|
Post by Polaris on Jun 29, 2019 1:44:05 GMT
where does the line between accomodating others and being abused by others lie?
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Jun 29, 2019 2:03:47 GMT
I would say when it starts to feel like you're being taken advantage of that it's abuse. Accommodation must be given when you feel like you want. Abuse is when you feel like you need to now.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jun 29, 2019 5:32:24 GMT
Oh... not an easy question. Lots depends on how we understand people, how we measure our relation to them in general.
My opinion on this: As long as I don't believe in people, I don't trust 'em all. So, I'm afraid of people and try not to allow them to stay long in my apartment (if we're talking about hospitality). It's more easy to prevent something, rather than repair it after.
That's why I think that abusing by someone is a horrible nightmare. We need to trust no one; nobody's perfect, and even a good person can cause danger. Just do not deal with people, and you'll be living like in heavens.
|
|
|
Post by Polaris on Jun 29, 2019 10:12:38 GMT
I would say when it starts to feel like you're being taken advantage of that it's abuse. Accommodation must be given when you feel like you want. Abuse is when you feel like you need to now. The price for accomodating others is usually being taken advantage of (willingly). As a leader of this group you may try to accomodate group members whose behavior is abusive.
|
|
|
Post by Polaris on Jun 29, 2019 10:19:53 GMT
Oh... not an easy question. Lots depends on how we understand people, how we measure our relation to them in general. My opinion on this: As long as I don't believe in people, I don't trust 'em all. So, I'm afraid of people and try not to allow them to stay long in my apartment (if we're talking about hospitality). It's more easy to prevent something, rather than repair it after. That's why I think that abusing by someone is a horrible nightmare. We need to trust no one; nobody's perfect, and even a good person can cause danger. Just do not deal with people, and you'll be living like in heavens. what about the supposition that people are not perfect and that the same person may display both favorable and unfavorable aspects and you need to take that all or you choose to live alone.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jun 29, 2019 14:24:02 GMT
Oh... not an easy question. Lots depends on how we understand people, how we measure our relation to them in general. My opinion on this: As long as I don't believe in people, I don't trust 'em all. So, I'm afraid of people and try not to allow them to stay long in my apartment (if we're talking about hospitality). It's more easy to prevent something, rather than repair it after. That's why I think that abusing by someone is a horrible nightmare. We need to trust no one; nobody's perfect, and even a good person can cause danger. Just do not deal with people, and you'll be living like in heavens. what about the supposition that people are not perfect and that the same person may display both favorable and unfavorable aspects and you need to take that all or you choose to live alone. I'd like to live alone, but I don't think it is possible at all. People are struggle with each other because of tiny pieces of territory, because of "not right sight", because of greedy, love, etc. There are tons of reasons, and without any doubt people will find triple more - to take something form you, or to abuse you. Living alone is the biggest wish of mine. However, "living alone" doesn't mean "misanthropy", or "hating people", or even "having no relations with them". In my opinion, living alone is having merely a balanced conversation with people. We don't need talk too much, or keep quiet all the time. It is very good that a person is able to differ favorable from not favorable sides from another one. Coincidentally, now I'm writing an article about finding a property in an object with and without conceptualization of it. This principle might lay down in ability of differentiation "favorable" from "unfavorable" things in a human. And what is the most interesting - we cannot do it without a conceptualization. The more complex results we want to get, the more conceptualization requires. What may it gives to the answer on your question? The answer in Socratic style: being good persons we are able to differ various sides of a person. What to do - depends on what future we want. Future is something that supposes to be seen clearly unless we don't care about it. Being care for future is to make it clearer as well as well balanced.
|
|