|
Post by Lone Wanderer on Jun 17, 2019 10:24:09 GMT
Pedophiles Believe They Should Be A Part Of The LGBT CommunityPedophiles are rebranding themselves as “MAPs” or “Minor Attracted Persons” in an effort to gain acceptance and be included into the LGBT community, according to several reports from LGBT news sites. According to Urban Dictionary, the blanket term MAP includes infantophiles (infants), pedophiles (pre-pubescent children), hebephiles (pubescent children), and ephebophiles (post-pubescent children). Some MAPs also refer to themselves as NOMAPs or “Non-Offending Minor Attracted Persons”. These pedophiles seek to be a part of the LGBT+ community, even going so far as to make a “Pride” flag for Gay Pride Month. The “MAP/NOMAP community” tries to pull at people’s heartstrings by claiming that pedophiles are misunderstood marginalized people, and that as long as their attraction to children is not acted upon — or in some cases when they get permission from the child — that they should not be villainized. Many blogs exist on Tumblr showing support for MAPs, claiming that they should be a part of the LGBT community and attempting to create “safe spaces” for these “minor attracted persons”. The blog “Pedophiles about Pedophilia” also presents many sob stories of “marginalized” pedophiles in pretty pastel colors, claiming that they mean no harm and just want to be loved like everyone else as shown in such headlines as “Why Pedophilia And Pedophiles Are Not A Risk To Children”, “Growing Up A Pedophile” and “How I came out as an anti-contact pedophile to the woman I love”. This name change seems to follow in the liberal trend of rebranding things by giving them more “politically correct” names, but is the next step really normalizing pedophilia? dailycaller.com/2018/07/09/pedophiles-lgbt-community/
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jun 18, 2019 21:45:04 GMT
Could you choose what was pleasure, if you were a worm? Could you choose to be a man being a nothing? It's nothing, but logic tricks. There are lots typical of them. So what? If you were charged with "there's no stable sexuality now!" by commies or the same assholes, it didn't mean you had got the truth. It merely means you've been loaded with fairy tales. I don't believe in leftists fairy tales as well as sjw's and feminazi's ones. You are making precisely ZERO sense. I have no idea what you are trying to get across here; none. Just ask yourself the question. When did you CHOOSE to be heterosexual? What is your answer? Just imagine you were a worm. And being a worm, did you have any understanding of what was pleasure, what kind of thing it was? Being nothing: there's no way to decide something. We did not decide who we were, where we were born, and when we were born. This is a choice of our parents. We all live 2gether: any decisions of our neighbours are ours too. You cannot be sure are you the same one today as yesterday without any other people. They make us being us; and we make them being them. I did not choose to be heterosexual as well as I did not choose to be born a man. And no one of us did not choose to create of not to create this world with its laws: the binary laws of sex.
