. The way it is forcibly applied today only describes realism. Like all human reactions, there can be healthy racism and evil racism. The fact that it is preached only as a pejorative proves that it is irrational to condemn what is prominent today.
|
|