|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Oct 20, 2019 19:55:06 GMT
What are the most common myths and stereotypes about what Indians eat? The biggest myth, of course, is that India is a largely vegetarian country. But that's not the case at all. Past "non-serious" estimates have suggested that more than a third of Indians ate vegetarian food. If you go by three large-scale government surveys, 23%-37% of Indians are estimated to be vegetarian. By itself this is nothing remarkably revelatory. But new research by US-based anthropologist Balmurli Natrajan and India-based economist Suraj Jacob, points to a heap of evidence that even these are inflated estimations because of "cultural and political pressures". So people under-report eating meat - particularly beef - and over-report eating vegetarian food. Taking all this into account, say the researchers, only about 20% of Indians are actually vegetarian - much lower than common claims and stereotypes suggest.Hindus, who make up 80% of the Indian population, are major meat-eaters. Even only a third of the privileged, upper-caste Indians are vegetarian.The government data shows that vegetarian households have higher income and consumption - are more affluent than meat-eating households. The lower castes, Dalits (formerly known as untouchables) and tribes-people are mainly meat eaters. -- www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-43581122 |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 29, 2019 20:33:46 GMT
What about the aryans, who came from ANDRONOVO? I guess, they were not vegetarians, neither were the invading mongol,uzbeks,turkmens, portugese etc. This vegetarianism started after post 1960. India runs on mythologies, not on facts and realities. What is not a myth? Nothing. Any human makes any thing "humanish". There's no way out. Who knows, maybe a "myth" isn't a myth at all. Out last cave on this Earth will equal us all and the worms will make things much clearer. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 29, 2019 20:39:41 GMT
Guys, ajay0 and lamburk, please, let's be more patient and respectful for each other, okay? Each of you is a talent and an intellectually bright person. I'm deadly serious. So, in the name of the Arktos's peacefulness and heavenly gardened place, just let's try to stay calm. |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2019 3:25:51 GMT
Nice fantasies. 
I go by the history books.
HEIRHEADS HAVE NO RIGHT TO EXIST Histwhorey. It never teaches the democratic fact that America defeated the British in two wars solely because the guillotine-fodder aristocratic system only used a tiny percentage of the nation's military-leadership talent. Andrew Jackson, who defeated Wellington's division, would have never been allowed to become even the lowest-ranked officer in the British army. This is the most important idea of all time, yet it never makes into books the ruling class allows to be published. India was an even worse enemy of talent; that's why the British easily overran a people who outnumbered the Redcoats 10,000 to 1. Don't be a mind-slave for what lying historians tell us about intraclass conflict causing the conquest. Those academic bookworms are pseudo-intellectual slaveboys of plutocratic parasites. They'll even admit, in cases that don't threaten their Masters, that when one class achieves sole power, it starts to fight within itself. The first famous example was the absolute birth-class supremacy that was achieved when the patricians murdered the Gracchi; the civil wars won by the first two Caesars were the inevitable result. The same happened in Korea, which lost its independence for the first time in 2,000 years because of crushing a peasant revolt in the late 19th Century.
This is what has been happening here. The last time when talent was recognized in India, when Chanakya arose and collapsed a corrupt empire. And after this, greeks were driven out, because people were recognized based on their working potential, not through hereditary of castes
Ever since the rejected aryan druhuyus or dravida people have taken over, especially since the arrival of advaita philosopher, everything has gone in disarray here. They have completely anihilated entire working potential of people and this is the reason that why everyone accepts slavery happily here, because, even if you are capable to fight it out, your family members will not help you, will try to push you down.
To make matters worse, there's an aversion against working here. People think it's a disgrace to do a work, and everyone just want to get that aristocratic class positions.
The ruling classes themselves push this more, because, it ensures, that their corruption remains intact, because, how many people in India would even dissent? Those who stand up also, they just end up being loners.
Most of the people in India are nothing more than talkers, not doers. This gets reflected in every sphere of life.
And they have been proclaiming 5000 years old civilization, greatest civilization, where as population is struggling to even meet two times a food in a day. People really here an aversion towards reaching on top, because, as I have said, males have no manliness in them now. They are impotent, and most of them are liberal, feminists types.