|
|
sculptor
Full Member
Posts: 121
Likes: 20
Meta-Ethnicity: Homonid
Ethnicity: Sapiens Sapiens
Country: United Kingdon of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Region: South
Location: Brighton
Ancestry: Homo Sapiens
Taxonomy: Mammalian
mtDNA: From mt EVE
Politics: Left
Religion: None
Relationship Status: MYOB
Hero: My Grandmother
Age: too old
Philosophy: Always
|
Post by sculptor on Jun 19, 2019 7:54:38 GMT
You are making precisely ZERO sense. I have no idea what you are trying to get across here; none. Just ask yourself the question. When did you CHOOSE to be heterosexual? What is your answer? Just imagine you were a worm. And being a worm, did you have any understanding of what was pleasure, what kind of thing it was? Being nothing: there's no way to decide something. We did not decide who we were, where we were born, and when we were born. This is a choice of our parents. We all live 2gether: any decisions of our neighbours are ours too. You cannot be sure are you the same one today as yesterday without any other people. They make us being us; and we make them being them. I did not choose to be heterosexual as well as I did not choose to be born a man. And no one of us did not choose to create of not to create this world with its laws: the binary laws of sex. There is no binary law of sex. That much is obvious. Homosexuality is perfectly natural and has been identified in thousands of animal species. Mostly mammals, but also birds and amphibians. Of course the plant kingdom does not have a binary sex law either, with many plants being neuter, others able to change sex, and others being hermaphrodite. Some of the most common plants species such as hemp can have examples which are male, female or both. Dogs and cats are most commonly observed since they are in our homes, to have sex with their own gender.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jun 19, 2019 23:55:01 GMT
Just imagine you were a worm. And being a worm, did you have any understanding of what was pleasure, what kind of thing it was? Being nothing: there's no way to decide something. We did not decide who we were, where we were born, and when we were born. This is a choice of our parents. We all live 2gether: any decisions of our neighbours are ours too. You cannot be sure are you the same one today as yesterday without any other people. They make us being us; and we make them being them. I did not choose to be heterosexual as well as I did not choose to be born a man. And no one of us did not choose to create of not to create this world with its laws: the binary laws of sex. There is no binary law of sex. That much is obvious. Homosexuality is perfectly natural and has been identified in thousands of animal species. Mostly mammals, but also birds and amphibians. Of course the plant kingdom does not have a binary sex law either, with many plants being neuter, others able to change sex, and others being hermaphrodite. Some of the most common plants species such as hemp can have examples which are male, female or both. Dogs and cats are most commonly observed since they are in our homes, to have sex with their own gender. There is one undoubtedly perfect, clear, beautiful, extravagant, delicious, tasty and crystal law of sex - is our will to prolong our lives raising children. This law was used milliards of times. There is no objections to it. No one. Examples of homo in any species as well as in different cultures (the Ancient Greece, Emperor's Japan, etc) aren't good in their anti-argument against prolonging a life of humanity. Maybe I didn't choose sexuality, and maybe a culture had big influence to it. So what? The law of surviving, the law of creating another life is much more powerful against any form of pervercy. And why do we call some weird sexuality as pervert forms? Be-cause it is not the way to continue our life. This is really important, I beg you to hear it: any forms of sexuality are possible and there's no global objections to it. - A specie can do anything possible to do for it; but for what? - This "for what" is more important, than anything. Usually we understand it being too old, to reverse time back. All the humanity is hurrying somewhere. If they were not, all the kinds of sexuality would be as good as any other; or - there would be no objections to those forms, if we weren't mortal. Mortality and the other things (e.g. climate, chemical conditions) hold many other types of preferences. I'd say this was a key to understand why binary sex (not sexuality) had been living for many years, because it was one of the best types of living systems our living nature could use. And - this means that sexes are products of the nature. The nature must be responsible for such separations. It's likely that homosexuality as well as heterosexuality has no place at all. The nature divide them as such sexes, and our thinking that homosexuality was correct while heterosexuality wasn't correct (or even that all of them were possible) must be on the wrong way. As long as the purpose of life isn't defined, there's no point to going to find the answer on this question.
