|
Post by Lone Wanderer on May 22, 2018 10:13:19 GMT
Source: The future is mixed-raceAnd so is the past. Migration and mingling are essential to human success in the past, the present and into the future If the history of life on Earth can teach us anything, it is this: as conditions change, species either adapt or become extinct. In our time of considerable environmental change, humanity should consider its options. No species, even the almighty Homo sapiens, can stop evolution completely. But we can choose to limit our capacity for ongoing biological adaptation in an effort to remain ever the same by keeping populations isolated. Of course, such decisions are not made by humanity as a whole but by individuals and governments. Nationalism and xenophobia, on the rise in the US and Europe, threaten to decrease genetic exchange between populations, stifling our ability to continue evolving and adapting. Alternatively, we can embrace immigration and globalisation in an effort to position ourselves for a brighter future. The underlying causes of the current high rates of human migration are likely to persist, and perhaps to increase, as the global human population continues to grow. Access to natural resources such as fresh water have long driven population movements, and these might become even more important drivers of migration as the world’s population expands. Likewise, as economic development proceeds, the amount of resources used by each person will continue to rise, putting further pressure on scarce resources and further motivating people to move in search of better conditions. Sea levels are expected to continue rising as a result of global climate change, and this is likely to drive large-scale population movements away from low-lying coastal areas as they become uninhabitable. In short, the reshuffling of populations that results from the movement of people around the world will continue to shape the structure of our gene pool – and, by extension, our future evolution – for many generations to come.
|
|
|
Post by fschmidt on May 22, 2018 19:51:28 GMT
The future is new races. New races form whenever there is a coherent group that has barriers to entry (preferably religious or cultural). The average human being is a pathetic degenerate moron who deserves extinction, which I expect they (their descendants) will get as times becoming harder. So those who don't belong to coherent groups will die out and new races will form from coherent groups.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2018 23:40:12 GMT
Why is it a skin colour that "determines" someone's "race"? Why not any other feature?
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on May 25, 2018 4:30:20 GMT
Why is it a skin colour that "determines" someone's "race"? Why not any other feature? Actually it's not 100% based on skin color, e.g. someone may has light skin but it does not put them in White or Caucasoid category automatically. Or having dark skin is not equal to Black/Negroid race. Facial features and other physical traits play their own rules in definition of race. If you add DNA and genetic admixture to it, the case becomes more complicated. Archaic human admixture with modern humans
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2018 4:42:27 GMT
<abbr>That's not a very common knowledge. And at the same time people without such knowledge have a tendency to determine someone's "race" on someone's skin colour. </abbr>
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on May 25, 2018 5:25:36 GMT
Why is it a skin colour that "determines" someone's "race"? Why not any other feature? Maybe it's because it's the most noticeable things? I mean we have a lot of skin after all Shrug
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on May 25, 2018 5:59:27 GMT
Changes in the person in the future!
|
|
|
Post by Lone Wanderer on May 25, 2018 6:05:39 GMT
Why is it a skin colour that "determines" someone's "race"? Why not any other feature? Maybe it's because it's the most noticeable things? I mean we have a lot of skin after all Most noticeable and meaningless at the same time in my opinion. Consider this Mongolian woman and her baby: And read my previous post.
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on May 25, 2018 6:08:46 GMT
Maybe it's because it's the most noticeable things? I mean we have a lot of skin after all Most noticeable and meaningless at the same time in my opinion. Consider this Mongolian woman and her baby: And read my previous post. Yup. And families don't need to be by blood even. They can be by marriage or adoption. And at times families by marriage or adoption prove to be better families. I read countless stories where a parent harmed or killed their biological child. Unbelievable.
|
|
|
Post by Διαμονδ on May 25, 2018 6:11:20 GMT
And read my previous post. Yup. And families don't need to be by blood even. They can be by marriage or adoption. And at times families by marriage or adoption prove to be better families. I read countless stories where a parent harmed or killed their biological child. Unbelievable. You can see that your Rock is big! This is happening to this day also!
|
|
|
Post by hellenic on May 25, 2018 7:39:13 GMT
Not as long as im concerned. My children will be taught that the most precious thing they have is their people and they should not throw that in the trash by race miximg in extinction
|
|
|
Post by Elizabeth on May 25, 2018 7:47:02 GMT
Not as long as im concerned. My children will be taught that the most precious thing they have is their people and they should not throw that in the trash by race miximg in extinction What would be your response if one of the kids says they're in love and don't think there's someone better for them? :/
|
|
fashtag
New Member
Posts: 43
Likes: 27
Ethnicity: German/English
Country: Texas, USA
Politics: Right
|
Post by fashtag on May 25, 2018 8:18:46 GMT
It might be advantageous for those lower in the hierarchy to encourage mixing. However, it would not be advantageous for the people they would need to mix with. There are also all sorts of religious and cultural issues. Cultures are not equally valuable, useful or productive. This vague "mixing is good" argument is pretty unconvincing IMHO. We are entering a phase where the environment for humans has changed rapidly and thus evolution has not kept up. In this new system, it is clear that IQ is even more advantageous than it previously was. Thus, convincing high IQ people that mixing with low IQ people is a good thing will be difficult. They rightfully oppose being overrun by lower IQ groups. The offspring from these pairings have IQs roughly equidistant between their parents. It is, however, true that lower IQ people are reproducing more, propped up by the system higher IQ people have created and the altruism that these people seem to exemplify. It may just be that this extreme altruism is so detrimental to higher IQ peoples that it outweighs the advantage of their higher IQ. I think we are seeing this change and it is a good thing that there is opposition to mixing up all of the peoples of the world. There can be no diversity without separation and there will be no undoing the mix up once it happens.
|
|
|
Post by hellenic on May 25, 2018 10:06:25 GMT
Not as long as im concerned. My children will be taught that the most precious thing they have is their people and they should not throw that in the trash by race miximg in extinction What would be your response if one of the kids says they're in love and don't think there's someone better for them? :/ Disown
|
|
|
Post by DKTrav88 on May 25, 2018 10:13:44 GMT
I dont care much for race mixing as in whether it happens or not, because it has happened all throughout history through many different platforms, and I wouldn’t be for forcing one way or the other, but globalization can take a hike.
|
|