India has no future.
|
|
ajay0
Full Member
Posts: 160 
Likes: 77
|
Post by ajay0 on Oct 30, 2019 4:08:49 GMT
thesageofmainstreet: Every Hindu Is a DinduWhat is Dindu if I may ask ! Checked the dictionary but did not find it.
Caste system is just a feudal system that was present in europe, japan and Korea. It does not have a basis in the Vedas or Srutis and is just a manmade system that became obsolete with time.
The vedic sages, Buddha, Mahavira and Guru Nanak have also taught about the equality and fraternity of all human beings.
No one has a right to his father's wealth, property, position, or influence. All traces of this cancer must be eradicated. It is the source of the decline and fall of all civilizations, but that fact never reaches the public, because unearned inherited power and its pathetic flunkie wannabes control all transmissions of ideas.
I agree that the feudal caste system is obsolete, but should it be replaced by communism, which also holds similar theories !
|
|
ajay0
Full Member
Posts: 160
Likes: 77
|
Post by ajay0 on Oct 30, 2019 4:10:39 GMT
HEIRHEADS HAVE NO RIGHT TO EXIST Histwhorey. It never teaches the democratic fact that America defeated the British in two wars solely because the guillotine-fodder aristocratic system only used a tiny percentage of the nation's military-leadership talent. Andrew Jackson, who defeated Wellington's division, would have never been allowed to become even the lowest-ranked officer in the British army. This is the most important idea of all time, yet it never makes into books the ruling class allows to be published. India was an even worse enemy of talent; that's why the British easily overran a people who outnumbered the Redcoats 10,000 to 1. Don't be a mind-slave for what lying historians tell us about intraclass conflict causing the conquest. Those academic bookworms are pseudo-intellectual slaveboys of plutocratic parasites. They'll even admit, in cases that don't threaten their Masters, that when one class achieves sole power, it starts to fight within itself. The first famous example was the absolute birth-class supremacy that was achieved when the patricians murdered the Gracchi; the civil wars won by the first two Caesars were the inevitable result. The same happened in Korea, which lost its independence for the first time in 2,000 years because of crushing a peasant revolt in the late 19th Century.
This is what has been happening here. The last time when talent was recognized in India, when Chanakya arose and collapsed a corrupt empire. And after this, greeks were driven out, because people were recognized based on their working potential, not through hereditary of castes
Ever since the rejected aryan druhuyus or dravida people have taken over, especially since the arrival of advaita philosopher, everything has gone in disarray here. They have completely anihilated entire working potential of people and this is the reason that why everyone accepts slavery happily here, because, even if you are capable to fight it out, your family members will not help you, will try to push you down.
To make matters worse, there's an aversion against working here. People think it's a disgrace to do a work, and everyone just want to get that aristocratic class positions.
The ruling classes themselves push this more, because, it ensures, that their corruption remains intact, because, how many people in India would even dissent? Those who stand up also, they just end up being loners.
Most of the people in India are nothing more than talkers, not doers. This gets reflected in every sphere of life.
And they have been proclaiming 5000 years old civilization, greatest civilization, where as population is struggling to even meet two times a food in a day. People really here an aversion towards reaching on top, because, as I have said, males have no manliness in them now. They are impotent, and most of them are liberal, feminists types.
India has no future.
I understand that you are a Pakistani Hindu, and I am aware of the tragic situation for minorities over there. It's possible that you have not received Indian citizenship like many other Pakistani Hindu after many decades.