|
|
|
Post by cynicsanonymous on Jun 20, 2019 2:13:33 GMT
There is no binary law of sex. That much is obvious. Homosexuality is perfectly natural and has been identified in thousands of animal species. Mostly mammals, but also birds and amphibians. Of course the plant kingdom does not have a binary sex law either, with many plants being neuter, others able to change sex, and others being hermaphrodite. Some of the most common plants species such as hemp can have examples which are male, female or both. Dogs and cats are most commonly observed since they are in our homes, to have sex with their own gender. There is one undoubtedly perfect, clear, beautiful, extravagant, delicious, tasty and crystal law of sex - is our will to prolong our lives raising children. This law was used milliards of times. There is no objections to it. No one. Examples of homo in any species as well as in different cultures (the Ancient Greece, Emperor's Japan, etc) aren't good in their anti-argument against prolonging a life of humanity. Maybe I didn't choose sexuality, and maybe a culture had big influence to it. So what? The law of surviving, the law of creating another life is much more powerful against any form of pervercy. And why do we call some weird sexuality as pervert forms? Be-cause it is not the way to continue our life. This is really important, I beg you to hear it: any forms of sexuality are possible and there's no global objections to it. - A specie can do anything possible to do for it; but for what? - This "for what" is more important, than anything. Usually we understand it being too old, to reverse time back. All the humanity is hurrying somewhere. If they were not, all the kinds of sexuality would be as good as any other; or - there would be no objections to those forms, if we weren't mortal. Mortality and the other things (e.g. climate, chemical conditions) hold many other types of preferences. I'd say this was a key to understand why binary sex (not sexuality) had been living for many years, because it was one of the best types of living systems our living nature could use. And - this means that sexes are products of the nature. The nature must be responsible for such separations. It's likely that homosexuality as well as heterosexuality has no place at all. The nature divide them as such sexes, and our thinking that homosexuality was correct while heterosexuality wasn't correct (or even that all of them were possible) must be on the wrong way. As long as the purpose of life isn't defined, there's no point to going to find the answer on this question. hosexuality is a disorder but is a natural disorder non the less. You make a mistake by thinking nature is pro-life, Nature its known to control population in unorthodox ways like mass suicide etc.
|
|
sculptor
Full Member
Posts: 121
Likes: 20
Meta-Ethnicity: Homonid
Ethnicity: Sapiens Sapiens
Country: United Kingdon of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Region: South
Location: Brighton
Ancestry: Homo Sapiens
Taxonomy: Mammalian
mtDNA: From mt EVE
Politics: Left
Religion: None
Relationship Status: MYOB
Hero: My Grandmother
Age: too old
Philosophy: Always
|
Post by sculptor on Jun 20, 2019 7:16:49 GMT
There is no binary law of sex. That much is obvious. Homosexuality is perfectly natural and has been identified in thousands of animal species. Mostly mammals, but also birds and amphibians. Of course the plant kingdom does not have a binary sex law either, with many plants being neuter, others able to change sex, and others being hermaphrodite. Some of the most common plants species such as hemp can have examples which are male, female or both. Dogs and cats are most commonly observed since they are in our homes, to have sex with their own gender. There is one undoubtedly perfect, clear, beautiful, extravagant, delicious, tasty and crystal law of sex - is our will to prolong our lives raising children. ... As long as the purpose of life isn't defined, there's no point to going to find the answer on this question. There are already far too many people on the earth, and you personally hold ideas that run counter to common sense, and the preservation of the species. You've failed to address my points, and have no answer to the most simple empirical observations. You are always going to have trouble when you only have one out-of-date book to use as a reference.
|
|
icebear
New Member
Posts: 20
Likes: 12
|
Post by icebear on Jun 20, 2019 10:24:24 GMT
No. The next step is capriphiles/capriphilia.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jun 20, 2019 17:58:51 GMT
There is one undoubtedly perfect, clear, beautiful, extravagant, delicious, tasty and crystal law of sex - is our will to prolong our lives raising children. This law was used milliards of times. There is no objections to it. No one. Examples of homo in any species as well as in different cultures (the Ancient Greece, Emperor's Japan, etc) aren't good in their anti-argument against prolonging a life of humanity. Maybe I didn't choose sexuality, and maybe a culture had big influence to it. So what? The law of surviving, the law of creating another life is much more powerful against any form of pervercy. And why do we call some weird sexuality as pervert forms? Be-cause it is not the way to continue our life. This is really important, I beg you to hear it: any forms of sexuality are possible and there's no global objections to it. - A specie can do anything possible to do for it; but for what? - This "for what" is more important, than