Would it be possible to have a conversation regarding the to

Could you not shove non-backed "information" down our throats? Last time I've heard, Trump was alright and so was Francis.

Also the left fucking sucks because I say so and the right might as well be descendants from heaven.

That's your evidence for Pope Francis being right wing? Protecting pedophiles? That is not a right wing principal at all or even a political one. If anything it's the left that's in favor of nontraditional proclivities. 

A BOY IS A MALE. A MAN THAT WANTS TO HAVE SEX WITH A BOY IS A HOMOSEXUAL.

I agree with your comments on Trump,
but as regards the church, you should reconsider.

I have closely studied some half dozen cases of alleged
abuse within Catholicism, and on every occasion, there was zero
concrete evidence for the conviction, even though the suspect was
found guilty. On each occasion, the judge simply preferred to
believe the word of a homosexual above that of a priest.

Now nobody can hope to study every single case in detail,
but on the basis of what I have looked at (as well as wider
cases of many other abuses outside church)  I can see a
systematic corruption of the legal process, such that it is
actually impossible to make any meaningful generalizations
about such broad affairs.

In fact, if you have a specific case, then you have something
reasonable to discuss. Conviction on the basis of opinions
and he-said-she-said pseudo-justice is little more than gossip.

In the case of Trump, the proof is of course, as solid as it gets.

I have found that homosexuals, however, are simply compulsive
liars. The church itself may be guilty of being less than Christian,
yes, and perhaps the false accusations against them have the 
ring of divine justice due to their own falsehoods. But that is no
excuse to perpetuate rumor and slander on the basis of opinion.

You didn't start this thread talking about issues. You stated that right wingers like Trump and Pope Francis (a very liberal Pope) sexually abuse people and protect pedophiles. I said that it was news to me that Pope Francis is right wing. You said that Pope Francis is right wing, "because the left doesn't protect pedophiles." I said that protecting pedophiles isn't a right wing ideal or even a political one and that if anything its the left that is in favor of non traditional proclivities and that is absolutely true. Now you are saying that my alleged statement that the left supports criminal activities is idiotic while starting your thread with a post basically stating that the right supports criminal activity which is the most ignorant, dead dead, partisan hack statement that I've ever read making me think that you're probably still in your teens.

Also, the left does protect predators and pedophiles. Hollywood, which is a leftist mono culture is one of the most notorious pedophile dens in the country as well as other crimes against women and children. I don't see Hollywood turning in their own for committing these crimes. In fact they still lionize people like Roman Polanski as some kind of hero. There's also Bill Clinton, a confirmed rapist and suspected pedophile defended viciously by the left among others. Pope Francis would also count as a left wing defender of pedophiles and there are many other examples. 

Nothing of what you said mentions ANY political issues only that allegedly some right wingers did some bad things. Well, some left wingers do horrible things as well; that doesn't make their ideas incorrect and it doesn't make every single person espousing left wing ideals evil. Nor does some right wingers doing bad things make right wing ideals incorrect or make all right wingers evil. These ideas must be tested through debate and policy experimentation to see if they are useful and if you are really going to paint all right wingers as evil because of crimes allegedly done by a few than it is you who are idiotic.