But that does not mean that you should vent your frustrations over here.
|
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Oct 30, 2019 19:16:00 GMT
HEIRHEADS HAVE NO RIGHT TO EXIST Histwhorey. It never teaches the democratic fact that America defeated the British in two wars solely because the guillotine-fodder aristocratic system only used a tiny percentage of the nation's military-leadership talent. Andrew Jackson, who defeated Wellington's division, would have never been allowed to become even the lowest-ranked officer in the British army. This is the most important idea of all time, yet it never makes into books the ruling class allows to be published. India was an even worse enemy of talent; that's why the British easily overran a people who outnumbered the Redcoats 10,000 to 1. Don't be a mind-slave for what lying historians tell us about intraclass conflict causing the conquest. Those academic bookworms are pseudo-intellectual slaveboys of plutocratic parasites. They'll even admit, in cases that don't threaten their Masters, that when one class achieves sole power, it starts to fight within itself. The first famous example was the absolute birth-class supremacy that was achieved when the patricians murdered the Gracchi; the civil wars won by the first two Caesars were the inevitable result. The same happened in Korea, which lost its independence for the first time in 2,000 years because of crushing a peasant revolt in the late 19th Century.
This is what has been happening here. The last time when talent was recognized in India, when Chanakya arose and collapsed a corrupt empire. And after this, greeks were driven out, because people were recognized based on their working potential, not through hereditary of castes
Ever since the rejected aryan druhuyus or dravida people have taken over, especially since the arrival of advaita philosopher, everything has gone in disarray here. They have completely anihilated entire working potential of people and this is the reason that why everyone accepts slavery happily here, because, even if you are capable to fight it out, your family members will not help you, will try to push you down.
To make matters worse, there's an aversion against working here. People think it's a disgrace to do a work, and everyone just want to get that aristocratic class positions.
The ruling classes themselves push this more, because, it ensures, that their corruption remains intact, because, how many people in India would even dissent? Those who stand up also, they just end up being loners.
Most of the people in India are nothing more than talkers, not doers. This gets reflected in every sphere of life.
And they have been proclaiming 5000 years old civilization, greatest civilization, where as population is struggling to even meet two times a food in a day. People really here an aversion towards reaching on top, because, as I have said, males have no manliness in them now. They are impotent, and most of them are liberal, feminists types.
India has no future.
Ever since the 1960s, led by the worthless brats whose fathers got rich after World War II, the formerly United States has been sinking under the same unAmerican class structure. Humiliated and excluded from childhood on, people don't have the guts to unionize and stand up to the entitled Scrooges. So they take it out on one another, always bickering and bossing around. |
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Oct 30, 2019 19:30:40 GMT
HEIRHEADS HAVE NO RIGHT TO EXIST Histwhorey. It never teaches the democratic fact that America defeated the British in two wars solely because the guillotine-fodder aristocratic system only used a tiny percentage of the nation's military-leadership talent. Andrew Jackson, who defeated Wellington's division, would have never been allowed to become even the lowest-ranked officer in the British army. This is the most important idea of all time, yet it never makes into books the ruling class allows to be published. India was an even worse enemy of talent; that's why the British easily overran a people who outnumbered the Redcoats 10,000 to 1. Don't be a mind-slave for what lying historians tell us about intraclass conflict causing the conquest. Those academic bookworms are pseudo-intellectual slaveboys of plutocratic parasites. They'll even admit, in cases that don't threaten their Masters, that when one class achieves sole power, it starts to fight within itself. The first famous example was the absolute birth-class supremacy that was achieved when the patricians murdered the Gracchi; the civil wars won by the first two Caesars were the inevitable result. The same happened in Korea, which lost its independence for the first time in 2,000 years because of crushing a peasant revolt in the late 19th Century.
This is what has been happening here. The last time when talent was recognized in India, when Chanakya arose and collapsed a corrupt empire. And after this, greeks were driven out, because people were recognized based on their working potential, not through hereditary of castes
Ever since the rejected aryan druhuyus or dravida people have taken over, especially since the arrival of advaita philosopher, everything has gone in disarray here. They have completely anihilated entire working potential of people and this is the reason that why everyone accepts slavery happily here, because, even if you are capable to fight it out, your family members will not help you, will try to push you down.
To make matters worse, there's an aversion against working here. People think it's a disgrace to do a work, and everyone just want to get that aristocratic class positions.
The ruling classes themselves push this more, because, it ensures, that their corruption remains intact, because, how many people in India would even dissent? Those who stand up also, they just end up being loners.
Most of the people in India are nothing more than talkers, not doers. This gets reflected in every sphere of life.