anything. Usually we understand it being too old, to reverse time back. All the humanity is hurrying somewhere. If they were not, all the kinds of sexuality would be as good as any other; or - there would be no objections to those forms, if we weren't mortal. Mortality and the other things (e.g. climate, chemical conditions) hold many other types of preferences. I'd say this was a key to understand why binary sex (not sexuality) had been living for many years, because it was one of the best types of living systems our living nature could use. And - this means that sexes are products of the nature. The nature must be responsible for such separations. It's likely that homosexuality as well as heterosexuality has no place at all. The nature divide them as such sexes, and our thinking that homosexuality was correct while heterosexuality wasn't correct (or even that all of them were possible) must be on the wrong way. As long as the purpose of life isn't defined, there's no point to going to find the answer on this question. hosexuality is a disorder but is a natural disorder non the less. You make a mistake by thinking nature is pro-life, Nature its known to control population in unorthodox ways like mass suicide etc. Yes. I agree. I was wrong; as you said, the nature is on its own. Any of such force should've been taken as blind forces, not consciousness, except for Spinoza's nature or similar.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jun 20, 2019 18:44:42 GMT
There is one undoubtedly perfect, clear, beautiful, extravagant, delicious, tasty and crystal law of sex - is our will to prolong our lives raising children. ... As long as the purpose of life isn't defined, there's no point to going to find the answer on this question. There are already far too many people on the earth, and you personally hold ideas that run counter to common sense, and the preservation of the species. You've failed to address my points, and have no answer to the most simple empirical observations. You are always going to have trouble when you only have one out-of-date book to use as a reference. You're right, there are lots of examples about not heterosexuals kinds of love we can find in the nature. There's a book of O. Judson "Sex Advice to All Creations" that tells about such things. I don't know what empirical observations you're talking about? Honestly, I'm confused. As I said, yes, it is a common sense, and it's obvious that the most of the people are heterosexual. But why the common sense should be bad here? Heterosexuality is surely an accidental truth, not necessary one; no one can say that we must be heterosexual. As an accidental truth, it's a type of cultural relationship. However, this type of relationship was proved itself during the history. Ok, maybe I went somewhere wrong, and had lost the line of the discussion, but if you wouldn't mind answer on a couple of questions: Why this is so important for people to know about homosexuality now? Isn't this knowledge able to be dangerous for a society?
|
|
sculptor
Full Member
Posts: 121
Likes: 20
Meta-Ethnicity: Homonid
Ethnicity: Sapiens Sapiens
Country: United Kingdon of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Region: South
Location: Brighton
Ancestry: Homo Sapiens
Taxonomy: Mammalian
mtDNA: From mt EVE
Politics: Left
Religion: None
Relationship Status: MYOB
Hero: My Grandmother
Age: too old
Philosophy: Always
|
Post by sculptor on Jun 20, 2019 22:15:16 GMT
There are already far too many people on the earth, and you personally hold ideas that run counter to common sense, and the preservation of the species. You've failed to address my points, and have no answer to the most simple empirical observations. You are always going to have trouble when you only have one out-of-date book to use as a reference. You're right, there are lots of examples about not heterosexuals kinds of love we can find in the nature. There's a book of O. Judson "Sex Advice to All Creations" that tells about such things. I don't know what empirical observations you're talking about? Honestly, I'm confused. As I said, yes, it is a common sense, and it's obvious that the most of the people are heterosexual. But why the common sense should be bad here? Heterosexuality is surely an accidental truth, not necessary one; no one can say that we must be heterosexual. As an accidental truth, it's a type of cultural relationship. However, this type of relationship was proved itself during the history. Ok, maybe I went somewhere wrong, and had lost the line of the discussion, but if you wouldn't mind answer on a couple of questions: Why this is so important for people to know about homosexuality now? Isn't this knowledge able to be dangerous for a society? Why now? Because since the Catholic church condemned homosexuality, their lives have become made illegal, wretched, abused, imprisoned, vilified for 100s of years. It is only rather recently that homosexuality has become legal, and people have become free to express themselves as they wish and not as the church and the state has enforced upon them. It is now legal for same sex marriage, but there is still work to do to make differently gendered people safe from bigotry. It is thus important that children are informed about why some of their friends have two mums or two dads, and that this should not the the cause of bullying, or name calling. Why would you think any knowledge is dangerous. All knowledge enriches us.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jun 21, 2019 16:47:21 GMT
