|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Sept 27, 2019 11:59:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jonbain on Sept 30, 2019 10:32:10 GMT
Their so-called models are not just weak, they contradict themselves in so many ways. Firstly most stars form binary pairs, and none of their models explain this effectively. So to have a fairly large planet in orbit is just half way between a solar system like ours and a binary pair of stars like the major pair in the Alpha Centauri binary. Any type of solar system with any planetary sizes can easily form when one of the stars in a binary pair go nova. This is why the planets are mostly on an ecliptic plane orbiting in a uniform direction with orbits that are mostly circular. (Comets form differently). None of their models explains the existing solar system at all. Only this God-given model for which I am the messenger actually works. Try this video based on my evolutionary gravity algorithms: If you prefer to read the article, and also want to experiment with these free algorithms, then try this link: www.flight-light-and-spin.com/how-solar-system-formed.htmOf course, there is one still crucial question: How do binary stars form?
|
|
|
Post by thesageofmainstreet on Sept 30, 2019 21:19:18 GMT
These Lying Geeks Never Admit That These Discoveries Disprove Their Basic Theoretical DogmasThat happens a lot, proving that physics is still a primitive science. What's worse, desperately lonely nerds believe in it.
|
|