And they have been proclaiming 5000 years old civilization, greatest civilization, where as population is struggling to even meet two times a food in a day. People really here an aversion towards reaching on top, because, as I have said, males have no manliness in them now. They are impotent, and most of them are liberal, feminists types.
India has no future.
The aristocrats' boarding schools and universities are the cradle of Communism, which appeals to a class of people who've been told by its fathers that it was born to rule. It has been a fraud from the beginning; discussing its insincere ideology distracts from the prosecution of its participants. The only thing that should be debated with them is the terms of their surrender. After the French Revolution, inheritarians were terrified that their unearned birth privileges would be abolished by a populist takeover, so some of them decided that the best strategy for survival would be to take over the democratic movements and betray them into a dictatorship run by their own spoiled and bossy clique. This took advantage of the remnants of slavish worship of the glitter and charisma of the young lords, the Prince Charmings, the Camelot dungheap. There is no such thing as "rich kids on our side"; such an idea is political suicide. |
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Oct 30, 2019 19:49:31 GMT
lamburk"Most of the people in India are nothing more than talkers, not doers. This gets reflected in every sphere of life. And they have been proclaiming 5000 years old civilization, greatest civilization, where as population is struggling to even meet two times a food in a day. People really here an aversion towards reaching on top, because, as I have said, males have no manliness in them now. They are impotent, and most of them are liberal, feminists types. India has no future." Humanity has its future. It's always the same. The clue to all of our problems is nearly here - right behind our minds. It's just so obviously plain that we cannot even glance at it. I'm talking about the unique phenomena of human life. When and where did it start? Yesterday? The day before yesterday? That day when a human did start to speak? Or at the day he started to write? Where is that point? It really doesn't matter. All that is matter is the phenomena of life itself. It shew itself through our history, glancing and pulsating brightly during many weird and beautiful moments in it. If humanity should die, why would we bother about it? All the dead men would come from their tombs alive and well; either reborn, or as their own thin bodies - the life would give this chance again. It must be this way, or why on Earth the Nature has given us all of this?!
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2019 3:47:58 GMT
This is what has been happening here. The last time when talent was recognized in India, when Chanakya arose and collapsed a corrupt empire. And after this, greeks were driven out, because people were recognized based on their working potential, not through hereditary of castes
Ever since the rejected aryan druhuyus or dravida people have taken over, especially since the arrival of advaita philosopher, everything has gone in disarray here. They have completely anihilated entire working potential of people and this is the reason that why everyone accepts slavery happily here, because, even if you are capable to fight it out, your family members will not help you, will try to push you down.
To make matters worse, there's an aversion against working here. People think it's a disgrace to do a work, and everyone just want to get that aristocratic class positions.
The ruling classes themselves push this more, because, it ensures, that their corruption remains intact, because, how many people in India would even dissent? Those who stand up also, they just end up being loners.
Most of the people in India are nothing more than talkers, not doers. This gets reflected in every sphere of life.
And they have been proclaiming 5000 years old civilization, greatest civilization, where as population is struggling to even meet two times a food in a day. People really here an aversion towards reaching on top, because, as I have said, males have no manliness in them now. They are impotent, and most of them are liberal, feminists types.
India has no future.
Ever since the 1960s, led by the worthless brats whose fathers got rich after World War II, the formerly United States has been sinking under the same unAmerican class structure. Humiliated and excluded from childhood on, people don't have the guts to unionize and stand up to the entitled Scrooges. So they take it out on one another, always bickering and bossing around.
BINGO!!!
These people got money without putting any effort, but of course, they don't know how to utilize it and then, greed took over.
They thought that they can take on the world by using the might of money alone.
This is becoming a world wide phenomenon, of course, america is the one which showed the way, and now, even India is catching up with the same.
However, India still has it's caste issue intact.
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2019 3:51:18 GMT
This is what has been happening here. The last time when talent was recognized in India, when Chanakya arose and collapsed a corrupt empire. And after this, greeks were driven out, because people were recognized based on their working potential, not through hereditary of castes
Ever since the rejected aryan druhuyus or dravida people have taken over, especially since the arrival of advaita philosopher, everything has gone in disarray here. They have completely anihilated entire working potential of people and this is the reason that why everyone accepts slavery happily here, because, even if you are capable to fight it out, your family members will not help you, will try to push you down.