You're right, there are lots of examples about not heterosexuals kinds of love we can find in the nature. There's a book of O. Judson "Sex Advice to All Creations" that tells about such things. I don't know what empirical observations you're talking about? Honestly, I'm confused. As I said, yes, it is a common sense, and it's obvious that the most of the people are heterosexual. But why the common sense should be bad here? Heterosexuality is surely an accidental truth, not necessary one; no one can say that we must be heterosexual. As an accidental truth, it's a type of cultural relationship. However, this type of relationship was proved itself during the history. Ok, maybe I went somewhere wrong, and had lost the line of the discussion, but if you wouldn't mind answer on a couple of questions: Why this is so important for people to know about homosexuality now? Isn't this knowledge able to be dangerous for a society? Why now? Because since the Catholic church condemned homosexuality, their lives have become made illegal, wretched, abused, imprisoned, vilified for 100s of years. It is only rather recently that homosexuality has become legal, and people have become free to express themselves as they wish and not as the church and the state has enforced upon them. It is now legal for same sex marriage, but there is still work to do to make differently gendered people safe from bigotry. It is thus important that children are informed about why some of their friends have two mums or two dads, and that this should not the the cause of bullying, or name calling. Why would you think any knowledge is dangerous. All knowledge enriches us. Carrying a gun in schools is a cause for bullying too, just like having bad marks. And so what? This is a society behaviour style; it's been for centuries like that. And exactly this helped for society to grow and become what it looks like now. You proposed common arguments from liberal prospects. Their value is as the same as any other political screaming in mob. I see here no sense for society to stop using bullying. This is a good practice. And yes it can break child's mind, but a society does it just for goods. Expressing yourself is not so safe as you think. Maniacs are the ones who express themselves. We don't need to turn to them. But ok, there were lots of artists, sculptors, architects, poets, musicians, and philosophers who were homosexuals. Yes, it wouldn't be good if we spoiled good musicians or good poets just because of their "unlike the others" views. - However, now we don't need any of them. Today's society is completely tired of that modern art stupidness that has become almost a childish nightmares or smth. Refusing this this modern art is the best what we can do now. After trashing it the society will be able to live without any bigotry. As Freud told that many artists had problems with their behaviour ("Father-repressor", "sublimation", etc); and because of it now we know it as the artists.
|
|
sculptor
Full Member
Posts: 121
Likes: 20
Meta-Ethnicity: Homonid
Ethnicity: Sapiens Sapiens
Country: United Kingdon of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Region: South
Location: Brighton
Ancestry: Homo Sapiens
Taxonomy: Mammalian
mtDNA: From mt EVE
Politics: Left
Religion: None
Relationship Status: MYOB
Hero: My Grandmother
Age: too old
Philosophy: Always
|
Post by sculptor on Jun 22, 2019 16:32:35 GMT
Why now? Because since the Catholic church condemned homosexuality, their lives have become made illegal, wretched, abused, imprisoned, vilified for 100s of years. It is only rather recently that homosexuality has become legal, and people have become free to express themselves as they wish and not as the church and the state has enforced upon them. It is now legal for same sex marriage, but there is still work to do to make differently gendered people safe from bigotry. It is thus important that children are informed about why some of their friends have two mums or two dads, and that this should not the the cause of bullying, or name calling. Why would you think any knowledge is dangerous. All knowledge enriches us. Carrying a gun in schools is a cause for bullying too, just like having bad marks. And so what? This is a society behaviour style; it's been for centuries like that. And exactly this helped for society to grow and become what it looks like now. You proposed common arguments from liberal prospects. Their value is as the same as any other political screaming in mob. I see here no sense for society to stop using bullying. This is a good practice. And yes it can break child's mind, but a society does it just for goods. Expressing yourself is not so safe as you think. Maniacs are the ones who express themselves. We don't need to turn to them. But ok, there were lots of artists, sculptors, architects, poets, musicians, and philosophers who were homosexuals. Yes, it wouldn't be good if we spoiled good musicians or good poets just because of their "unlike the others" views. - However, now we don't need any of them. Today's society is completely tired of that modern art stupidness that has become almost a childish nightmares or smth. Refusing this this modern art is the best what we can do now. After trashing it the society will be able to live without any bigotry. As Freud told that many artists had problems with their behaviour ("Father-repressor", "sublimation", etc); and because of it now we know it as the artists. I think you might want to get a life! You wretched evil person.
