Post by treez on Jul 1, 2018 7:25:24 GMT
So basically sight is, as most of you know, an algorithm dependent on certain factors.
Rough Formula:
We have a force of transmission, which, when it comes to light, is usually a type of radiant energy.
The sun is naturally, our main source of energy in the solar system, heated to high temperatures by the conversion of Nuclear Binding Energy due to the fusion of Hydrogen at its core.
We can quantify this force of transferal in, for example, the CI Unit joule.
Which is essentially the sum of :
Moving the direction of force (f) 1 Meter / 100cm (metric scale) against a force of 1 Newton.
We then have the process of sight.
We train our eyes on a certain point in space.
And the proportions of mass that we focus on absorb all of the surrounding radiant energy based on its color, reflecting a spectrum from the sum of which, we process the color we see through cells in the eyes.
This data is, in short, essentially sent from the eyes to the brain, which basically computes it through several layers of the brain in order to define it. The degree of definition depends on the human perspective of the individual, however we can accept from this formula we do derive some form of common human truth that we share, universally.
For example, we have two people, in a room with the dimensions of 2m L x 2m H x 2m B.
One is claustrophobic (Person A).
Both Person A and Person B are able to calculate they are in a 2 x 2 x 2 room. This is our Human Truth, respectively.
However Person B's awareness of reality would be closer to "Universal Human Truth"
Than that of the perspective of Person A's.
As person A's reality is processed through an additional, powerfully influencing layer when considering claustrophobia.
If we accept this theory as true, and look closer at the actual process of this definition its self.
We know it is based off of the experience of the 6 Human senses.
- Touch
- Sight
- Hearing
- Smell
- Taste
- Association, referenced as the "third eye", which is the human ability to conceptualize based on a perceived understanding of the combination of the previous 5 factors.
These factors are the core elements of our experience as Human Beings.
Association controls certain sub-factors such as emotion, spirituality, religion and language.
It has arguably the most influential impact on the perspective, that being the sum of all the previous factors relative to the present 'state' of experience. Previous experience is the equal and opposite force to the new experience.
For example, if we have Person A and Person B regarding a table.
Person A being English. Person B being German.
Our calculations of observation will both be equal to observing the same table.
However only the Person A would realize it as a "Table."
Person B, on the other hand, would realize it as a "Tisch", which is the German word for Table.
The shared Human truth is that the object is indeed a Table none the less.
However the Universal truth is that the table is simply mass.
It's our association based on previous experiences, which in this case is deferred by:
- The knowledge of the German Language from previous sensory experiences accumulating
- The Live Visual experience of having seen a table several times in order to know its geometry for what it is, relative to Human Truth / The Human Perspective.
That leads us to form this Human Perspective, essentially confining us to this interpretation of existence.
It's through this avenue of thought that I have formulated we can never know more than the Human Perspective, and that perspective cannot be seen as Universal Truth because we are confined to the role of the observer.
Also, the layering of the brains thought process biologically indicates in a clear manner that the purpose of the Brain is to learn and improve. The fundamental process of which can also be quantified in joules, be it kinetic energy that powers our muscles or so forth, it's adamantly indisputable that we are made of the same components that comprise the greater universe its self.
To finalize, look at the journey of color to the eyes a bit closer.
The synopsis of the process is essentially:
We see and process that which the higher body of the universe rejects.
If we formulate closer to this point, we see the same pattern in a lot of the earths organisms.
For example, the cone cells in a humans eyes responsible for processing light in most cases, are quantified in a fewer number than that of for example, a dogs, suggesting that a dog is subjectively meant to process and understand a lower spectrum / frequency of light based on its physical biology.
Conceptualizing, I believe this suggests that if we are to observe the natural order of things and see that biology often serves as a reference "base point" for capacity for Universal understanding, it seems only logical to formulate that we are vessels that the universe is using in order to know its self, and I think that that's a beautiful thing, however it would insinuate that we will never know the Higher truth of the Universe, an understanding we are beginning to realize with aspects of science like string theory - The acknowledgment of higher frequencies of the universe that the human perspective struggles to subsume.
Thoughts welcome.