To make matters worse, there's an aversion against working here. People think it's a disgrace to do a work, and everyone just want to get that aristocratic class positions.
The ruling classes themselves push this more, because, it ensures, that their corruption remains intact, because, how many people in India would even dissent? Those who stand up also, they just end up being loners.
Most of the people in India are nothing more than talkers, not doers. This gets reflected in every sphere of life.
And they have been proclaiming 5000 years old civilization, greatest civilization, where as population is struggling to even meet two times a food in a day. People really here an aversion towards reaching on top, because, as I have said, males have no manliness in them now. They are impotent, and most of them are liberal, feminists types.
India has no future.
The aristocrats' boarding schools and universities are the cradle of Communism, which appeals to a class of people who've been told by its fathers that it was born to rule. It has been a fraud from the beginning; discussing its insincere ideology distracts from the prosecution of its participants. The only thing that should be debated with them is the terms of their surrender. After the French Revolution, inheritarians were terrified that their unearned birth privileges would be abolished by a populist takeover, so some of them decided that the best strategy for survival would be to take over the democratic movements and betray them into a dictatorship run by their own spoiled and bossy clique. This took advantage of the remnants of slavish worship of the glitter and charisma of the young lords, the Prince Charmings, the Camelot dungheap. There is no such thing as "rich kids on our side"; such an idea is political suicide.
The goal of any father or society of those who belong to aristocracy is to ensure that the empire which they have created through corruption, exploitation etc remains intact, and they start corrupting their young ones from the little age.
And the money to such creamy universities are sponsored by these people, and they hire those professor within their select group, so they would teach that only.
But if you see, a rich person would support a rich person only!!!
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2019 3:54:57 GMT
lamburk "Most of the people in India are nothing more than talkers, not doers. This gets reflected in every sphere of life. And they have been proclaiming 5000 years old civilization, greatest civilization, where as population is struggling to even meet two times a food in a day. People really here an aversion towards reaching on top, because, as I have said, males have no manliness in them now. They are impotent, and most of them are liberal, feminists types. India has no future." Humanity has its future. It's always the same.
The clue to all of our problems is nearly here - right behind our minds. It's just so obviously plain that we cannot even glance at it. I'm talking about the unique phenomena of human life. When and where did it start? Yesterday? The day before yesterday? That day when a human did start to speak? Or at the day he started to write? Where is that point? It really doesn't matter. All that is matter is the phenomena of life itself. It shew itself through our history, glancing and pulsating brightly during many weird and beautiful moments in it. If humanity should die, why would we bother about it? All the dead men would come from their tombs alive and well; either reborn, or as their own thin bodies - the life would give this chance again. It must be this way, or why on Earth the Nature has given us all of this?!
Humanithy has it's future if the LAW OF NATURE AND RIGHTEOUSNESS is upheld, which at present, only some people carry on. It always has been like this that JUST PEOPLE are ABHORRED even by their OWN CLASSES, who are CORRUPT, but POWER MAKES PEOPLE HUNGRY.
It's rather strange that who are aware about RULING AND JUST AND RIGHTEOUSNESS are always ELIMINATED by their OWN BREED, which in turn results into FRATRICIDE OF THEIR CLANS, ETHNICITY, CIVLIZATION.
It's NOT foreign invasions which destroys a race, but rather the power hungry people of the own civilization!!!!
At present, we are at the stage of DOOM, that's the KARMIC CYCLE.
Humans were supposed to RESPECT NATURE, NOT EXPLOIT IT FOR THEIR OWN MATERIALISTIC COMFORTS!!!