|
|
|
Post by Eugene 2.0 on Jun 22, 2019 19:35:03 GMT
Carrying a gun in schools is a cause for bullying too, just like having bad marks. And so what? This is a society behaviour style; it's been for centuries like that. And exactly this helped for society to grow and become what it looks like now. You proposed common arguments from liberal prospects. Their value is as the same as any other political screaming in mob. I see here no sense for society to stop using bullying. This is a good practice. And yes it can break child's mind, but a society does it just for goods. Expressing yourself is not so safe as you think. Maniacs are the ones who express themselves. We don't need to turn to them. But ok, there were lots of artists, sculptors, architects, poets, musicians, and philosophers who were homosexuals. Yes, it wouldn't be good if we spoiled good musicians or good poets just because of their "unlike the others" views. - However, now we don't need any of them. Today's society is completely tired of that modern art stupidness that has become almost a childish nightmares or smth. Refusing this this modern art is the best what we can do now. After trashing it the society will be able to live without any bigotry. As Freud told that many artists had problems with their behaviour ("Father-repressor", "sublimation", etc); and because of it now we know it as the artists. I think you might want to get a life! You wretched evil person. Just try to stay out of such conclusions, alright? There's no need to rotate the discussion to "personalities" mode. If you have some ideas like this - teach yourself how not to express them rudely.
|
|
sculptor
Full Member
Posts: 121
Likes: 20
Meta-Ethnicity: Homonid
Ethnicity: Sapiens Sapiens
Country: United Kingdon of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Region: South
Location: Brighton
Ancestry: Homo Sapiens
Taxonomy: Mammalian
mtDNA: From mt EVE
Politics: Left
Religion: None
Relationship Status: MYOB
Hero: My Grandmother
Age: too old
Philosophy: Always
|
Post by sculptor on Jun 24, 2019 7:52:41 GMT
I think you might want to get a life! You wretched evil person. Just try to stay out of such conclusions, alright? There's no need to rotate the discussion to "personalities" mode. If you have some ideas like this - teach yourself how not to express them rudely. Your views are vile. If you want to be treated nicely, you should lean some basic respect for your fellow human beings. I am perfectly tolerant, but I have no tolerance for intolerance.
|
|
sculptor
Full Member
Posts: 121
Likes: 20
Meta-Ethnicity: Homonid
Ethnicity: Sapiens Sapiens
Country: United Kingdon of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Region: South
Location: Brighton
Ancestry: Homo Sapiens
Taxonomy: Mammalian
mtDNA: From mt EVE
Politics: Left
Religion: None
Relationship Status: MYOB
Hero: My Grandmother
Age: too old
Philosophy: Always
|
Post by sculptor on Jun 24, 2019 7:54:07 GMT
|
|
sculptor
Full Member
Posts: 121
Likes: 20
Meta-Ethnicity: Homonid
Ethnicity: Sapiens Sapiens
Country: United Kingdon of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Region: South
Location: Brighton
Ancestry: Homo Sapiens
Taxonomy: Mammalian
mtDNA: From mt EVE
Politics: Left
Religion: None
Relationship Status: MYOB
Hero: My Grandmother
Age: too old
Philosophy: Always
|
Post by sculptor on Jun 24, 2019 7:54:47 GMT
|
|