|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Nov 1, 2018 19:29:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on Nov 1, 2018 22:31:10 GMT
Absolutely not surprised. There are worse situations than this!
|
|
EvilSpiriT
Full Member
Posts: 120
Likes: 50
Country: India
Region: Hindu
|
Post by EvilSpiriT on Nov 2, 2018 4:44:28 GMT
For doctors, they have to abandon feeling and they have to be mentally prepared for it. Human body is indeed a subject of vivisection for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Nov 2, 2018 4:48:26 GMT
sad
What are these doctors? Robots? A dead baby is far from 'medical waste', any doctor that thinks otherwise needs to be taken out and labeled as medical waste themselves especially if they cannot recognize the difference between a person and actual medical waste >:(
|
|
EvilSpiriT
Full Member
Posts: 120
Likes: 50
Country: India
Region: Hindu
|
Post by EvilSpiriT on Nov 2, 2018 4:56:53 GMT
I know stating dead remnants as "medical waste" might sound rude, but that actually is. Without soul, human body is nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Nov 2, 2018 4:58:08 GMT
I know stating dead remnants as "medical waste" might sound rude, but that actually is. Without soul, human body is nothing. How do you know it didn't have a soul? |
|
EvilSpiriT
Full Member
Posts: 120
Likes: 50
Country: India
Region: Hindu
|
Post by EvilSpiriT on Nov 2, 2018 5:07:50 GMT
I know stating dead remnants as "medical waste" might sound rude, but that actually is. Without soul, human body is nothing. How do you know it didn't have a soul? I didn't say that it didn't have a soul, i just gave a generalized view of relationship between Body and soul (self). Both alone can never function, they both have to be together. In whether case, the fetus was declared dead already. It'd have been hard for his lady to accept her fate but that was it. |
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on Nov 2, 2018 5:14:02 GMT
sad What are these doctors? Robots? A dead baby is far from 'medical waste', any doctor that thinks otherwise needs to be taken out and labeled as medical waste themselves especially if they cannot recognize the difference between a person and actual medical waste >:( I had no idea that dead babies or dead humans were infectious since that's required to be labelled as medical waste. So what were the parents infected with when they held their dead son in their bare heads? "Medical waste is any kind of waste that contains infectious material (or material that’s potentially infectious)." "Some examples are...bandages, gloves, discarded sharps like needles or scalpels...." www.medprodisposal.com/what-is-medical-waste-medical-waste-definition-types-examples-and-moreSounds to me that this doctor didn't get a good education so isn't fully qualified if he doesn't know what is medical waste. Shrug |
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Nov 2, 2018 5:14:06 GMT
How do you know it didn't have a soul? I didn't say that it didn't have a soul, i just gave a generalized view of relationship between Body and soul (self). Both alone can never function, they both have to be together. In whether case, the fetus was declared dead already. It'd have been hard for his lady to accept her fate but that was it. So you think dead people are just medical waste? |
|
EvilSpiriT
Full Member
Posts: 120
Likes: 50
Country: India
Region: Hindu
|
Post by EvilSpiriT on Nov 2, 2018 5:15:16 GMT
I didn't say that it didn't have a soul, i just gave a generalized view of relationship between Body and soul (self). Both alone can never function, they both have to be together. In whether case, the fetus was declared dead already. It'd have been hard for his lady to accept her fate but that was it. So you think dead people are just medical waste? I do not think that, but how do you think that they could be productive either? |
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Nov 2, 2018 5:17:48 GMT
So you think dead people are just medical waste? I do not think that, but how do you think that they could be productive either? It was a baby... So, by your logic, no babies are humans only because they cannot be productive? |
|
EvilSpiriT
Full Member
Posts: 120
Likes: 50
Country: India
Region: Hindu
|
Post by EvilSpiriT on Nov 2, 2018 5:21:01 GMT
I do not think that, but how do you think that they could be productive either? It was a baby... So, by your logic, no babies are humans only because they cannot be productive? Man, you're twisting the whole concept without even considering what i said. I didn't impose that babies are not humans. Indeed they have a life. Guide me where did this thought appear in my words about babies? And how come dead can be used ( except donation of body parts to needy people) ? I hope someone won't showcase them. |
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on Nov 2, 2018 5:24:21 GMT
It was a baby... So, by your logic, no babies are humans only because they cannot be productive? Man, you're twisting the whole concept without even considering what i said. I didn't impose that babies are not humans. Indeed they have a life. Guide me where did this thought appear in my words about babies? And how come dead can be used ( except donation of body parts to needy people) ? I hope someone won't showcase them. I'm only asking questions. A dead person cannot be productive, nor can a dead person have a soul, that is obvious. The point I am making is they consider a dead baby "medical waste" like you do, as you said "I know stating dead remnants as "medical waste" might sound rude, but that actually is.". Medical waste was defined in this thread already. Dead people aren't medical waste, and you even agreed with that. So, what I am trying to understand is what you think a dead baby is. |
|
EvilSpiriT
Full Member
Posts: 120
Likes: 50
Country: India
Region: Hindu
|
Post by EvilSpiriT on Nov 2, 2018 5:31:50 GMT
It's an intrapartum death. It's just a misfortune who met with hardship in his nascent phase. Death itself is full stop to life. It is eternal oblivion (also referred to as non-existence or nothingness) is the permanent cessation of one's consciousness upon death. So basically, it's a body only, without any purpose, because his right has already been snatched off.
|
|