In fact, even females are part of this MOTHER EARTH, BUT NOW, THEY ARE VIEWED WITH OBJECT OF COMFORT
What is the need of hour is TOXIC MASCULINITY, males uphelding their MANLINESS, CHIVALRY AND GALLANTRY, not impotency, not escaping and surrendering meekishly
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2019 7:36:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Nov 1, 2019 23:26:44 GMT
lamburk "Most of the people in India are nothing more than talkers, not doers. This gets reflected in every sphere of life. And they have been proclaiming 5000 years old civilization, greatest civilization, where as population is struggling to even meet two times a food in a day. People really here an aversion towards reaching on top, because, as I have said, males have no manliness in them now. They are impotent, and most of them are liberal, feminists types. India has no future." Humanity has its future. It's always the same.
The clue to all of our problems is nearly here - right behind our minds. It's just so obviously plain that we cannot even glance at it. I'm talking about the unique phenomena of human life. When and where did it start? Yesterday? The day before yesterday? That day when a human did start to speak? Or at the day he started to write? Where is that point? It really doesn't matter. All that is matter is the phenomena of life itself. It shew itself through our history, glancing and pulsating brightly during many weird and beautiful moments in it. If humanity should die, why would we bother about it? All the dead men would come from their tombs alive and well; either reborn, or as their own thin bodies - the life would give this chance again. It must be this way, or why on Earth the Nature has given us all of this?!
Humanithy has it's future if the LAW OF NATURE AND RIGHTEOUSNESS is upheld, which at present, only some people carry on. It always has been like this that JUST PEOPLE are ABHORRED even by their OWN CLASSES, who are CORRUPT, but POWER MAKES PEOPLE HUNGRY.
It's rather strange that who are aware about RULING AND JUST AND RIGHTEOUSNESS are always ELIMINATED by their OWN BREED, which in turn results into FRATRICIDE OF THEIR CLANS, ETHNICITY, CIVLIZATION.
It's NOT foreign invasions which destroys a race, but rather the power hungry people of the own civilization!!!!
At present, we are at the stage of DOOM, that's the KARMIC CYCLE.
Humans were supposed to RESPECT NATURE, NOT EXPLOIT IT FOR THEIR OWN MATERIALISTIC COMFORTS!!!
In fact, even females are part of this MOTHER EARTH, BUT NOW, THEY ARE VIEWED WITH OBJECT OF COMFORT
What is the need of hour is TOXIC MASCULINITY, males uphelding their MANLINESS, CHIVALRY AND GALLANTRY, not impotency, not escaping and surrendering meekishly
Yeah, I agree on that, 'cause I feel the same. I'd say it's an act of intuition. a. I agree that we're still living in class-divided societies, and the law of non-equality is well-staged almost everywhere. Moreover, the violence of the law of equality is ruining by very plain and too disgusting selfish reasons. Because of that many people cannot do even their primary and basic necessities. That's why we must reject such a way of society running by reconstructing it to something more stable and beauty. b. Killing breed. Ethnic. You know, I'd like to share this view, because locally it works: some countries have no respect to people who don't like them. But in global view I don't think it would be useful; it historic perspective - from the beginning till the end of the cycle of reincarnations - humanity lives by their own primal rage sources though. c. Ecology has two sides of it. I like to think that Ecology must run this show, but at the same time I can't object human powerful intellectual potential that allowed us to decrease many Nature's evil revealings like Natural disasters: thunders, lightnings, tsunamies, winds, etc. My point of view on it is: I can't refuse that the Nature is the source of all of the things we know, so without its supporting we're dead.
At the same time I'd like to add: There's no way to go know nothing about "how this or that thing works".So, I guess it should start being obvious that we do need both sides of using resources. d. Oh, yes. The mainly painful problem, maybe the most painful problems I've ever stacked before. I do not share this feministic priorities and do not think that they should exist at all. Females are just killing slowly themselves by start being more masculine. This is a part of "Progressivism" program; it means they left the importance of the other side of that coin - a coin of Ecology I've previously talked about it. You know, please, do not be upset. The world isn't without good, decent people, and you are one of them! Good luck! |
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2019 3:12:50 GMT
Humanithy has it's future if the LAW OF NATURE AND RIGHTEOUSNESS is upheld, which at present, only some people carry on. It always has been like this that JUST PEOPLE are ABHORRED even by their OWN CLASSES, who are CORRUPT, but POWER MAKES PEOPLE HUNGRY.
It's rather strange that who are aware about RULING AND JUST AND RIGHTEOUSNESS are always ELIMINATED by their OWN BREED, which in turn results into FRATRICIDE OF THEIR CLANS, ETHNICITY, CIVLIZATION.
It's NOT foreign invasions which destroys a race, but rather the power hungry people of the own civilization!!!!
At present, we are at the stage of DOOM, that's the KARMIC CYCLE.
Humans were supposed to RESPECT NATURE, NOT EXPLOIT IT FOR THEIR OWN MATERIALISTIC COMFORTS!!!
In fact, even females are part of this MOTHER EARTH, BUT NOW, THEY ARE VIEWED WITH OBJECT OF COMFORT
What is the need of hour is TOXIC MASCULINITY, males uphelding their MANLINESS, CHIVALRY AND GALLANTRY, not impotency, not escaping and surrendering meekishly
Yeah, I agree on that, 'cause I feel the same. I'd say it's an act of intuition. a. I agree that we're still living in class-divided societies, and the law of non-equality is well-staged almost everywhere. Moreover, the violence of the law of equality is ruining by very plain and too disgusting selfish reasons. Because of that many people cannot do even their primary and basic necessities. That's why we must reject such a way of society running by reconstructing it to something more stable and beauty. b. Killing breed. Ethnic. You know, I'd like to share this view, because locally it works: some countries have no respect to people who don't like them. But in global view I don't think it would be useful; it historic perspective - from the beginning till the end of the cycle of reincarnations - humanity lives by their own primal rage sources though. c. Ecology has two sides of it. I like to think that Ecology must run this show, but at the same time I can't object human powerful intellectual potential that allowed us to decrease many Nature's evil revealings like Natural disasters: thunders, lightnings, tsunamies, winds, etc. My point of view on it is: I can't refuse that the Nature is the source of all of the things we know, so without its supporting we're dead.
At the same time I'd like to add: There's no way to go know nothing about "how this or that thing works".So, I guess it should start being obvious that we do need both sides of using resources. d. Oh, yes. The mainly painful problem, maybe the most painful problems I've ever stacked before. I do not share this feministic priorities and do not think that they should exist at all. Females are just killing slowly themselves by start being more masculine. This is a part of "Progressivism" program; it means they left the importance of the other side of that coin - a coin of Ecology I've previously talked about it. You know, please, do not be upset. The world isn't without good, decent people, and you are one of them! Good luck!
a. Classes actually are based on one's on potential. However, some feudal lords who are power hungry turn them into HEREDIATARY. This problem was in EUROPE also, especially during tzarist viking russia. But, class are nothing more than one's potential and productive abilities. It's a wonderful system because people can stand up based on their SKILLS instead of depending on the government to provide jobs, which has limitations.
b. This is something which even I concur now. Actually , what happens when an invading male group capture a terrirtory, they look for only two things - LANDS AND GIRLS. And they BREED with girls to produce off spring. The off springs of these off springs start thinking that they always have been NATIVES of that land ,and forget the true history that they themselves are B#$#$# PROGENY in the eyes of their own people. Even I call myself a B#$, and I cannot deny this fact because my ancestors have migrated out of somewhere, and bred with girls.
c. Nature has it's own way of taking revenge.
d. Two things, one, males are not behaving like males now. Second, males don't respect females the way females want to be treated. That's why all this mess.
|
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2019 4:38:40 GMT
eugeneIdea of India itself is non sensical, it's actually british who designed it. And to make matters worse, the post british polity did not anything good either. What they did was mythology, and have been making false proclamation that sanskrit is the national language, whereas, the language which became sanskrit was brought by a particular tribes of aryan society, related with central asia. This is where these people end up losing. There political system is based on false assumption, mythologies, and not on reality and facts. Similary, the aryan texts have ample references of cattle sacrifices, beef eating, and other such flesh eating activities, but the founding fathers have denounced everything. They even say non violence, where as, vedic literatures are filled with gory battles. The ruling classes were headed by mercantile minded people, and they just wanted to exploit everything, so fooled the common man here. And India has regressed a lot now in the past 60 years.
|
|
